Drug and alcohol prohibition is extremely effective, and a much easier solution, and I’ve never seen evidence that what you assert is true. Should we allow drunk driving because it’s a “symptom of a drinking problem” which is a “symptom of child abuse”? Your argument is so fucking stupid.
Drug and alcohol prohibition is extremely effective, and a much easier solution, and I’ve never seen evidence that what you assert is true. Should we allow drunk driving because it’s a “symptom of a drinking problem” which is a “symptom of child abuse”? Your argument is so fucking stupid.