Okay it's a clickbait title but now that I have your attention I have a good point:

Guns are weird. They're so powerful that most people are understandably terrified to use them, so they rarely get used. If you do use them you are virtually guaranteed to have your life turned upside down by a MSM harassment campaign and you face a real risk of going to prison for a long time or being bankrupted through lawfare (even if you did nothing wrong because the courts are corrupt).

The marxist enemy is keenly aware of this and that's why, as strange as this sounds, they aren't particularly scared of your guns. It's why they're so bold in the face of armed political opponents. In fact they want you to shoot a couple of them (or run them over) to give them super valuable propaganda ammo. They want to demonize your movement, justify further removal of your rights and try to sway undecided people towards the left by portraying you as monsters and murderers, while they are "heroic protesters".

Don't get me wrong, guns and the 2A are extremely important and you should own guns and be well trained with them. But they're a nuclear option.

I see a lot of fantasizing and delusional comments on here about how you would use your 2A and gun down violent threats "in the right situation". Even though that situation almost never happens. It becomes this sad joke where boomers continue to age and talk about how one day they will use their guns. Meanwhile the left continues to destroy society and poison culture in ways that cannot be strategically countered using guns. By the time the scenario comes where you actually get to use your guns, there might be nothing left worth defending.

The worst cope of all is conservatives who think they don't have to do anything more because they own guns, they can even be out of shape blobs who just sit at home with muh guns ready for the civil war (which may never happen, who knows). And if it does happen, allowing the marxists to control every bit of society beyond your front door will guarantee them huge amounts of reinforcements that you could have denied them by getting involved before that point and preventing your culture from being taken over.

We need an unarmed force response. A perfect example would be the Italians defending the Columbus statue in Philadelphia. They didn't bring guns. Just a bunch of big tough guys who aren't afraid of a brawl. Now they have a bunch of advantages:

1. They run much lower legal risks. If some leftist gets in their face and they push them back or start throwing punches, their legal risks and risks of losing their job etc. are trivial compared to firing live rounds.

2. Due to the lower risks, it's easier to convince people to show up - therefore they can muster larger numbers on the ground.

3. It's quicker and more convenient than organizing some sort of armed presence. You just show up. You don't need a bunch of equipment with you.

4. The media cannot portray them as some kind of armed militia terrorist group, and feds can't classify and harass them along those lines either. It denies the enemy propaganda ammo.

5. They have more than enough unarmed force to counter scrawny pathetic soy boys.

TLDR: Be a law abiding gun owner ready for the worst case scenario but be fit and use unarmed force where legally appropriate to defend statues and deny the marxist enemy physical control of the public square (while minimizing your own personal risks, legal and otherwise).