Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.
You could be right. And if so the title is very misleading YourDaddyKnowsBest
That said. The study does reflect some very important early findings:
"We have identified chloroquine as an effective antiviral agent for SARS-CoV in cell culture conditions, as evidenced by its inhibitory effect when the drug was added prior to infection or after the initiation and establishment of infection. The fact that chloroquine exerts an antiviral effect during pre- and post-infection conditions suggest that it is likely to have both prophylactic and therapeutic advantages."
His parent organization has known since 2005 that chloroquine was an effective treatment and prophylactic for viruses just like COVID. The evidence has been there (published by his parent organization) for years. It has a lot to do with Fauci.
Which parent organisation?
The paper was written by people from the CDC and Clinical Research Institute of Montreal.
NIAID is a part of the NIH.
Both NIH and CDC are parts of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the HHS is a huge umbrella organization.
One might as well say that the whole world knew about this paper since 2005 since it was in public domain.
Is Fauci a lying prick? Yes.
Should everyone making statements have done basic literature search? Yes.
Did Fauci know of this research? Likely.
Did he have anything to do with this paper? Unless he knew the authors personally - no.
Ok, you were referring to the accuracy of the tweet wording as opposed to the significance of the article. I agree the tweet saying “Fauci approved” is not accurate.
Yo brother. We're on the same team. I wanted a source of the report where it shows fauci approving this shit 15 years ago so I can share it with people and highlight what a fucking farce this whole thing is.
Different board? Why you eating your own.
I'm well aware of fauci being scum and the benefits of hcq. Just wanted the official report where I can say here look. This is fauci saying this shit works 15 years ago.
Says nothing about Fauci approving chloroquine. Says nothing about Fauci at all.
We gotta hold ourselves to a little higher standard. So this whole post is basically a rehash of what we found out months ago. HCQ helps prevent and treat.
I wanted the Fauci tie in because that would have been money. No dice.
Saying he knew (which I agree) is diff than saying he personally approved it as a treatment.
If I tell someone Fauci approved HCQ 15 years ago and they wanted proof I would then need to revise my statement to say well Fauci didn't approve it for treatment, but the NIH documented that it helped.
There's a difference. Liberals twist shit and manipulate shit all the time. I don't want to be like a frothing lefty. We have more than enough facts and data to support several issues we represent. We don't need to add hyperbole and Mistruths
Well I suppose you found you're limit actions on the topic. And in reality no, taking the high road against these below the belt losers os not the best way always.
Personally I think an all out everthing assault of truth and fabrication is fine also.
That said tell them to research it.
Ask questions, not statements. Give clues, links, memes, video, other content. ..
I was there the day one of the anons decided it was good idea to troll them all with a false meaning for the Okay Hand Sign into a White Power thing, post instantly they all believed that the OK hand sign was always a racist action. So really, you can tell them anything. Make you're own page that says faucci is all 100% responsible for everything from aids cancer, the preplanned release and testing in China (btw China has also flat lined, hmm? Was it supposed to be deadly, curable, and short lived? The political timing of this virus is impeccable! Covid 19 for Prez!!! )
So yeah send them there, they won't know any difference, they don't know shit anyways.
Media needs to be asking Fauci if he has any conflicts of interest that would prevent him from being impartial. Has he ever received money or gifts from a drug company, if so, how much? Does he have an investments in Drug Companies, if so, how much, and who controls his investment accounts? Has he ever been to lunch of dinner with a lobbyist or other agent who represents drug companies, if so, how often, and which companies? As Director of NIH, what did he know about the $3.2 million that was sent to the Wuhan lab? Why was this money sent, who approved it, how did that process work? Who has oversight of the NIH and NIAID? How often are they audited, what are they audited for? What are the findings? Has there ever been a need for significant corrective actions, what were they? What is the plan to review the pandemic response?
I'd say our media is lazy and incompetent, but instead I know they're corrupt and paid to run cover for these DS traitors.
Oh yeah, I know :) that's why I would have loved for Chanel Rion or someone to ask him about it during the daily china virus briefings. We need to shine the light on these swamp rats for the world to see.
to be fair, it doesnt cure EVERYONE. in the Ford center study which was very comprehensive, it cut mortality in half.
I would bet that the half that died anyway were primarily very old and had multiple comorbidities, which they dont mention (at least in the headlines).
Yeah.. most of us knew all of this already. All of the Doctors RXing this shit are utilizing Zinc as well.
All very positive studies include Zinc. The semi-positive ones do not. And the not-positive ones are when people were given HCQ to late during the infection.
I read just a few days after the pandemic started that zinc and a zinc ionophore, such as hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine quinine, EGCG, or quercetin, were known to be very effective against coronavirus. Apparently, zinc stops the virus from replicating and the zinc ionophore helps it enter cells to do its job. This remedy should have been used from the start, and especially given to dying patients who had nothing to lose.
My thought was that the treatment was started far too late. HCQ is most effective when used early on, heck it can even be used as a prophylactic and some hospitals gave it to their staffs for that purpose. What it can't do though, is save someone who is already at deaths door, and I understand that was often the only people who were even given the option.
You knew it, I knew it -- but folks shared additional sources in the comments, and "months ago" our audience (and ranking) was a fraction (I dare say) of what it is now.
I'd say it's a good reminder for some and for others it's a much needed red pill.
I cannot emphasise enough that this has been CLEAR for months, if you can read and trust your own eyes. But I suppose people just want to get it spoon fed to them from "authority" so they can ignore everything else and live a simple life. Now the authorities are wrong, and they don't even allow you a simple life anymore.
That's goona be the best part... When the news is forced to back up what the patriots have been telling them all along. They are pathetic, not being able to change thier stance on anything unless the media tells them so and it's ok.
Yes, this has been known. They used it to treat SARS. Take your request for sources and shove them up your ass. If a doctor wants to use it then a governor should be the last piece of shit to decide if they can.
His NIH paid for the fraudulent VA “study” that intentionally gave bad numbers to HCQ and generated the “HCQ can kill you” headlines. Investigate the VA doctors that fabricated that garbage study and who paid them at NIH.
Fauci should be charged with Multiple Counts of Negligent Homicide, at the very least! He should also face Federal charges of Crimes Against Humanity, Perpetuating Fraud, & Pharmaceutical Fraud.
I'm gunna need a source on that
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/ - This is from 2005
Conclusion
Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.
While it is much appreciated, this paper is not related to Fauci. It doesn't even come from NIAID.
You could be right. And if so the title is very misleading YourDaddyKnowsBest
That said. The study does reflect some very important early findings:
"We have identified chloroquine as an effective antiviral agent for SARS-CoV in cell culture conditions, as evidenced by its inhibitory effect when the drug was added prior to infection or after the initiation and establishment of infection. The fact that chloroquine exerts an antiviral effect during pre- and post-infection conditions suggest that it is likely to have both prophylactic and therapeutic advantages."
His parent organization has known since 2005 that chloroquine was an effective treatment and prophylactic for viruses just like COVID. The evidence has been there (published by his parent organization) for years. It has a lot to do with Fauci.
Which parent organisation?
The paper was written by people from the CDC and Clinical Research Institute of Montreal.
NIAID is a part of the NIH.
Both NIH and CDC are parts of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the HHS is a huge umbrella organization.
One might as well say that the whole world knew about this paper since 2005 since it was in public domain.
Is Fauci a lying prick? Yes.
Should everyone making statements have done basic literature search? Yes.
Did Fauci know of this research? Likely.
Did he have anything to do with this paper? Unless he knew the authors personally - no.
Ok, you were referring to the accuracy of the tweet wording as opposed to the significance of the article. I agree the tweet saying “Fauci approved” is not accurate.
Thank you!
Not unless you just want to see it yourself, but we already knew this info months ago... there's nothing breaking about it
Yea I want to see it so I could shove down it down people's throats. I mean the report that shows fauci did this. Not a tweet.
Just search for it, it's everywhere, has been common knowledge for months.
And it's infuriating, Fauci is a sniveling little swamp piece of garbage. I hope the Don fires his tiny little ass.
I also despise him. I wonder if he knew Epstein?
I just kinda assumed he did lol
Report that shows Fauci did what? The report in the link above is unrelated to Fauci or any studies done by the NIAID.
Approved chloroquine 15 years ago for treatment of coronavirus 15 years ago
So I can continue to expose him for what he really is.
I have not seen that. Is there a link showing Fauci "approved chloroquine 15 years ago for treatment of coronavirus"?
That's precisely what I've been asking for. Says it in the tweet, which is the only place I've seen it
Lol, you need a source.?!?! Try using a new message board.
Yo brother. We're on the same team. I wanted a source of the report where it shows fauci approving this shit 15 years ago so I can share it with people and highlight what a fucking farce this whole thing is.
Different board? Why you eating your own.
I'm well aware of fauci being scum and the benefits of hcq. Just wanted the official report where I can say here look. This is fauci saying this shit works 15 years ago.
Shhhhsh... https://searchvoat.co/?t=HCQ
Here I did the research for you because the board is down from attacks I suppose, either that or the BoardOwner didnt pay the bills again, what ever.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
Says nothing about Fauci approving chloroquine. Says nothing about Fauci at all. We gotta hold ourselves to a little higher standard. So this whole post is basically a rehash of what we found out months ago. HCQ helps prevent and treat.
I wanted the Fauci tie in because that would have been money. No dice.
That's common knowledge from fucks parent company. He knew.
Saying he knew (which I agree) is diff than saying he personally approved it as a treatment.
If I tell someone Fauci approved HCQ 15 years ago and they wanted proof I would then need to revise my statement to say well Fauci didn't approve it for treatment, but the NIH documented that it helped.
There's a difference. Liberals twist shit and manipulate shit all the time. I don't want to be like a frothing lefty. We have more than enough facts and data to support several issues we represent. We don't need to add hyperbole and Mistruths
Well I suppose you found you're limit actions on the topic. And in reality no, taking the high road against these below the belt losers os not the best way always. Personally I think an all out everthing assault of truth and fabrication is fine also.
That said tell them to research it. Ask questions, not statements. Give clues, links, memes, video, other content. ..
I was there the day one of the anons decided it was good idea to troll them all with a false meaning for the Okay Hand Sign into a White Power thing, post instantly they all believed that the OK hand sign was always a racist action. So really, you can tell them anything. Make you're own page that says faucci is all 100% responsible for everything from aids cancer, the preplanned release and testing in China (btw China has also flat lined, hmm? Was it supposed to be deadly, curable, and short lived? The political timing of this virus is impeccable! Covid 19 for Prez!!! )
So yeah send them there, they won't know any difference, they don't know shit anyways.
Why you eating your own.
Growing not eating. Toughen up.
Media needs to be asking Fauci if he has any conflicts of interest that would prevent him from being impartial. Has he ever received money or gifts from a drug company, if so, how much? Does he have an investments in Drug Companies, if so, how much, and who controls his investment accounts? Has he ever been to lunch of dinner with a lobbyist or other agent who represents drug companies, if so, how often, and which companies? As Director of NIH, what did he know about the $3.2 million that was sent to the Wuhan lab? Why was this money sent, who approved it, how did that process work? Who has oversight of the NIH and NIAID? How often are they audited, what are they audited for? What are the findings? Has there ever been a need for significant corrective actions, what were they? What is the plan to review the pandemic response?
I'd say our media is lazy and incompetent, but instead I know they're corrupt and paid to run cover for these DS traitors.
Makes me wana go catch aids now.
Oh yeah, I know :) that's why I would have loved for Chanel Rion or someone to ask him about it during the daily china virus briefings. We need to shine the light on these swamp rats for the world to see.
to be fair, it doesnt cure EVERYONE. in the Ford center study which was very comprehensive, it cut mortality in half.
I would bet that the half that died anyway were primarily very old and had multiple comorbidities, which they dont mention (at least in the headlines).
Yeah.. most of us knew all of this already. All of the Doctors RXing this shit are utilizing Zinc as well.
All very positive studies include Zinc. The semi-positive ones do not. And the not-positive ones are when people were given HCQ to late during the infection.
I read just a few days after the pandemic started that zinc and a zinc ionophore, such as hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine quinine, EGCG, or quercetin, were known to be very effective against coronavirus. Apparently, zinc stops the virus from replicating and the zinc ionophore helps it enter cells to do its job. This remedy should have been used from the start, and especially given to dying patients who had nothing to lose.
My thought was that the treatment was started far too late. HCQ is most effective when used early on, heck it can even be used as a prophylactic and some hospitals gave it to their staffs for that purpose. What it can't do though, is save someone who is already at deaths door, and I understand that was often the only people who were even given the option.
This isn't breaking it all.... we knew this months ago.
Yep. But now the world must now!!!
You knew it, I knew it -- but folks shared additional sources in the comments, and "months ago" our audience (and ranking) was a fraction (I dare say) of what it is now.
I'd say it's a good reminder for some and for others it's a much needed red pill.
I cannot emphasise enough that this has been CLEAR for months, if you can read and trust your own eyes. But I suppose people just want to get it spoon fed to them from "authority" so they can ignore everything else and live a simple life. Now the authorities are wrong, and they don't even allow you a simple life anymore.
That's goona be the best part... When the news is forced to back up what the patriots have been telling them all along. They are pathetic, not being able to change thier stance on anything unless the media tells them so and it's ok.
Btw, it's ok to be white.
Yes, this has been known. They used it to treat SARS. Take your request for sources and shove them up your ass. If a doctor wants to use it then a governor should be the last piece of shit to decide if they can.
His NIH paid for the fraudulent VA “study” that intentionally gave bad numbers to HCQ and generated the “HCQ can kill you” headlines. Investigate the VA doctors that fabricated that garbage study and who paid them at NIH.
It’s just a coincidence!! Not really
Fauci should be charged with Multiple Counts of Negligent Homicide, at the very least! He should also face Federal charges of Crimes Against Humanity, Perpetuating Fraud, & Pharmaceutical Fraud.
But he needed to peddle something new , something Expensive. So his buddies at the insurance companies can make more
This has already been spread here at the beginning of the outbreak... Not new info.
No shut down necessary. No masks required. No 6’ apart, no lockdown. More than 100,000 small businesses didn’t need to die.
Shiet!! They talked about that on voat like in January..