OK, but what are the odds that that couple actually knew that someone had gone out of their way to get a permit to paint on the street? 99.9% of these "murals" are literally just vandalism. Plus, I highly doubt any city would be giving out permits to legally vandalize public streets in the first place if it wasn't the year 2020.
I do not see a White Lives Matter mural beinf approved.
The hate crime was allowing the racist Black Lives Matter mural.
Here's the thing, only one side here is being required to act lawful. That's the problem.
OK, but what are the odds that that couple actually knew that someone had gone out of their way to get a permit to paint on the street? 99.9% of these "murals" are literally just vandalism. Plus, I highly doubt any city would be giving out permits to legally vandalize public streets in the first place if it wasn't the year 2020.
Can't argue that. Hate crime though? Not in the least from the looks of it.
My bad. I missed that. So we agree in part.
A fine should be enough for the couple, but progressive (communist) DA's need that Hate Crime win on their resumes.
It makes it "civil disobedence"...unheard voices etc.
Jesus Christ, dude, can you even hear yourself? You're endorsing anarcho-tyranny. This is "when you kill your enemies, they win" level nonsense.