2479
Comments (50)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
KAG4EVRodysseus11 11 points ago +12 / -1

to be fair, it doesnt cure EVERYONE. in the Ford center study which was very comprehensive, it cut mortality in half.

I would bet that the half that died anyway were primarily very old and had multiple comorbidities, which they dont mention (at least in the headlines).

21
theRealdakkath 21 points ago +21 / -0

Yeah.. most of us knew all of this already. All of the Doctors RXing this shit are utilizing Zinc as well.

All very positive studies include Zinc. The semi-positive ones do not. And the not-positive ones are when people were given HCQ to late during the infection.

8
cara_c 8 points ago +8 / -0

I read just a few days after the pandemic started that zinc and a zinc ionophore, such as hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine quinine, EGCG, or quercetin, were known to be very effective against coronavirus. Apparently, zinc stops the virus from replicating and the zinc ionophore helps it enter cells to do its job. This remedy should have been used from the start, and especially given to dying patients who had nothing to lose.

4
RonPaul1776 4 points ago +5 / -1

My thought was that the treatment was started far too late. HCQ is most effective when used early on, heck it can even be used as a prophylactic and some hospitals gave it to their staffs for that purpose. What it can't do though, is save someone who is already at deaths door, and I understand that was often the only people who were even given the option.