No, we're not going to assume the numbers are accurate. We're going to state without any question that the numbers are accurate. Here is the source of the data directly from the CBP. If you were arguing in good faith, you could have asked me for the source but you didn't and instead assumed that I didn't have a source. That's horse shit and it puts a giant stamp on your forehead saying you are a piece of shit that isn't going to argue in good faith. But I'll put that aside and be the better person and provide you with the source.
144k people crossing the border doesn't mean 144k new people here every month, forever.
Except I didn't say that. I didn't even imply that. I gave an example of a month in which we apprehended a cities worth of people just to give you some perspective about the numbers being talked about. You didn't even address this at all. You completed avoided addressing it and immediately went to trying to marginalize it. Let me put it this way, it doesn't need to be the same every month in order for it to be a problem. ONE MONTH where that many people are being apprehended should be shocking enough if you actually give a shit about facts.
It's a lot of the same people crossing back and forth, muling shit and conducting business.
Could you please provide a source for that? Until you have a source for this statement, then there's zero value in you making that statement. I have researched this already and found nothing that supports your argument here. I'll gladly accept that I'm wrong if you do have a source.
And don't tell me during global lockdown orders that an 84% reduction in traffic is due to the 50 fucking miles of wall that DJT added to the border. The border is 2,000 miles long.
I didn't tell you that. Read what I said and this time don't ignore where I said that other factors are involved. I really don't know what you hope to accomplish when you ignore my statements. Don't ignore things just because it breaks your narrative.
No, we're not going to assume the numbers are accurate. We're going to state without any question that the numbers are accurate. Here is the source of the data directly from the CBP. If you were arguing in good faith, you could have asked me for the source but you didn't and instead assumed that I didn't have a source. That's horse shit and it puts a giant stamp on your forehead saying you are a piece of shit that isn't going to argue in good faith. But I'll put that aside and be the better person and provide you with the source.
Except I didn't say that. I didn't even imply that. I gave an example of a month in which we apprehended a cities worth of people just to give you some perspective about the numbers being talked about. You didn't even address this at all. You completed avoided addressing it and immediately went to trying to marginalize it. Let me put it this way, it doesn't need to be the same every month in order for it to be a problem. ONE MONTH where that many people are being apprehended should be shocking enough if you actually give a shit about facts.
Could you please provide a source for that? Until you have a source for this statement, then there's zero value in you making that statement. I have researched this already and found nothing that supports your argument here. I'll gladly accept that I'm wrong if you do have a source.
I didn't tell you that. Read what I said and this time don't ignore where I said that other factors are involved. I really don't know what you hope to accomplish when you ignore my statements. Don't ignore things just because it breaks your narrative.