His parent organization has known since 2005 that chloroquine was an effective treatment and prophylactic for viruses just like COVID. The evidence has been there (published by his parent organization) for years. It has a lot to do with Fauci.
Which parent organisation?
The paper was written by people from the CDC and Clinical Research Institute of Montreal.
NIAID is a part of the NIH.
Both NIH and CDC are parts of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the HHS is a huge umbrella organization.
One might as well say that the whole world knew about this paper since 2005 since it was in public domain.
Is Fauci a lying prick? Yes.
Should everyone making statements have done basic literature search? Yes.
Did Fauci know of this research? Likely.
Did he have anything to do with this paper? Unless he knew the authors personally - no.
Ok, you were referring to the accuracy of the tweet wording as opposed to the significance of the article. I agree the tweet saying “Fauci approved” is not accurate.
His parent organization has known since 2005 that chloroquine was an effective treatment and prophylactic for viruses just like COVID. The evidence has been there (published by his parent organization) for years. It has a lot to do with Fauci.
Which parent organisation?
The paper was written by people from the CDC and Clinical Research Institute of Montreal.
NIAID is a part of the NIH.
Both NIH and CDC are parts of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the HHS is a huge umbrella organization.
One might as well say that the whole world knew about this paper since 2005 since it was in public domain.
Is Fauci a lying prick? Yes.
Should everyone making statements have done basic literature search? Yes.
Did Fauci know of this research? Likely.
Did he have anything to do with this paper? Unless he knew the authors personally - no.
Ok, you were referring to the accuracy of the tweet wording as opposed to the significance of the article. I agree the tweet saying “Fauci approved” is not accurate.