Says nothing about Fauci approving chloroquine. Says nothing about Fauci at all.
We gotta hold ourselves to a little higher standard. So this whole post is basically a rehash of what we found out months ago. HCQ helps prevent and treat.
I wanted the Fauci tie in because that would have been money. No dice.
Saying he knew (which I agree) is diff than saying he personally approved it as a treatment.
If I tell someone Fauci approved HCQ 15 years ago and they wanted proof I would then need to revise my statement to say well Fauci didn't approve it for treatment, but the NIH documented that it helped.
There's a difference. Liberals twist shit and manipulate shit all the time. I don't want to be like a frothing lefty. We have more than enough facts and data to support several issues we represent. We don't need to add hyperbole and Mistruths
Well I suppose you found you're limit actions on the topic. And in reality no, taking the high road against these below the belt losers os not the best way always.
Personally I think an all out everthing assault of truth and fabrication is fine also.
That said tell them to research it.
Ask questions, not statements. Give clues, links, memes, video, other content. ..
I was there the day one of the anons decided it was good idea to troll them all with a false meaning for the Okay Hand Sign into a White Power thing, post instantly they all believed that the OK hand sign was always a racist action. So really, you can tell them anything. Make you're own page that says faucci is all 100% responsible for everything from aids cancer, the preplanned release and testing in China (btw China has also flat lined, hmm? Was it supposed to be deadly, curable, and short lived? The political timing of this virus is impeccable! Covid 19 for Prez!!! )
So yeah send them there, they won't know any difference, they don't know shit anyways.
Here I did the research for you because the board is down from attacks I suppose, either that or the BoardOwner didnt pay the bills again, what ever.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
Says nothing about Fauci approving chloroquine. Says nothing about Fauci at all. We gotta hold ourselves to a little higher standard. So this whole post is basically a rehash of what we found out months ago. HCQ helps prevent and treat.
I wanted the Fauci tie in because that would have been money. No dice.
That's common knowledge from fucks parent company. He knew.
Saying he knew (which I agree) is diff than saying he personally approved it as a treatment.
If I tell someone Fauci approved HCQ 15 years ago and they wanted proof I would then need to revise my statement to say well Fauci didn't approve it for treatment, but the NIH documented that it helped.
There's a difference. Liberals twist shit and manipulate shit all the time. I don't want to be like a frothing lefty. We have more than enough facts and data to support several issues we represent. We don't need to add hyperbole and Mistruths
Well I suppose you found you're limit actions on the topic. And in reality no, taking the high road against these below the belt losers os not the best way always. Personally I think an all out everthing assault of truth and fabrication is fine also.
That said tell them to research it. Ask questions, not statements. Give clues, links, memes, video, other content. ..
I was there the day one of the anons decided it was good idea to troll them all with a false meaning for the Okay Hand Sign into a White Power thing, post instantly they all believed that the OK hand sign was always a racist action. So really, you can tell them anything. Make you're own page that says faucci is all 100% responsible for everything from aids cancer, the preplanned release and testing in China (btw China has also flat lined, hmm? Was it supposed to be deadly, curable, and short lived? The political timing of this virus is impeccable! Covid 19 for Prez!!! )
So yeah send them there, they won't know any difference, they don't know shit anyways.