Funny not 25 miles away a young black man beat an eldery asian man TWICE, and was caught on video yelling "I hate asians" while beating an eldery asian man had his charges dropped in the name of restorative justice.
How the fuck is Soros even still alive with all the evil shit he has done to so many countries in the past/ is doing to America?
Can the white hats at the NSA not just give Russia (they want him dead or alive for crashing the Russian economy in the early 90's) his location and look the other way or something?
I know and something should be done about him too, these people are dangerous, evil, and actively hurting America.
And the fucked up thing is it's no secret everyone knows what the Soros family is doing, at the very least they and their organizations should be permanently expelled from America like other countries have done under threat to state security.
And it's not just Russia that declared that either, several south east Asian countries like Thailand and Malaysia were fucked hard by George Soros and they want him dead
What. The. Actual. Fuck. How does blatant disregard of the law and obvious favoring of one race not cause riots and protests? It's almost as if the BLM idiots are expressing OUR outrage and we're acting like they should.
That is just sick. That is truly a hate crime. But all he should get is time for the real crimes he committed and not be freed to commit more act of violence.
A mere upvote doesn’t do this comment justice. Knowing that Herbert Hoover ran on the platform “A chicken in every pot and a car in every garage” must be mentioned for full kek to be achieved!
Rule of law does matter, however, when a person of authority grants permission to this kind of behavior, who is to say what happens next?
The common sentiment is, give an inch and they want a foot. This is setting a messy and unnecessary precedent that needs to be undone, squashed and prevented from ever happening again.
Our roadways are not poster boards. We should not give permission to GRAFFITI our roadways. Permission or not, its not art. Its a roadway.
This DIANE BECTON, the Democrat DA going after the couple.
The Los Angeles Times reported Soros has dropped over $2.7 million in California DA races this election cycle, and since 2014 has spent more than $16 million in 17 county races in other states. His chosen candidates have won 13 of them.
Soros has waded into the Contra Costa County DA’s race to the tune of $275,000 backing interim Democrat DA Diana Becton.
Becton, 66, was chosen as Contra Costa County’s interim DA last September among five applicants to the position, in a narrow 3-2 vote by the county’s board of supervisors.
The choice by the board of supervisors came despite the revelation thatBecton plagiarized significant portions of her application and unlike other candidates, including Contra Costa County District Attorneys’ Association endorsed Paul Graves, has no prosecutorial experience.
Becton is the county’s first female and African American district attorney, which Soros made a top selling point in a recent mailer sent to voters throughout the county ahead of the June 5 election to decide who will take up the seat for a full term.
Dot has always had very strict rules regarding painted roadways. See the link I just provided.
In fact, some salty losers around the country have been successful using these DOT guidelines to call out the “Blue Line” painted in between the yellow lines in front of many police stations around this country.
I’m going to say the city had no right to issue a permit for that to begin with and we should be chanting “jury nullification” at their trial (for a hate crime?!!).
OK, but what are the odds that that couple actually knew that someone had gone out of their way to get a permit to paint on the street? 99.9% of these "murals" are literally just vandalism. Plus, I highly doubt any city would be giving out permits to legally vandalize public streets in the first place if it wasn't the year 2020.
I want to say that despite your downvotes, I appreciate your consistency. I believe you're correct and you're clearly acknowledging the double standard, so I'm not sure why you're getting such flak here.
Yass comrade, Drink the blm kool aidz. Thee communists we will put you in charge later. You just have to burn the place, and shoot yourself in the head first first so we can move in, i mean because systemic racism blah blah blah blah blah
Has the City ever approved a "mural" on a public street like this? What was their criteria for approving murals? I think the original permit was illegal.
When I lived in a subdivision, the house on the corner at the entrance had about 75ft of privacy fence. It was graffitied with some gang shit for about 2 weeks. I got pissed one night, took a spray can and wrote "fags" with an arrow pointing to the tag. The very next afternoon, the city graffiti removal unit was there to clean it up.
The brandishing of a weapon deserves appropriate consequences but A FUCKING HATE CRIME FOR PAINTING OVER A MARXIST message it just silly. I feel for these people, i've considered paiting over some of my towns big dumb blm murals. this makes we think twice.
If you're not drawing your pistol to shoot someone in self-defense, then what you're doing is threatening violence for the purpose of intimidation and coercion. Especially if you're the one who started the verbal altercation with a group of people, and then got out of your vehicle to confront them. I can't believe anyone would condone that, unless they're a thug or some sort of extreme anarchist. I would never draw my CCW, except for the purpose of self-defense; it has nothing to do with "pacifism." Trying to win an argument isn't a valid reason to draw down on someone.
If you feel you are in imminent danger of bodily harm, then that's a legitimate reason... but that's a pretty difficult case to make when you're the one who proactively got out of your vehicle and confronted a group of people (as is the case with the Hispanic gentlemen who was arrested). If that group was in the middle of beating on someone, then you'd have a reason to rush to the victim's defense, but as I understand it, the guy just didn't like their political message. Political disagreement isn't a legitimate reason to brandish a firearm, and to point that out doesn't make one a "pacifist." Advocating legal and responsible gun ownership isn't pacifism.
No, i believe in the law. I don't care what sides breaks it. When you say your side can do something wrong just because you happen to agree with it's ideology makes you no better than the left. In fact that's their exact hive mind mentality.
I feel like people here don't actually know what brandishing a weapon means. If you're gunna pull a gun, you pull it when you intend to use it, not to threaten with it.
I don't get the whole issue with that? I am Hispanic and also white... There are a lot of white families in South America. Especially in Uruguay and Argentina.
When I fill out government forms it asks if I am Hispanic or not under "ethnicity" and under race I cannot choose Hispanic, and 'White' is the most appropriate option under race. Not just "kinda appropriate" either. I am very obviously a white person, pale with blue eyes.
With Zimmerman it would be a lot tougher, since he isn't at all a pale person. But I do wonder what he would have to check under "race" on government forms. Like I said, Hispanic is not an option. Also, "brown" is not an option. He doesn't look very Black or Asian or Pacific Islander to me.... Perhaps they need to change the forms around.
No one in America was ever described by the media as a "white Hispanic" before. They were either white or Hispanic. When the media heard that a man named "Zimmerman" had killed a young black man, they were ecstatic that they finally had what appeared to be an unjustified white-on-black murder they could use to inflame racial tensions and promote anti-white hatred, which is their obvious agenda to those paying attention. When they found out he was Hispanic, rather than let the opportunity go to waste, they cast him as a "white Hispanic."
I don't get the whole issue with that? I am Hispanic and also white.
The issue with that is that Zimmerman wasn't white by any stretch of the imagination - except for the press photos that were digitally altered to make him look whiter.
I guess the people who run mainstream media must hate white people, or intend to incite racial violence. Probably both.
That's very true. I agree that I would not call Zimmerman a white person at a glance.
However, I do wonder what he could be better classified as, using the options given on government forms. You have to choose a race, and Hispanic is not an option.
Which of the following "Races" would you check, if you were him?
-American Indian or Alaska Native
-Asian
-Black or African American
-Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
-White
Those are the choices. And then in a separate box, called "Ethnicity" you have the following choices:
-Hispanic or Latino
-Not Hispanic or Latino
You see the problem? Almost ALL Hispanic or Latino people are going to have to choose "White" unless they have extremely dark skin and identify as Black. But there really aren't many Hispanic people that are actually that dark, and the other choices of race are even less likely to match very well.
To be fair, painting "Black Lives Matter" is commonplace graffiti all over the country, not exactly easy to distinguish "lawful" graffiti that was permitted from some woke morons on the city council from the traditional unlawful graffiti when they saying the same thing in the same place.
It is unpopular because people are too scared to realize the scale of the enemy we are against. Most people do not want to consider how bad things truly are.
Regarding the large picture problems we're facing, I agree - specifically, the deep state/Russia conspiracy, big tech Silicon Valley monopolies, and pederasts.
On the more tactical / day to day AG responsibilities, I think he's been decent. He prevented Flynn from getting railroaded. He is ostensibly bringing charges against some of the Antifa goons. He stood up for religious first amendment rights when states were/are looking to discriminate against religious expression with lock downs.
Overall, he's not terrible. Light years better than any Obama appointee, and an improvement over Sessions.
If you are viewing him in a vacuum against a Democrat then I agree with you he is okay. I am evaluating him based on the current situation and our needs therein. There is massive government corruption at all levels. In his own DOJ, FBI, and every other federal agency. There are billionaires that run international industrial child rape organizations. There is economic corruption raiding the wealth of our nation. Our rights are being systematically stripped from us, and his DOJ and FBI are leading the charge. Literal communist terrorist organizations operate in every major city in this country. The Chinese are raiding our intellectual property, buying our politicians, and spying on our citizens. Every single politician other than Trump is being paid by billionaires to betray us. Given this situation, I simply can not accept a decent attorney general. Barr is not good enough. He is not doing enough. We can not accept this level of justice in our country. Bill Barr needs to step the fuck up or step down.
My guess? They could, but it would be very complicated. Soros is surrounded by his own literal private army. And, of course, he's got his nasty fingers in every pie on the whole damn planet.
We’re in Cold War II. The liberals are desperate for it to turn hot. They think we’re dumb, but we know that if divided, China will be unleashed to fill the vacuum. Fuck them all with a 1000 infected Winnie the Poo dicks.
What we need to realize is that we fucked the commie bastards in Cold War I, and we’ll fuck them again in Cold War II. We had and used tools to win the 1st one and we’ll do the same for this one. One of our biggest tools is making them live up to their own standards. We’re doing that right now to great affect, and we’ll only get better as the left descends further into clown world.
On the contrary. This gives the term a new and powerful meaning. It essentially sets the precedent that any crimes committed by whites are hate crimes.
Lawyers cost a lot of money, The prosecution itself is the punishment. Very different paying a fine for vandalism, than having to hire an attorney fro criminal defense
A fair court would throw it out. The left has already solved for that problem. There is not justice in this country for White people. Only persecution. They will be lucky to ever see the light of day again.
Not everyone can afford a lawyer. Overcharging is a tactic used by the state to wear down the poor subjects. Its similar to frivolous lawsuits filed by corporations.
That's the problem with our side, we don't protect/support the few of us that are out in the real world doing things. That discourages others that want to do something. Sad.
That is part of the correct response to this. It will take months to coordinate support the way the Soros/China backed Maoists have. They have spent years preparing for this.
This is so bullshit! So now it’s a hate crime to cover up a political slogan, but if we were insane enough to spray paint MAGA anywhere in our towns, you best believe our asses would be thrown in the clink
Then EVERY statue that’s been torn down is a hate crime.
Let’s start up a fund to bail these people out and then start the process of righting the Republic.
This bullshit has gone far enough. Heads need to roll including all the treasonous elected officials who have let their cities burn, terrorize their citizens and then refuse to prosecute the terrorists.
The courts are as corrupt as any part of the Government that rules over us. If they find a lawyer and that lawyer fights too hard they will get disbarred. You watch, these two are going to go down hard and for a long time. They are trying to make and example out of these people so White people learn not to fight back.
It certainly shouldn't be endorsed by a government agency, and should definitely not be painted in front of a courthouse. I don't want either a divisive racist statement, or a marxist terrorist organization, associated with the legal system, thank you.
Given that the painter had a permit - okay... it's legally permitted. I have a fundamental disagreement with that decision though; see above. Legally speaking, covering it up may be a crime, but as others have said, "hate crime" is BS, and it certainly wasn't violent, or a violation of civil rights.
"“We must address the root and byproduct of systemic racism in our country. The Black Lives Matter movement is an important civil rights cause that deserves all of our attention,” stated Contra Costa County District Attorney Diana Becton. "
The district attorney has thus shown public bias against the defendants, and the case should be moved to another district, at the very least.
“We must address the root and byproduct of systemic racism in our country. The Black Lives Matter movement is an important civil rights cause that deserves all of our attention,” stated Contra Costa County District Attorney Diana Becton.
The painting was done with a permit, so painting over it is not nice. But a hate crime? That's bullshit.
Painting the mural was a hate crime against every White person in this country. Systemic racism is nothing more than an anti-white blood libel. Destroying that mural was moral, correct, and courageous. Take your cuckhold fetish elsewhere.
Yes, it was moral, correct and courageous. It is also expected to receive a fine for vandalism when destroying a painting that had a permit. Nothing more, nothing less. They're trying to make an example out of every white person who dares defending themselves, but you're reaching conclusions about me without any basis.
If you do not want to be called a cuck then you need to stop cucking. There is no middle ground with our enemies. If you grant that it "wasn't nice" you are granting the premise that they did something wrong. If there is a law against destroying that hate mural then the law is wrong. These people deserve a medal for what they did. We do not need to hear anything about how nice or not you think it is. Stop giving people that hate you and want you dead the benefit of the doubt. Stop cucking, if you can.
It's not cucking, it's reality. What he did was justified, but expecting to not get charged with vandalism is stupid and unrealistic. He should've at least been smart about it. I don't care about what you think you need to hear or not, so again, get your panties off a bunch and reading too much into things just so you can justify your anger. Get mental help, if you can.
They did get a permit to paint the mural. Maybe they shouldn't have been granted the permit and i applaud them for painting over it, which may be a legitimate crime. But this is not a hate crime. The Left is so desperate for hate crimes they are just looking for any other charge they can though that on top of.
They are trying to make an example of dissenters. Everything a White person does of any political consequence will be treated as a hate crime from now on.
The DA is a grandstanding fucking idiot. She'll end up dropping that stupid charge.
Meanwhile, someone should take these cities to court over using public taxpayer-paid for streets as a billboard for a political, ideological organization. That isn't appropriate or okay.
Just imagine the screeching if a town with a conservative govt allowed street slogans supporting the NRA, or a Right to Life group.
The people who painted the mural had a permit. Those who painted over it, should be facing a simple "defacing public property" charge, not the hate crime BS. Not shocked this is in San Francisco.
Paint on a road is subject to wear and tear from tires, abrasives, and environmental factors. It would be a shame if future road markings were subject to advanced wear testing by way of tire burnouts.
This is what happens when Soros buys DA elections. A reasonable DA wouldnt have even thought of charging them, but this commie twat can do whatever she wants.
How can it be a "hAtE CriMe" when BLM is not about black people to begin with, and is nothing more then an "innocent" looking front to trick the useful idiots.
“Another resident applied for a permit on July 1 to paint the Black Lives Matter mural in front of the Wakefield Taylor Courthouse in downtown Martinez. After getting approval, the resident painted the mural on July 4.”
How is a political statement allowed in front of the courthouse?
We need to paint black dongs interacting with the wives of politicians, actors and any leftie all over their homes.
Funny not 25 miles away a young black man beat an eldery asian man TWICE, and was caught on video yelling "I hate asians" while beating an eldery asian man had his charges dropped in the name of restorative justice.
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/charges-dropped-in-robbery-of-older-asian-san-francisco-man/2246142/
Well obviously. Blacks are immune to racism, what makes you think hate isn't included in the list of vices that Blacks are impervious to?
You get to become a professor after a murder charge and your son a DA of a major city when you are apart of the uh club.
McCarthy was right.
How the fuck is Soros even still alive with all the evil shit he has done to so many countries in the past/ is doing to America?
Can the white hats at the NSA not just give Russia (they want him dead or alive for crashing the Russian economy in the early 90's) his location and look the other way or something?
Why is the US government protecting him?
His son is just as evil though.
I know and something should be done about him too, these people are dangerous, evil, and actively hurting America.
And the fucked up thing is it's no secret everyone knows what the Soros family is doing, at the very least they and their organizations should be permanently expelled from America like other countries have done under threat to state security.
And it's not just Russia that declared that either, several south east Asian countries like Thailand and Malaysia were fucked hard by George Soros and they want him dead
What percentage of American district attorneys are fueled by Sorosbux? It seems like they all are somehow. Insidious
What. The. Actual. Fuck. How does blatant disregard of the law and obvious favoring of one race not cause riots and protests? It's almost as if the BLM idiots are expressing OUR outrage and we're acting like they should.
That is just sick. That is truly a hate crime. But all he should get is time for the real crimes he committed and not be freed to commit more act of violence.
Wong dong
"A Large Cock on Every Carport" shall be our slogan
A mere upvote doesn’t do this comment justice. Knowing that Herbert Hoover ran on the platform “A chicken in every pot and a car in every garage” must be mentioned for full kek to be achieved!
I don't like to dumb anything down unless I have to. Thanks for knowing your history!
This. I'm thinking we go at least 3'x5' with balls the size of Spez's head
They are really stretching the definition of 'mural'. It is giant yellow stenciled letters in the middle of a street.
(Big Mike’s dong has entered the chatroom)
5 minutes later...
(The rest of Big Mike has entered the chatroom)
Anyone who painted over their graffiti from the peaceful mobs, should be in jail then.
And the statues were just grown in place? They were granted permits and paid for by the communities too.
Don't see a lot of fucks being given them.
Would love to know how it goes.
I missed all the arrests and hate crime charges when they removed abolitionist statutes too.
Actually, about half the country disputes it.
Rule of law does matter, however, when a person of authority grants permission to this kind of behavior, who is to say what happens next?
The common sentiment is, give an inch and they want a foot. This is setting a messy and unnecessary precedent that needs to be undone, squashed and prevented from ever happening again.
Our roadways are not poster boards. We should not give permission to GRAFFITI our roadways. Permission or not, its not art. Its a roadway.
It might make the road slippery when wet too.
It's the "hate crime" part of it that I have a serious problem with.
I don’t see the jacobins honoring the rule of law and, for them, the law doesn’t just have no bite or teeth but no damn bark too!
This DIANE BECTON, the Democrat DA going after the couple.
The Los Angeles Times reported Soros has dropped over $2.7 million in California DA races this election cycle, and since 2014 has spent more than $16 million in 17 county races in other states. His chosen candidates have won 13 of them.
Soros has waded into the Contra Costa County DA’s race to the tune of $275,000 backing interim Democrat DA Diana Becton.
Becton, 66, was chosen as Contra Costa County’s interim DA last September among five applicants to the position, in a narrow 3-2 vote by the county’s board of supervisors.
The choice by the board of supervisors came despite the revelation that Becton plagiarized significant portions of her application and unlike other candidates, including Contra Costa County District Attorneys’ Association endorsed Paul Graves, has no prosecutorial experience.
Becton is the county’s first female and African American district attorney, which Soros made a top selling point in a recent mailer sent to voters throughout the county ahead of the June 5 election to decide who will take up the seat for a full term.
http://antiochherald.com/2018/05/27ah1da/
.
Still goes against DOT regulations.
https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/services/publications/fhwaop02090/index.htm
Unless they claim that the markings were “to alert motorists of dangerous conditions ahead”. Lmao!
Dot has always had very strict rules regarding painted roadways. See the link I just provided.
In fact, some salty losers around the country have been successful using these DOT guidelines to call out the “Blue Line” painted in between the yellow lines in front of many police stations around this country.
I’m going to say the city had no right to issue a permit for that to begin with and we should be chanting “jury nullification” at their trial (for a hate crime?!!).
I’m proud of those two for standing up.
It's not a mural. It is a slogan.
It's propaganda. People are just repeating it now without even understanding what they're parroting.
A permit to graffiti over road signage (stop)? Makes sense.
I do not see a White Lives Matter mural beinf approved.
The hate crime was allowing the racist Black Lives Matter mural.
Here's the thing, only one side here is being required to act lawful. That's the problem.
OK, but what are the odds that that couple actually knew that someone had gone out of their way to get a permit to paint on the street? 99.9% of these "murals" are literally just vandalism. Plus, I highly doubt any city would be giving out permits to legally vandalize public streets in the first place if it wasn't the year 2020.
Can't argue that. Hate crime though? Not in the least from the looks of it.
It makes it "civil disobedence"...unheard voices etc.
Jesus Christ, dude, can you even hear yourself? You're endorsing anarcho-tyranny. This is "when you kill your enemies, they win" level nonsense.
I want to say that despite your downvotes, I appreciate your consistency. I believe you're correct and you're clearly acknowledging the double standard, so I'm not sure why you're getting such flak here.
Because acknowledging double standards is useless. They don't care that they're being hypocrites. They enjoy flexing on us.
Gotcha, no worries 👍
Yass comrade, Drink the blm kool aidz. Thee communists we will put you in charge later. You just have to burn the place, and shoot yourself in the head first first so we can move in, i mean because systemic racism blah blah blah blah blah
Has the City ever approved a "mural" on a public street like this? What was their criteria for approving murals? I think the original permit was illegal.
The City should have contacted their residents that they approved graffiti-like "mural" on public roads.
When I lived in a subdivision, the house on the corner at the entrance had about 75ft of privacy fence. It was graffitied with some gang shit for about 2 weeks. I got pissed one night, took a spray can and wrote "fags" with an arrow pointing to the tag. The very next afternoon, the city graffiti removal unit was there to clean it up.
Lmao. I'll have to remember that in case I ever need any graffiti removed. I've heard dicks by potholes work as well.
The brandishing of a weapon deserves appropriate consequences but A FUCKING HATE CRIME FOR PAINTING OVER A MARXIST message it just silly. I feel for these people, i've considered paiting over some of my towns big dumb blm murals. this makes we think twice.
given what I have seen, I find it highly unlikely he brandished the firearm for no reason
If that's the case then he should have taken the shot. You can't just brandish a weapon to threaten people.
Court Jester Republicanism
Yup, completely agree
If you're not drawing your pistol to shoot someone in self-defense, then what you're doing is threatening violence for the purpose of intimidation and coercion. Especially if you're the one who started the verbal altercation with a group of people, and then got out of your vehicle to confront them. I can't believe anyone would condone that, unless they're a thug or some sort of extreme anarchist. I would never draw my CCW, except for the purpose of self-defense; it has nothing to do with "pacifism." Trying to win an argument isn't a valid reason to draw down on someone.
Alternately you are informing them of deadly consequences if they attack you.
If you feel you are in imminent danger of bodily harm, then that's a legitimate reason... but that's a pretty difficult case to make when you're the one who proactively got out of your vehicle and confronted a group of people (as is the case with the Hispanic gentlemen who was arrested). If that group was in the middle of beating on someone, then you'd have a reason to rush to the victim's defense, but as I understand it, the guy just didn't like their political message. Political disagreement isn't a legitimate reason to brandish a firearm, and to point that out doesn't make one a "pacifist." Advocating legal and responsible gun ownership isn't pacifism.
No, i believe in the law. I don't care what sides breaks it. When you say your side can do something wrong just because you happen to agree with it's ideology makes you no better than the left. In fact that's their exact hive mind mentality.
I feel like people here don't actually know what brandishing a weapon means. If you're gunna pull a gun, you pull it when you intend to use it, not to threaten with it.
With all the recent violence committed during BLM riots there should be absolutely no punishment for simply brandishing a weapon in their presence,
Have also considered and rethinking
He must be a white Hispanic /s
Hold up, hold up, I'm told that's not sarcastic at all, but real life.
https://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/10/justice/florida-zimmerman-backlash/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
"Zimmerman is a white Hispanic who is on trial for last year's shooting death of Trayvon Martin"
Ya, that was BEFORE they thought community led security instead of cops was a good idea.
Now they would totally support Zimmerman, I’m sure.....
I don't get the whole issue with that? I am Hispanic and also white... There are a lot of white families in South America. Especially in Uruguay and Argentina.
When I fill out government forms it asks if I am Hispanic or not under "ethnicity" and under race I cannot choose Hispanic, and 'White' is the most appropriate option under race. Not just "kinda appropriate" either. I am very obviously a white person, pale with blue eyes.
With Zimmerman it would be a lot tougher, since he isn't at all a pale person. But I do wonder what he would have to check under "race" on government forms. Like I said, Hispanic is not an option. Also, "brown" is not an option. He doesn't look very Black or Asian or Pacific Islander to me.... Perhaps they need to change the forms around.
No one in America was ever described by the media as a "white Hispanic" before. They were either white or Hispanic. When the media heard that a man named "Zimmerman" had killed a young black man, they were ecstatic that they finally had what appeared to be an unjustified white-on-black murder they could use to inflame racial tensions and promote anti-white hatred, which is their obvious agenda to those paying attention. When they found out he was Hispanic, rather than let the opportunity go to waste, they cast him as a "white Hispanic."
The issue with that is that Zimmerman wasn't white by any stretch of the imagination - except for the press photos that were digitally altered to make him look whiter.
I guess the people who run mainstream media must hate white people, or intend to incite racial violence. Probably both.
That's very true. I agree that I would not call Zimmerman a white person at a glance.
However, I do wonder what he could be better classified as, using the options given on government forms. You have to choose a race, and Hispanic is not an option.
Which of the following "Races" would you check, if you were him?
-American Indian or Alaska Native
-Asian
-Black or African American
-Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
-White
Those are the choices. And then in a separate box, called "Ethnicity" you have the following choices:
-Hispanic or Latino
-Not Hispanic or Latino
You see the problem? Almost ALL Hispanic or Latino people are going to have to choose "White" unless they have extremely dark skin and identify as Black. But there really aren't many Hispanic people that are actually that dark, and the other choices of race are even less likely to match very well.
Thanks for explaining the subtlety.
We definitely need better categories in the form.
Have they arrested the shooters at the BLM mob who killed that little girl last weekend?
🤡 🌍
The people who did had a permit to do it.
To be fair, painting "Black Lives Matter" is commonplace graffiti all over the country, not exactly easy to distinguish "lawful" graffiti that was permitted from some woke morons on the city council from the traditional unlawful graffiti when they saying the same thing in the same place.
In this case, a woke official gave them a permit, but yeah, most of it everywhere else is graffiti.
So we can pull a similar permit and be allowed to paint "Trump 2020" on public streets? Or has equal justice under the law been suspended as well?
You should be as long as its not within 1000 feet of a polling place on Election Day. If they don't let you and they've let BLM, you sue. You win.
AG Barr is aware of these Soros DAs causing anarcho-tyranny. In an interview with Laura Ingraham (I think it was her) Barr called him out by name.
Sure wish he would do something about it now. I'm tired of this crap.
OlDirtyBarrister for AG!
👍👍
Bill Barr will never do anything. His job is to do as little as possible to keep his job until Trump is out of office.
It is unpopular because people are too scared to realize the scale of the enemy we are against. Most people do not want to consider how bad things truly are.
if only they knew how bad things really are
I keep telling people that but they don't want to hear it.
I congratulate for doing a background check on him.
Nobody who supports can answer this question: What in his track record shows that he ever went with criminal charges after anyone in government?
Regarding the large picture problems we're facing, I agree - specifically, the deep state/Russia conspiracy, big tech Silicon Valley monopolies, and pederasts.
On the more tactical / day to day AG responsibilities, I think he's been decent. He prevented Flynn from getting railroaded. He is ostensibly bringing charges against some of the Antifa goons. He stood up for religious first amendment rights when states were/are looking to discriminate against religious expression with lock downs.
Overall, he's not terrible. Light years better than any Obama appointee, and an improvement over Sessions.
If you are viewing him in a vacuum against a Democrat then I agree with you he is okay. I am evaluating him based on the current situation and our needs therein. There is massive government corruption at all levels. In his own DOJ, FBI, and every other federal agency. There are billionaires that run international industrial child rape organizations. There is economic corruption raiding the wealth of our nation. Our rights are being systematically stripped from us, and his DOJ and FBI are leading the charge. Literal communist terrorist organizations operate in every major city in this country. The Chinese are raiding our intellectual property, buying our politicians, and spying on our citizens. Every single politician other than Trump is being paid by billionaires to betray us. Given this situation, I simply can not accept a decent attorney general. Barr is not good enough. He is not doing enough. We can not accept this level of justice in our country. Bill Barr needs to step the fuck up or step down.
he will never do a thing. it's up to the people
My guess? They could, but it would be very complicated. Soros is surrounded by his own literal private army. And, of course, he's got his nasty fingers in every pie on the whole damn planet.
Anyway, yeah. Something's got to give.
Lol at thinking the facilitation of the controlled demolition of the United States isn’t Israel’s top priority at the moment
There's no upside for Israel to facilitate the destruction of the US. What do you think keeps the barbarians at bay besides the US
Pretty hard to do something when they are legally elected
Yeah, it was so difficult to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the legally elected president.
I can't think of a Bay Area county that I don't just assume is swimming in Soros dollars. It's disgusting
Go figure, dems complain about Citizens United but don't make a peep about SpeechNOW.org being allowed to take in unlimited donations.
DA needs a the same response the Patriots gave the British at Concord.
Hispanics are white - haven’t you heard?
We’re in Cold War II. The liberals are desperate for it to turn hot. They think we’re dumb, but we know that if divided, China will be unleashed to fill the vacuum. Fuck them all with a 1000 infected Winnie the Poo dicks.
What we need to realize is that we fucked the commie bastards in Cold War I, and we’ll fuck them again in Cold War II. We had and used tools to win the 1st one and we’ll do the same for this one. One of our biggest tools is making them live up to their own standards. We’re doing that right now to great affect, and we’ll only get better as the left descends further into clown world.
The commies came here after Cold War 1
"They had a permit to come into my home and take my firearms. Thems the rules. But I love the 2nd amendment."
Fuck that, they did nothing wrong.
painting BLM on a public road already is vandalism
When will the people who defaced public property in the first place be charged with inciting hate?
The city gave them a fucking permit to paint it. 🤡
The mayor of clown town needs to face charges for allowing a divisive hate group advertise in a public place.
Only White people are subject to laws. If you arrest a jogger it is a hate crime.
Trying to return to the old normal is a crime. They tried to make that street great again and now are paying for it.
Lol, a hate crime...
This is going to basically make the term meaningless.
It was meaningless to begin with, but yes. Nobody commits crime with love on their mind.
If this were even a crime, it's nothing more than vandalism, if anything.
You can't fucking tack hate crime charges on when the 'victim' is no one and nothing but a paved road.
They can and they are. The only question left is what are we going to do about it.
Probably absolutely nothing as has been par for the last 3.5 years.
No it won't. They are just going to use it as a weapon against all White people that stand up against this. No one is doing anything to stop them.
I've reported this comment for a hate crime.
Too late.
On the contrary. This gives the term a new and powerful meaning. It essentially sets the precedent that any crimes committed by whites are hate crimes.
Any lawyer worth anything will get that tossed out. Whose civil rights were violated, exactly? Roads do not have civil rights.
It's petty fucking vandalism, lol.
Lawyers cost a lot of money, The prosecution itself is the punishment. Very different paying a fine for vandalism, than having to hire an attorney fro criminal defense
A fair court would throw it out. The left has already solved for that problem. There is not justice in this country for White people. Only persecution. They will be lucky to ever see the light of day again.
Contra Costa County jury will be cucked. Maximum sentence incoming
why are you being downvoted? a bunch of anti white punks around here?
Most boomer Whites that support Trump still want to pretend that this isn't happening because the truth is too scary for them.
no doubt about it.
Not everyone can afford a lawyer. Overcharging is a tactic used by the state to wear down the poor subjects. Its similar to frivolous lawsuits filed by corporations.
I get it.
Someone will probably pro-bono the case since it's absurd bullshit.
One can hope.
Violation of civil rights is what they are doing to us with these shut downs
It's OK to be white.
I'm proud to be white.
Same
And while the thousands of Black on White violent hate crimes go absolutely ignored and UNCHARGED.
These two deserve the support and defense of EVERY patriotic American.
Fuck the real fascists anti-American traitors -- Democrats
Sadly, you are way more accurate than not.
The Democratic party needs to be completely crushed electorally and judicially. If that fails, by force
That's the problem with our side, we don't protect/support the few of us that are out in the real world doing things. That discourages others that want to do something. Sad.
I want to use my boom boom stick...
That is part of the correct response to this. It will take months to coordinate support the way the Soros/China backed Maoists have. They have spent years preparing for this.
It isnt Maoists. It is Bolshevik.
+The lawyer and his wife in St Louis
Seriously, don't give a fuck about them, they were all about the movement when they were pocketing big cash from it
Chinese and Muslims arent behind this. Soros is though.
The funding is coming from well connected communists here in the US. Rosenburg and Soros are 2 big names.
Its the Bolsheviks.
This is so bullshit! So now it’s a hate crime to cover up a political slogan, but if we were insane enough to spray paint MAGA anywhere in our towns, you best believe our asses would be thrown in the clink
Anything a White person does is a hate crime in Cali. It is just whether or not a POC wants to press the issue.
That’s so f’d up. California needs some good ol’ MAGA governor.
Maybe it's time we get permits to paint MAGA everywhere? How about white lives matter? It's a hate crime if they cover it up.
Yep, and that's why there will be war.
We will win
I know we will. But after the win, we have to dismantle our public education system or we will be right back here in 20 years
Yep even Alex Jones is more worried than usual about how bad things could get.
exactly right.
Wouldn't it be nice if conservative judge were as passionate about helping us.
there are no conservative judges lol
They're too worried about their public image rather than defending the constitution and law and order.
This is BS!
Then EVERY statue that’s been torn down is a hate crime.
Let’s start up a fund to bail these people out and then start the process of righting the Republic.
This bullshit has gone far enough. Heads need to roll including all the treasonous elected officials who have let their cities burn, terrorize their citizens and then refuse to prosecute the terrorists.
I will not allow this nation to fall on my watch
The courts are as corrupt as any part of the Government that rules over us. If they find a lawyer and that lawyer fights too hard they will get disbarred. You watch, these two are going to go down hard and for a long time. They are trying to make and example out of these people so White people learn not to fight back.
At this point the bad actors deserve to be put in the dirt
Black lives matter is an NGO not a statement.
And a violent Marxist ideology is a retarded concept, not a race of people.
It certainly shouldn't be endorsed by a government agency, and should definitely not be painted in front of a courthouse. I don't want either a divisive racist statement, or a marxist terrorist organization, associated with the legal system, thank you. Given that the painter had a permit - okay... it's legally permitted. I have a fundamental disagreement with that decision though; see above. Legally speaking, covering it up may be a crime, but as others have said, "hate crime" is BS, and it certainly wasn't violent, or a violation of civil rights.
"“We must address the root and byproduct of systemic racism in our country. The Black Lives Matter movement is an important civil rights cause that deserves all of our attention,” stated Contra Costa County District Attorney Diana Becton. "
The district attorney has thus shown public bias against the defendants, and the case should be moved to another district, at the very least.
They hold power by the thinnest of threads. Wont take much to depose them, but it does require some organization and material support.
The district attorney should be dragged out of her house and violently beaten until dead
not gonna happen.
Rules for thee, not for me.
“We must address the root and byproduct of systemic racism in our country. The Black Lives Matter movement is an important civil rights cause that deserves all of our attention,” stated Contra Costa County District Attorney Diana Becton.
The painting was done with a permit, so painting over it is not nice. But a hate crime? That's bullshit.
Painting the mural was a hate crime against every White person in this country. Systemic racism is nothing more than an anti-white blood libel. Destroying that mural was moral, correct, and courageous. Take your cuckhold fetish elsewhere.
Get a grip and your panties off a bunch.
Yes, it was moral, correct and courageous. It is also expected to receive a fine for vandalism when destroying a painting that had a permit. Nothing more, nothing less. They're trying to make an example out of every white person who dares defending themselves, but you're reaching conclusions about me without any basis.
If you do not want to be called a cuck then you need to stop cucking. There is no middle ground with our enemies. If you grant that it "wasn't nice" you are granting the premise that they did something wrong. If there is a law against destroying that hate mural then the law is wrong. These people deserve a medal for what they did. We do not need to hear anything about how nice or not you think it is. Stop giving people that hate you and want you dead the benefit of the doubt. Stop cucking, if you can.
It's not cucking, it's reality. What he did was justified, but expecting to not get charged with vandalism is stupid and unrealistic. He should've at least been smart about it. I don't care about what you think you need to hear or not, so again, get your panties off a bunch and reading too much into things just so you can justify your anger. Get mental help, if you can.
dude go post somewhere else if you are gonna defend the system and people that want my family dead.
Read the comment again, I'm not defending anything, just quoting the pathetic excuse of a DA.
You said "painting over it is not nice" Fuck off with that shit. Painting over it was moral and just. Stop defending these evil people.
"Not nice" as in "It can and has been construed as vandalism". I hope he gets acquitted but expecting to not get charged is stupid.
Wow fuck everything about that
Sounds about right for 🤡🌍
HOW IS THE MURAL NOT HATE SPEECH ITSELF?
It is. Black people are allowed to commit hate crimes against Whites.
Uh, did you miss the part where BLM got shut down for criticizing Israel?
Gunning down little girls? Liberals sleep.
Painting over graffiti? Real shit.
Why did they allow a mural in the middle of the road and over top safety markings?
Charged for "Violating Civil Rights"
Lol, Fuck you!
They have all the power. They can and are doing what they want with it.
God bless them. They are true hero's. Thank you for fighting for our country Patriots!
CONSERVATIVE GOFUNDME EQUIVALENT NOW
I don’t understand why no conservative has funded one.
I r a programmer by trade and can help set one up if needed.
Dude, do it. Don't know much about that but if you could pull it off, holy shit, would make gfm look like a lemonade stand.
What are we going to do about it.
Jury nullification?
Seems unlikely that we would get selected for the jury, but if I do you can bet they walk.
"What're you in for?"
"Cleaning graffiti."
.
They did get a permit to paint the mural. Maybe they shouldn't have been granted the permit and i applaud them for painting over it, which may be a legitimate crime. But this is not a hate crime. The Left is so desperate for hate crimes they are just looking for any other charge they can though that on top of.
They are trying to make an example of dissenters. Everything a White person does of any political consequence will be treated as a hate crime from now on.
Every quote from the DA in that article makes it clear they are just a political activist.
SPEZ: not to mention that this is a glaring example of selective prosecution. How many rioters were charged by the same DA?
The DA is a grandstanding fucking idiot. She'll end up dropping that stupid charge.
Meanwhile, someone should take these cities to court over using public taxpayer-paid for streets as a billboard for a political, ideological organization. That isn't appropriate or okay.
Just imagine the screeching if a town with a conservative govt allowed street slogans supporting the NRA, or a Right to Life group.
Is this not the equivalent of tearing down a statue or spray painting it red? Why is CNN not defending?
Because CNN hates White people.
Hate crime is thought crime. The concept itself is completely un-American.
Are the terrorists tearing down statues being charged with hate crimes as well?
Why do hate crimes and hate speech laws only apply to white people?
next time they need to drop paint filled balloons from a drone 🎈
Same charges.
How can a drone be racist🤔
The people who painted the mural had a permit. Those who painted over it, should be facing a simple "defacing public property" charge, not the hate crime BS. Not shocked this is in San Francisco.
But black lives matter literally said they were marxists...that’s a hate crime?
Hate crime is not a thing
Seriously hate this. Time to fight pedes
Paint on a road is subject to wear and tear from tires, abrasives, and environmental factors. It would be a shame if future road markings were subject to advanced wear testing by way of tire burnouts.
But..but... that would leave black marks
This is what happens when Soros buys DA elections. A reasonable DA wouldnt have even thought of charging them, but this commie twat can do whatever she wants.
Burn, Loot, Murder; The Marxist Cult.
How can it be a "hAtE CriMe" when BLM is not about black people to begin with, and is nothing more then an "innocent" looking front to trick the useful idiots.
just find some crack heads give 20$ each for painting over a BLM sign = checkmate
"GoFund" these Patriots
“Another resident applied for a permit on July 1 to paint the Black Lives Matter mural in front of the Wakefield Taylor Courthouse in downtown Martinez. After getting approval, the resident painted the mural on July 4.”
How is a political statement allowed in front of the courthouse?