3782
posted ago by BlondeBombshell88 ago by BlondeBombshell88 +3782 / -0

Don’t have fertility issues but was browsing my coverage for some other stuff and went down a rabbit hole. I have really really good health insurance that is probably better than 99% of Americans so I’m sure it’s true for everyone else. This is honestly super sad considering I have several coworkers that battled with infertility and spend THOUSANDS of dollars out of pocket to finally have their children. But they’ll pay for you to mutilate your body and even fly you to have the procedure done. Unbelievable.

Comments (264)
sorted by:
181
OneTypoComment 181 points ago +183 / -2

they've accelerated their plan for us. There's no denying it if you have two eyes to see.

84
wong 84 points ago +87 / -3

Little known fact, if you are a woman trying to get pregnant there is a simple loophole to take advantage of.

First, approach any medical "professional" except "your doctor" (that was just a marketing gimmick silly).

Second, tell this "professional" that you now identify as a "man".

Third, fill out a half page questionnaire verifying you have given this important decision at least 2 minutes of careful consideration.

Fourth, enjoy having your insides ripped out and turned into a lumpy meat sausage. Don't worry, taxpayer funding ensures you can have any stuffing you desire.

Fifth, enjoy your new found male privilege and insist that your healthcare "professional" now inseminate you with a baby with a skin tone that best fits your virtues. Do not worry if you are uncertain about your preference for the baby's gender. You can always change this later, as often as you please provided you meet criteria such as "definitely have a feeling about it", "my child once did a thing that was not gender specific", "one of his/her/xirs playschool teachers said something"

Six, simply change your mind about your current gender assignment and request a switchback.

Remember, in case your freshly inverted meat sausage is unable to fully function as a vagina, just call our suicide hotline to speak with one of three nationwide friendly voice messaging systems between the hours of 11am and 1pm on Wednesdays and Fridays, excluding lunch hours between 11.30am and 12.30pm. Our operators speak Spanish, Chinese or any one of the somali dialects.

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
30
TheEmperorProtects 30 points ago +30 / -0

It’s one of those things where you laugh because it’s uncomfortably accurate

13
Ask_If_Im_A_Cactus 13 points ago +13 / -0

It can be both

19
OneTypoComment 19 points ago +20 / -1

reminds me of crazy card combinations playing Magic the Gathering from decades past.

We should make a new card game called Libtard the Karening.

5
The_T-1000_Hillary 5 points ago +5 / -0

I dunno, new colour of magic? Their armies would rely on surrounding single enemies and hitting them with bikelock stuns, and they could eat their own to regain life points.

2
Kapral_Wojtek 2 points ago +2 / -0

The sounds kinda like black, what with the zombies hordes, sacrifice mechanics and everything.

9
Mynamesprivate 9 points ago +9 / -0

Don't forget to be simultaneously offended because they assumed gender, and apologetic because of your white privilege during your call. Just blame it on the patriarchy and/ or your pregnancy hormones.

8
The_T-1000_Hillary 8 points ago +8 / -0

"at least 2 minutes of careful consideration" top. fucken. kek

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
8
45GoldenEra 8 points ago +8 / -0

in Germany you see every muslim woman pregnagt, germany does nothing for a woman who was bought in some shithole as slave and brought to procreate in europe, for real, there is been cases already, dismised

2
HungNavySeal300Kills 2 points ago +2 / -0

Share some on the main page. Always eager for diverse news.

1
45GoldenEra 1 point ago +1 / -0

i will thanks, Germany sure has a lot of "material" when it comes about that

4
DiscerningSword 4 points ago +4 / -0

Half the Frogs are out of the Pot already so they have turned the heat up to 11 before anymore get out...It's to late for them asthey do not have the Critical mass History has not ended and these flailing about is proof that they are desperate....

2
ThurtineFiddyToo 2 points ago +2 / -0

And this is why globalisation is not just a natural consequence of the pursuit of greater economic data. There's no way one can run the numbers and determine an imported worker is more economically beneficial than a native born worker. Native is perfectly assimilated at minimal cost. Immigrant is minimally assimilated at maximum cost.

This is an ancient blood feud that goes back a thousand years, if not more. Whites have been hypnotised and seduced by modern conveniences in order to not see the war until it's too late. Boiled frogs.

124
iceyd 124 points ago +126 / -2

The trans movement is a human tragedy.

80
deleted 80 points ago +80 / -0
50
FuckReddit4545 50 points ago +50 / -0

Its abuse that will lead to mutilation and then suicide. This must be stopped.

16
Independenceforever 16 points ago +16 / -0

Bad parents teach children self-mutilation - in some way or another, drugs, sex, self-harm, codependency, etc.

Self-hating cowards too afraid to die or hurt themselves. Take it out on their own kids.

Drives me crazy. Kids just want to love them and make their parents proud - unaware of how unreachable and twisted they are.

Better to have a tough life and a soul than some vapid child soul killer like a "transchild" parent.

Tragedy alright.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
8
Daemoness 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yabbut, his mawm (it's usually the female biological parent) undoubtedly looked thrilled to show publicly how Woke and Accepting she was, didn't she-?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sure it was a boy?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
37
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 37 points ago +37 / -0

Imagine passing someone on the street who is setting themselves on fire, and the acceptable reaction is to say “they must identify as a candle.”

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
4
JohnBrownsBody 4 points ago +5 / -1

I'm thinking more of a meat grinder

15
MichelleObamasBulge 15 points ago +15 / -0

It’s not a “trans” movement. It’s a white genocide happening in slow motion

13
sagebrushfire 13 points ago +13 / -0

Society sanctioned child abuse with the utter minority dictating policy to the majority.

78
Ninjavideo 78 points ago +79 / -1

They want to replace us with a populace of docile followers.

Simple as that.

Why should the upper upper class of America deal with Americans who’ve been here for the last 300 years and established roots here? Those Americans come with rights and the concept of individuality, they’ll stick up for themselves if they feel threatened...

Why not just go down the road of death by 1000 cuts to get rid of these people? Starve them of opportunity and jobs and in the meantime import people who will do the necessary domestic work, maybe not as well but at least they’ll be docile and tame. The upper upper class literally gets to to have their cake and eat it too.

In addition they get to lecture us about the environment, child labour laws & human rights while enjoying the fruits of international labour that do not have to abide by these same fucking rules.

No more lawyers and career politicians making decisions but the way to guarantee November is by communicating and helping our fellow neighbours see the light of the right, not with violence & intimidation.

22
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

That is an extremely good point

12
deleted 12 points ago +14 / -2
10
dasvolk 10 points ago +10 / -0

consumeproduct.win is for you!

3
WeinerLapTop 3 points ago +3 / -0

Future HOF consoomer.

7
meals23 7 points ago +7 / -0

everything gets more nefarious when you factor in lunatics like bill and melinda gates

this from a tweet storm back in april from robert kennedy jr

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVF1mJMXsAM_7qi?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVF1mIJXYAAXrqQ?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVF1mIQX0AEU0LD?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVF1nZmWsAAwAKR?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVF1naZX0AAU2pH?format=jpg&name=large

now keep in mind that bill gates did not vaccinate his own children

the goal seems pretty obvious here, mandate vaccinations that cause infertility to lower the world population

this fucker just made an operating system for computers. who elected him king of the earth to make these kinds of decisions?

1
LizardPerson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this legit?

Robert Kennedy Jr. seems to post a lot of anti-Trump garbage, too.

He has suggested that Ajit Pai and Trump are a part of the larger conspiracy, and that they are not fighting for us.

1
chelthing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Satan, of course!

1
Ninjavideo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep I agree with that - if it’s good for thee make it good for me when looking at gates

60
travistd6789 60 points ago +62 / -2

You can thank Obama for the sex change coverage. You're paying for the chance you might use it, whether you choose to or not.

44
deleted 44 points ago +44 / -0
34
deleted 34 points ago +34 / -0
33
tepkek 33 points ago +33 / -0

That's the kind of thing that should be executive ordered out asap.

4
meals23 4 points ago +4 / -0

thank god trump banned trannies from serving in the military because the vast majority of trannies that were in the military were joining so they could have the government pay for their mutiliation

1
viVbiz-bufmu1-qodmem 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did that take effect? I remember it being a thing and sec def was upset that his opinion wasn’t asked.

1
meals23 1 point ago +1 / -0

well we know now (and to my everlasting disappointment, believe me) that Mattis was a cuck the whole time, so it makes sense

2
Nikola_S1 2 points ago +2 / -0

And isn't being transgender a pre-existing condition?

1
Independenceforever 1 point ago +1 / -0

Michael too.

51
deleted 51 points ago +52 / -1
40
deleted 40 points ago +41 / -1
11
NoMoreLies 11 points ago +11 / -0

I wonder, would some people be able to escape into the wilderness and go full Amish?

6
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Damn that sounds like a good movie idea

16
TexasPiper 16 points ago +16 / -0

Right...movie...

6
FuckReddit4545 6 points ago +6 / -0

But what of the chocolate rations brother?

3
Independenceforever 3 points ago +3 / -0

Criminal underground and mafias will be ungovernable.

This is always a nice NWO failsafe.

When competition goes friendly in comes Renaissance.

Dystopia is fun but I think it's fantasy.

Believe in the spirit God puts in us too much 🇺🇸 and cannot comprehend such mass compliance.

Slaves will eventually revolt and choose a new master.

2
WeinerLapTop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cyberpunk is gonna be LIT

38
deleted 38 points ago +39 / -1
4
mikegrouchy 4 points ago +6 / -2

Demons

Demons' Amulets: Demon lords and princes maintain their vital essences in small containers - their souls, so to speak, are thus at once protected and yet vulnerable if some enterprising character should gain the amulet. Demons with amulets are able to magic jar once per day. Demons' amulets cannot be detected as such by any magical means, and they do not otherwise appear unusual in any way. The device need not be with the most powerful princes, although the lesser demons typically need to carry theirs on or near their persons. Possession of an amulet gives the possessor power over the demon to whom it "belongs" for the space of, for example, one adventure, and never more than a day (24 hours). The amulet must then be returned to the demon - or it can be destroyed and thus condemn the prince to abyssment for a year (and he may return thereafter only if summoned). Use of an amulet is very, very dangerous. Possession of one will double chances of calling the attention of another demon, and any demon not controlled by the device will immediately attack the person possessing such an amulet. If the amulet leaves the hand of the one commanding the demon to whom it belongs, that demon attacks him in its most effective fashion immediately, attempting his utmost to slay and then to carry 011 that remains to his own domain, i.e. that character is lost and gone forever. On the positive side, however, if the wielder of the amulet carefully repays the demon for aid rendered, adds a considerable sum for having the temerity to dare to command the demon in the first place, and then carefully restores the amulet to the demon, the prince might not bear him a grudge forever ofterwards nor seek to hunt him out whenever possible.


Devils

It is possible to destroy the material form of a greater devil or duke of Hell, but such creatures can not actually be slain unless encountered and fought in Hell or those lower planes adjacent to it. Devils can never be subdued. The lesser ones will always fight until destroyed; the greater ones will negotiate if seriously threatened. Devils will serve if properly commanded, but it is risky business, far an improper command will break the law which binds them to service. (It also typically requires a contract for the soul of the creature commanding the internal power to obey.) It is possible for other than lawful evil persons to invoke or otherwise treat with devils (but the long spoon, aft spoken of, had better be used when supping with such monsters). Magic circles will keep devils off for a time if they are properly scribed (and ensymboled in the case of a greater and arch-devils). Devils are repelled by holy (good) artifacts or relics

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
mikegrouchy 1 point ago +1 / -0

1st edition D&D, Monster Manual

1
Independenceforever 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you waiting still?

Lol since 1998

33
Bigus_Dickus 33 points ago +33 / -0

Satan wants to destroy humanity and keep us from following God Almighty's instructions about spreading out and populating the earth. Satan especially hates it when certain demo groups that are MUCH more likely to create stable, healthy, happy families with both a Mother AND Father(these things amazingly seem to go hand in hand) procreate.

As at the end of the day we are not at war against flesh and blood and the Bill Gates and Rothschild's of this world are merely Satan's little lackeys.

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isaiah 14:12-22

12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.

16 They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;

17 That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?

18 All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house.

19 But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet.

20 Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned.

21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.

22 For I will rise up against them, saith the Lord of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the Lord.

Ultimately, Satan's sin was that he wanted to replace God. Satan is trying to recreate heaven on earth right now, believe it or not, but without the free will component.

27
Toughsky_Shitsky 27 points ago +30 / -3

Invitro fertilization is FUCKING expensive .. $10,000+ per try, and it may take a dozen tries before a child takes .. had a friend go through it - paid out of his pocket because wifey demanded it. Beat the shit out of his savings, and she never got pregnant.

Good reason why isurance won't cover it.

BUT: tranny ops, travel, abortions, sterilization? Fuck if those costs should be spread around to healthy people, raising their rates.

22
tepkek 22 points ago +24 / -2

A human will put far more value back into a nation than even the most expensive IVF procedures. I'm all for reduced government spending, but funds spent on increasing birthrates is just about the best investment a government can make, even if it takes 20+ years to bear fruit.

Of course, falling birthrates are the (main) excuse given for flooding western nations with immigrants so (as with a lot of things) spotting the longer term pattern of destabilization behind such decisions is pretty straightforward.

10
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 10 points ago +11 / -1

I get that but there are a lot of other expensive treatments that insurance does cover.

2
leonfire99 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it's rare then they can cover it for "cheap" in a sense. The less likely it is then the lower the cost.

If you have 1000 insured and a $20 procedure everyone gets the expected cost is $20. If you have a $2000 procedure that only .1% of the population gets then the expected cost is $2. So even though it's an expensive procedure expected costs are low so they can afford it. Only a small portion of the population is trans so it makes for a cheap virtue signal. It's still a terrible agenda to push though.

5
BestTimeToBAlive 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yup. And now there’s is a lg portion of women having fertility issues nowadays.

The “Fertility Industrial Complex” is a Billion $ industry in the USA Today.

Doctors offices are packed to the brim, women & men are treated w little respect & given much fear from the onset... telling couples from the beginning that their chances are less than 2% of it working...so y’all keep coming back now, ya hear!

The next thing they’re pushing is egg donation ...where it’s an egg from another person. This surgery is prob much more costly than even IVF.

A vicious cycle of hormones, defeatist talk from doctors, and intense stress, creates more infertility for these couples.

It’s so sad!

2
Truthdose 2 points ago +2 / -0

The average age of a women who gets married is 27...up from 20 since 1960(i think).

The problem is older women or have children too late

3
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why just blame women? Everyone is getting married later. People act like it’s our (women’s) choice to wait so long. I would have gotten married at 24 if I had known ANY guys in my city willing to settle down that young. And I didn’t want to marry a guy 10 years older than me because I don’t want to be a young widow.

1
Ballind 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then crowd source it. We aren't Communists here

2
Ballind 2 points ago +5 / -3

To be fair, we shouldn't be paying for invitro either. I could see the argument if the girl was 18-22 and it was a legitimate medical issue but we're already encouraging women to wait too long.

People are trying to turn health insurance into health welfare

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
1
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, don’t blame all women. It’s hard especially in big cities like LA to find guys that age who want a relationship, let alone marriage. Blame Tinder and their endless supply of easy thots.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
mnguy12000 0 points ago +2 / -2

BINGO! Women put careers first then at 40 they say oh, I want kids, but they dont understand that their child baring years passed them by. At that age its so much harder to get pregnant and the chance of birth defects skyrockets. So what do they do, spend 100K of dollars on a 2-5% change of it working.

If these women were truly career goals based, then they should have had some of their eggs stored, then possibly used a surrogate to carry the child.

2
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is exactly what I’m doing, I’m 31, in a good relationship, but I went to freeze my eggs “just in case”. I can’t force my relationship to progress faster, you have to remember that the men in these situations have free will. Don’t put this all on us. A lot of men don’t want relationships or marriage these days, and ALL of my girlfriends do. They’re all having a hard time finding men who want to settle down. Then you turn around and blame us for “waiting” for something that was out of our control

1
mnguy12000 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am mainly talking about those Marriages where they wait until they are "secure" financially or decided to just wait.

But I get what you are saying. Problem also is the MWGTOW "movement" too. These POS guys want to have it all but not commit. Well take away what they want and guess what, they gone and weren't worth it anyway. while people dont like to heat it, church is a good place to meet a lasting partner, as they understand what marriage is about and who sex is meant for.

2
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Part of my problem with dating was not wanting to have early sex with men. So because if this I never had a serious relationship and finally just lost my virginity at age 28 to “get it over with”. in some ways it was prohibiting me from finding a long term partner. No one wanted to stick around long enough for me to develop real feelings before we had sex. Because these guys could easily go get laid by ordering a girl up like a pizza on tinder. So it pisses me off seeing so many men shaming women here for “waiting” til they got “old” as if it was a choice - men chose not to date me because I wouldn’t have sex with them without at least falling in love first. I had given up on the waiting until marriage thing a long time ago because I felt I’d never find a guy willing to wait and I was right. So then there I was still single and a Virgin at 28 all for nothing. And I get shamed for doing what I thought was the right thing. I didn’t “wait” to settle down because I wanted to hoe around first. Now I’m 31 and in a loving relationship and men here say that women in there 30s are expired goods. Well I’m sorry but I’m still very young and fertile. I’m also not going to rush my bf into marrying me too soon because that’s what causes divorce.

2
mnguy12000 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are not damaged goods. Once you hit 40 that's is when things really start having issues. I have many friends and family that experienced this. Hell we experienced it with 3 miscarriages as well have our First when my wife was 30, and our second when she was 34.

I feel for you, Hollywood, internet and MSM has created this hookup culture and it pains me to see people your age struggle.

I married my wife after a year and 9 months of knowing her. Hell I proposed to her 9 months of knowing her. I knew she was the one and still is 18 years later. We've had our ups and downs and adding kids into the mix strained our marriage, but we believe in Gods promise for Marriage and took those vows for "better or worse" "Richer or Poorer" and "sickness and Health".

Divorce isn't caused by marring to early. It usually caused by one partner forgetting the Vows they made under God. The Bible has marriage mapped out, just follow it and let it guide you. You'd be surprised at how much wisdom is actually in there when it comes to how to treat each other. 1 Corinthians 13 4-7 should be printed out and posted everywhere. Such good advice.

1
RenaissanceOfHope 1 point ago +2 / -1
  1. Did your friend even want to have children in the first place?

  2. Why was she so insistent on IVF and burning up of his savings?

19
George 19 points ago +19 / -0

They are actively trying to poison the minds of our youth through brainwashing them with the media, as well as using weak minded (also brainwashed) parents. Just look at how the media pushes this shit. Notice every once and a while the media will heavily push some celebrity's"trans" kid. This child has been abused since he was born. Made to think he was a girl. It is so disturbing that people think this actually happens naturally.

How exactly do they poison our youth? As I said parents are starting to think this shit is okay. Crazies will start putting their sons in dresses for no reason other than they want a daughter. But more "normal" parents might raise their kid "gender neutral". Or maybe when they see their son playing with a doll they think that he is actually a girl.

There was also that push of pedo story hour. Where these young kids are being exposed to men dressed in overly sexual drag. What exactly do you think that does to the child's mind. Make them think it is normal? It is just absolutely shocking how many parents took their kids to these "story hours". There very fact that people think this shit is okay is proof that their plan is working.

They are also increasing the amount of homosexuality we see on TV. I bet every mainstream show now has at least one gay character. Our youth sees this stuff and think it is all normal and okay. This shit literally will turn young people gay. A long with other things. Another disturbing problem is sexualization in certain pieces of media. Like music videos. The glorification of sex is a common thing in music videos. Always show practically naked women dancing in a sexual manner. Young children watch this stuff people. What do you think that does to a young boy or girls mind. They see this stuff and it becomes apparent that this is normal. Just look at what girls are wearing these days.

Why do 'they' want to do this. Because these globalists are into this shit themselves. Just look at Bill Gate's wife. Chuck Schumer's wife. Obama's wife. Do you really expect me to believe that those 3 people are women? The more gay and trans youth the less people are born. This is a form of population control.

This is why I have a hard time trusting any Politician. None of them talk about the REAL problems. Like protecting the future. Protecting the "king". Our children. None of them talk about how our minds are being destroyed or about the pedo problem in Hollywood or above. They just blabber on about racism, or gun control (another agenda of the globalists is unarming us and they will be able to that with this next submissive generation), or climate change (another hoax in an attempt to gain power) and other useless things.

11
Frog_Anne 11 points ago +11 / -0

They are definitely grooming children! They push sexual identity as early as possible, claiming they explain it in "age-appropriate" ways. There is no age-appropriate way when the child doesn't even understand sexual desire! By telling them it's about who they love, when the child doesn't know there's a difference between desire and innocently loving their friend, they push twisted ideas on the child and groom them. Then they show them gay characters in every show or book, and push transgender ideas as if it were a fun dress-up game. They're just setting up children to be easy targets for any pervert they meet.

5
mnguy12000 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep, a close friend of mine's daughter thought she was gay because she had a close girl friend. She was 13, thank God the mom explained that that is completely normal to feel close to another girl, but doesnt make you Gay. But the schools and media push this as FACT.

2
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly! I remember being that age and being paranoid that I was a lesbian or people thought I was a lesbian! I remember my girl neighbor and I kissed because we were trying to practice like the soap opera and her brother saw and called us dykes. I am definitely NOT a lesbian but at that young age I thought maybe I was because someone else told me I was.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
11
MemeLawd 11 points ago +11 / -0

Large Strong Families are the Greatest enemy to Marxism.

8
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 8 points ago +11 / -3

Also: for those claiming the invitro expense - how dare you deny a person their desperate, soul-crushing want of a child? Isn’t that the same if not worse than a tranny’s need to change sex? Denying someone parenthood because of the expense sounds very anti-liberal to me. Hmmm

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
2
Independenceforever 2 points ago +2 / -0

Knowledge of the industry or knowledge of how to scam it and customers and gov't (taxpayers) for billions 💸?

Yeah it's very mathematical, consistent, and yet somehow only comprehensible by the expert high priests who write the laws.

Thank you for your flex, captain obvious.

Point out what you know instead of obliquely referring without quote or link.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
7
you-know-im-right 7 points ago +7 / -0

Gods commandment is to be fruitful and multiply.

The modern world wants you to have transient sterile relationships and to mask your unfullfillment with alcohol and entertainment.

7
ModsBanPaleos 7 points ago +7 / -0

I like ur username. I love blonde bombshells.

6
BrazilianManPDX 6 points ago +6 / -0

legalized discrimination

5
freebirdie 5 points ago +6 / -1

Paying for sex changes and abortions is madness, but why is sterilization mixed with them? Lots of married men and women have vasectomies or tubal ligations if they don't want more children. Is this a thing some people actually oppose here?

Edit to add: if they're going to pay for sex changes, they should pay, at least for a period of time, for fertility treatments.

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +6 / -2

Sterilizing white people is part of the white genocide.

Why would someone need that, when contraception is available and effective?

It's a political statement. They hope to get some young white couple with their anti-child propagation.

1
freebirdie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many women cannot take hormonal birth control. There are many side effects, and I see nothing wrong with a woman preserving her health by having tubal ligation after she's born her children.The overwhelming majority of vasectomies and tubal ligations are performed on those who've already had their families. Frankly, sterilizing some libtard bitch, regardless of race, sounds pretty good to me considering that it would almost certainly prevent several abortions.

0
Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +1 / -1

There are other methods of birth control, with no side effects. The coil, for instance.

1
freebirdie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Having had an IUD that almost killed me, you are totally wrong.

3
Ashigaru 3 points ago +4 / -1

Conservatives aren't against those treatments existing, in general they are against it being forced to be provided via group insurance - like fertility treatments they should be paid through your own hard work or covered by an extra voluntary plan. The main reason insurance has become so expensive is because every year the treatment coverage list grows significantly.

People should be free to support whatever level of coverage they agree with in their insurance and should be able to pick and choose

2
freebirdie 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with this and agree with being able to pick and choose your level of coverage. I just didn't understand why vasectomies were being lumped in with sex changes and abortions.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
freebirdie 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why should your co workers pay for your barren womb treatments when there's so many children needing to be adopted?

Edit to add: I guess you didn't bother to read my original edit where I said they should pay for your treatment, but since you responded to me with such unneeded hostility, this is the response you get.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
leonfire99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its probably because those procedures they cover are rare (except abortion) but fertility and invetro are much more common. The rarer the procedure the lower the expected cost even if its expensive. So they can make the policy look better by having it offer more things while the policy only goes up a few cents or dollars for all the stuff added in because it's so unlikely for people to use it. Still a terrible thing to promote those things.

2
mnguy12000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes you should be able to add a rider to any plan to cover what YOU WANT....LIke, I dont know, the pre-Obummer plans? Granted they had different levels, but YOU HAD A CHOICE. Now its a one size fit all.

Imagine if auto or home insurance was like that? Consumer costs would go through the roof (no pun intended)

4
RealRedneck 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep. My wife and I have been struggling with infertility since we got married. So far she's had laparoscopy for endometriosis, 3 round of clomid and shots, experimental platelet rich plasma treatments, a d we're currently looking at stem cell injections. So far we've spent probably $50,000 out of pocket, and the stem cell cycle combined with invitro will probably cost another $50,000. Also, the general lack of research surrounding female fertility is appalling.

4
Paradyme 4 points ago +4 / -0

My wife and I too are struggling and will have to pay out of pocket more than likely. Almost no insurances cover infertility treatments unless you work at Starbucks, Lowe’s, Verizon and a few other major companies.

4
SinisterEaglePatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Unsolicited Fertility tips. Both male and female go to gym together. Lift weights. Do cardio. Eat healthy. Baby will happen.

2
RiverFenix 2 points ago +4 / -2

Also, don't wait until you're 40 to start having kids. While it can be a real struggle, having children in your early 20s will smarten you up (responsibility) and you won't be old and dying before the kids are finally grown and moved out.

Two 20 year olds are very fertile and their children will be as healthy as ever.

1
Leiloni 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not everyone is lucky enough to meet someone in their 20's.

0
RiverFenix 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've been meeting girls since the 2nd grade.

I'm not excessively handsome or exceedingly outgoing, I'm pretty 'normal'.. I think if you can make it to 20 without getting laid you've been trying Not to get laid. If you haven't made any connections with any women, you're trying not to. Maybe finding/making excuses..

I don't advocate for many things, but having sex with women is one.

1
Leiloni 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm a woman but I was also very shy until my mid 20's. I had a hard time even making friends let alone feeling comfortable talking to a man. Not everyone does things at the same ages in life.

1
RiverFenix 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wasn't shy, but I was a bit of a dork (still am, no doubt)..

4
TRUMPTRAINTODC 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s obvious and done in plain sight

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
0
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Adoption also costs $50k+, people act like you can just pick up a kid for free.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again this is not for me. I’m not trying to get pregnant or adopt right now. Just something I observed. I could afford the IVF or adoption if I wanted to, but a lot of people can’t. But then you have people below the poverty line pumping out kids and getting paid for it while middle class people are prevented from adopting/IVF to have kids they desperately want. That’s the problem.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
Italians_Invented_2A 5 points ago +6 / -1

Not many pedes know, but in European countries there is also private healthcare (in addition to the socialized one). Private healthcare in Europe tends to be much cheaper than in the US.

Americans are seriously ripped off by their healthcare system.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +3 / -2

People with unlimited money get better healthcare in the US, that is true.

But as the 99% of us have budget constraints, this is not useful to understand who is better off.

2
Grief 2 points ago +2 / -0

Except for the fact you're actually getting top of the line care in the US. Going to another country for a procedure seems insane to me from a safety perspective. Sure as hell wouldn't go to the EU for one as an American. They purposely collapsed and turned their Healthcare into a joke socializing it.

4
Soonerborn 4 points ago +4 / -0

My insurance is pretty good. My out of pocket used to be zero, after Obamacare it's about 1000 max out of pocket.

Mine covers fertility treatments. The only thing they wont cover is surrogacy. They do not cover sex change operations.

3
Friar_Pede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every time I get around liberals that don't have kids; I talk about how awful it is having kids and how I wished my wife would have got the abortions and got a hysterectomy.

They usually reply with a look of consternation. In the back of my head I'm laughing about their regret as the slip away ALONE and broken.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
SmugFrog 3 points ago +7 / -4

I'm not a fan of IVF. Sexual deviants use fertility treatments in order to bypass the laws of nature and mimic the act of giving birth. The production of offspring is the result of marital relations between one man and one woman. Anything else is a perversion that can only be achieved through unnatural means. Those who are part of a normal family unit and cannot conceive naturally due to no fault of their own should be encouraged to adopt. There's little more disturbing than the concept of test tube babies and "men" giving "birth" to children.

3
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 3 points ago +3 / -0

Def true. Just paid cash for IVF a few months ago. No insurance coverage. Still the best $ I ever spent. We r due on Valentine's day 😁

1
Leiloni 1 point ago +1 / -0

Congrats on the little 'pede in the making! :)

3
sunnyingreenfield 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hmmmm, I'll have to check ours. As of three years ago, I know both were covered under the G/VG coverage we had (have). No idea about self-mutilation tho.

0
Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +1 / -1

Only self mutilation of the genitals though.

Mutilating other body parts is still frowned upon by society. For now.

2
Pau1F01ey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pedes, if you're married, time to start going above 2.1 replacement rate!

MakeFamiliesBigAgain

(For what it's worth, my dad had eleven brothers and sisters as a youth in the 60's. Would've been more if two didn't die prematurely and between his two marriages, six kids in total)

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
D__T 2 points ago +2 / -0

I honestly believe they are trying to stop white people from reproducing

2
AbibasGopnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're not the elite. There's nothing elite about them. Stop giving them power. We're the elite, in every way.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Randy_Bo_Bandy 2 points ago +2 / -0

my wife and I are having fertility issues. Insurance covers up to 5k for infertility, but can't really afford IVF or anything...medication itself is 3.5-6k per cycle too....it's insane.

But if we did get pregnant you better believe we could have it ended for free....

2
Jsa9 2 points ago +2 / -0

What if you don't follow through with a sex change op? A free trip on your insurance premiums sounds like a good way to get them to reconsider something so absurd.

1
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Omg LOL love this idea

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ha, maybe then, an infertile couple should claim the husband wants to transition, get the female hormones for free, and then the wife uses them to get pregnant. Found the loophole!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
gormlesst 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair that might be a financial choice over a moral choice, fertility / in vitro is probably a lot more expensive than birth control

2
tr808 2 points ago +2 / -0

What’s a good health provider for pregnant ladies

2
bidens_dentures 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same. My insurance will not cover TRT for adult males but will for 14 year old girls.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
CameFromChyNah 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just checked mine. Sure enough I'm in the same boat. They do not cover fertility, which my wife and I have been paying out of pocket for, but they will certainly pay for a guy to cut his dick off. Absolutely disgusting.

2
Keizer 2 points ago +2 / -0

tbf, I would pay to sterilize a leftist

2
17echo76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our healthcare systems priorities are so backwards! This bothers me so much that even the best health care plan available social engineers the insured party by making abundant poor choices of treatment options.

1
repoman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don’t you know you do not have the right to procreate? You need a license and government approval for that!

1
minoritytrump 1 point ago +4 / -3
  1. Medical insurance paying for Abortion? I don't believe you. Check your exclusions/limitations and you'll see what I mean...
  2. Sterilization: Cost/benefit to insurers very good, since it's cheaper than one, or multiple, pregnancies and your premium is the same regardless.
  3. Sex change? Again...don't believe you. Have you checked the limitations/exclusions in your benefit summary?

Now...if your company is self-funding...they can cover whatever they are willing to pay for. But, that's YOUR company paying, not the insurer. The insurer is just providing network/processing for a fee.

BTW: You can get, at most, 50% off of in-vitro without any need for insurance if you knew what to do :-)

Repeat over and over in your head: Insurance companies are banks. They buy/sell/transfer money, and price everything based on risk. They are not moral...they are financial. Proceed accordingly.

Good luck!

5
BlondeBombshell88 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

They 100% cover abortions, sterilization, and sex change operations. It says it when I log into my portal and look at the coverage. And they 100% cover the travel for sex change as well. I have motion picture health insurance and work in the film industry, so maybe it’s weird because of that. But I saw the coverages on their website with my own eyes.

1
Independenceforever 1 point ago +1 / -0

The power of their disbelief is a shield against responsibility.

By turning yours into some strange exception maintains the lie that these insurance companies DON'T function as organized extortion and democrat leverage whenever and wherever they wish.

"Insurance". Sounds like the di Medici family invented the term after reading "The Prince".

1
MajJamesMcFarlane 1 point ago +1 / -0

Turns out having a kid is medically expensive. If you don't want to shoulder that burden, you'll likely have trouble with the kid