3824
Comments (365)
sorted by:
310
hocuspocusfocusjeep 310 points ago +313 / -3

It is

139
IncredibleMrE1 139 points ago +140 / -1

Absolutely

237
Art-Vandelay41 237 points ago +239 / -2

Lets be very clear here though. The President did not say he supports the Confederate flag. The President did not say he is against the Confederate flag. He said it is your right as a free American to fly the flag. God bless this President

77
deleted 77 points ago +78 / -1
150
Error404LifeNotFound 150 points ago +150 / -0

"Trump's bed sheets are the confederate flag, made with 100% hand-picked cotton" - CNN probably

86
bangbus 86 points ago +86 / -0

Antebellum cotton. Because he claims it is softer.

52
iamjohnwick 52 points ago +52 / -0

I fucking love this place

36
Ophelia 36 points ago +36 / -0

me too!

DTW is a lethal mix of high intelligence, rapier wit, and beevis and butthead humor.

NO PLACE ELSE LIKE THIS ON THE INTERWEBS.

31
4cupsonawall 31 points ago +31 / -0

It is antebellum cotton hand stitched from Scarlett O'Hara's draperies.

10
DaLaohu 10 points ago +10 / -0

I don't think you're allowed to reference that movie anymore.

26
midgetpornrocks 26 points ago +27 / -1

I know a black dude who refuses to take Tylenol because he's too proud to pick the cotton off of the bottle.

11
bangbus 11 points ago +11 / -0

I haven’t heard that since 1988.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
HockeyMom4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol. This is funny!

14
HistoryInvestigator 14 points ago +15 / -1

Today referred to as Lady A cotton.

14
bangbus 14 points ago +14 / -0

Hand sewn by The Chicks?

5
Spaceforcedropout 5 points ago +5 / -0

*anti-BLM cotton

2
WhoMurderedSethRich 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kek. That's really dry humor. Nice pun. 👍

6
Surefolks 6 points ago +6 / -0

Top Kek!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
mugatucrazypills 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sources familiar with his thinking

2
Guruchild 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is being reported. "By who?" By us.

3
TDAF 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cotton reclaimed from Aunt Jemima's do-rag that's on display in the Smithsonian.

2
HockeyMom4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hand-picked cotton picked by slaves!!!! REEEE!

5
tacocrusher 5 points ago +5 / -0

Literally their top story yesterday was some "analysis" that Trump was running as the last president of the Confederacy.

4
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 4 points ago +4 / -0

The equation for the optimum velocity of a fist going into Don Lemons asshole.

3
BladderBeerPoopin 3 points ago +5 / -2

CNN would say "If our assholes weren't so fucking expansive, he would be quite satisfying".

2
BoughtByBloomberg2 2 points ago +2 / -0

They said he supports the confederate flag and is a hypocrite cause he said it belongs in a museum (when asked if a state should fly it).

4
Guruchild 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shit. You're right. PACk iT IN BOYS, drunftph is finished this time!

30
deleted 30 points ago +32 / -2
5
OrenthalJamesObama 5 points ago +5 / -0

Worlds are colliding! 🤡

30
WhatWouldTrumpDoMAGA 30 points ago +30 / -0

You mean I don't need to read 1,000 miles into that statement? Are you sure he didn't mean that he worships the confederacy and wishes they rise again only to take over SpaceX and create a white supremacist stronghold on Mars?

REEEEEE NEED TENDIES MOMMY

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
5
Southern_Belle 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey -- the South WILL rise again.

It's already in progress.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-1
MapleBaconWaffles -1 points ago +1 / -2

Sending white supremacists to mars might actually be a pretty popular proposal.

0
Guruchild 0 points ago +1 / -1

It ain't like Africa is launching any rockets into space.

19
WhiskeyAndCoffee 19 points ago +19 / -0

Exactly, the left has always taken freedom of speech to crazy levels. For example, they think they can say whatever they want but as soon you have an opinion that contradicts their ideas you are immediately told to shut up and that you can't have an opinion. The President did a fantastic job and sadly the left is going to demonize him because they can.

12
AgentCovfefe22 12 points ago +12 / -0

And unfortunately for them, he was never monetized in the first place (He's not taking a salary). So what're they going to do, call him names?

4
WhiskeyAndCoffee 4 points ago +5 / -1

I do remember him saying he wasn't going to be taking the presidential salary right after he became president

2
AbibasGopnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

And he hasn't, he's been donating quarterly to various government agencies as a token of support. Things like National Park Service: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/03/us/politics/national-park-service-trump-salary.html

9
JustHereForTheSalmon 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's straight out of Rules for Radicals.

They push the limits of free speech not because they believe in freedom of speech. They do it because it's OUR rule, and the objective is to force us to adhere to OUR rules to the point where our adherence promotes our own downfall.

2
WhiskeyAndCoffee 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://youtu.be/QdUp1VLfVqo I just found this video right before reading your comment

1
CantStumpTheTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was listening to carolla the other night and usually he points out when bald bryan is full of lefty shit but didn't pick up the logic on this one.

Basically BB asked, "Well what's the big difference the people who don't want to wear a mask are the same people who said the private business shouldn't have to bake the cake; now the private business says they have to wear a mask and fighting against that, well what is it guys the private business sets the rules or not?" in his condescending lefty tone...

Well the big difference is that they were forced to bake the cake. They didn't get to actually enforce their rules; which tells me that the rules a company makes up don't matter.

16
deleted 16 points ago +17 / -1
19
bh506407 19 points ago +19 / -0

Lol but it’s such a retarded argument. It is free speech to display a swastika flag as well. Saying that dumbasses who like the Nazi flag are allowed to fly them if they wish, doesn’t mean one supports Nazism. Also, the Nazi flag is a part of German history, an enemy army that we defeated in WWII.

The Confederate flag is somewhat different, it’s a part of America’s history. To erase it is to erase our own history. And that’s wrong, no matter how much anyone dislikes the flag personally.

The men who flew the Confederate flag were Americans, just like those who flew the Union flag. And while slavery was a big part of that Civil War, many men supported that flag for many different reasons. And by the end of that war, both sides agreed to ending slavery.

Comparing the two is comparing apples to oranges and defending someone’s right to flying either flag doesn’t mean you support either of them.

The whole point of freedom of speech is to protect the speech that not everyone might want to hear or see. That way we are also free to denounce the ideas we don’t like, and make a case for the ideas we do like.

Liberals used to understand this concept. They still do, they’re just determined to destroy free speech on the internet because the truth about the current Establishment and the global Elites are spreading faster and to more people than ever before. All us plebs have instant access to information about how they’ve been screwing us for decades.

They can’t have that. So they’re using a bunch of useful morons and wannabe communists to try to eliminate freedom of speech on the internet. So they can continue to gaslight, AstroTurf, and propagandize their way to keeping their own personal puppets in control of the world’s governments and finance.

It’s as simple as that. And all this dumbass talk about erasing flags and statues and history is just the spillover of the wannabe communists being placated by the Establishment.

14
FreeAndHostile 14 points ago +14 / -0

Should be the same as the hammer and sickle. Or the ChiCom flag. Fly them if you want. Just lets me know who not to associate with.

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago +2 / -1

I would disagree with the hammer and sickle.

I really would because they want to overthrow the government.

That's where the limit should be, I think.

Say whatever you want, but when you start plotting to overthrow the very government that protects the right to say what you want, then you're in dangerous territory.

It's kind of a dilemma.

Like you want to be open-minded, but not so open that your brains fall out.

7
Dominick 7 points ago +7 / -0

But it is though.

7
The_Litehaus_Abides 7 points ago +7 / -0

True. This is the USA, not Germany.

8
ChrisSuperDude 8 points ago +8 / -0

Never forget it was the ALCU themselves that fought tooth and nail for a group of Nazis to have the right to march through a Jewish neighborhood near Chicago. Back in the 1970s when the ALCU still stood for civil rights.

40
deleted 40 points ago +40 / -0
29
deleted 29 points ago +31 / -2
28
jennyfrutex 28 points ago +29 / -1

In my experience, Stars and Bars are similar to flying a state flag for a lot of folks. It's regional pride. If we had a Midwestern flag, I'd fly that shit proudly.

25
OrenthalJamesObama 25 points ago +25 / -0

To many, myself included it means at least these two things:

*Self determination and refusal to be subjugated by an overbearing government, basically the principals of the original revolution. This is probably why they want to slander and demean the Betsy Ross flag as well. Seriously, every flag that signifies independence is attacked as racist, while the rainbow flag gets hoisted at our foreign embassies... sick!

*Honoring of family ancestors who answered the call of duty for their homeland and sacrificed to defend it. Even if they fought for the wrong team, they still deserve to be remembered for their bravery and willingness to lose everything for a higher cause. After all, it is never the soldiers that orchestrate the situations that lead to war, though they’re the ones who carry the burden of it. For the same reasons I applaud the Japanese, Germans, Vietnamese, et al who honor their warfighters, and hold no grudge that they fought for entities antithetical to our way of life.

/end rant

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
2
OrenthalJamesObama 2 points ago +3 / -1

Of course it was for the best that the north prevailed, but a shame that it had to come to war to bring the countries together. Had there not been a reunion the 20th century and everything that followed could have been much, much darker. The alternate history timelines exploring a southern victory or a permanent split are mind boggling...

4
jennyfrutex 4 points ago +4 / -0

At one of the Civil War memorials I went to as a kid, I remember the guide saying that when Lee officially surrendered at Appomattox, the Union soldiers started cheering, and Grant told them to be quiet and have some respect, because the Confederate army were their brothers and everyone who had died in the war was an American, even the ones in grey.

Hell, even Lincoln respected Lee so much he asked him to lead the Union Army. Meade was his second choice.

1
OrenthalJamesObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

That says a lot. I trust that the people who lived through that time had a better picture of things than even the greatest modern historian. If they were able to reconcile and respect, to the degree which they did, then who are we to reopen the wounds they sought to heal?

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
4
HockeyMom4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Spent lots of time growing up in the south. There were plenty of black kids that proudly displayed the confederate flag because they were southerners and had that southern pride, just like everyone else.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +3 / -7
11
Kaarous 11 points ago +12 / -1

His heritage is still worth a hell of a lot more than your worthless ass, liberal scum.

12
bangbus 12 points ago +12 / -0

The campground lots at Darlington and ‘Dega have a minimum of 10 stars and bars per row.

4
booblitchutz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Perfectly reasonable statements from a very stable genius. Media goons scream in terror.

147
deleted 147 points ago +148 / -1
57
MakeAmericaLegendary 57 points ago +61 / -4

If we have no freedom from consequences, then it isn't free.

31
deleted 31 points ago +35 / -4
-20
p8riot -20 points ago +15 / -35

No, that's absurd. The constitution only protects your speech from the government. Free speech absolutely has consequences in the real world.

34
Afrikaner_Vrystaat 34 points ago +34 / -0

In the case of big tech, section 230 has been carved out as a special handout for them just so they can accommodate speech without being punished through legal action.

If they don't support free speech I see no reason to give them that handout.

7
Southern_Belle 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't why you're getting downvoted.

You have every right to tell your boss she's an evil witch.

And she has every right to fire your behind.

People have the right to fly the confederate flag.

And other people have the right to judge them for it.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +17 / -11
-2
samhunt382482374 -2 points ago +6 / -8

...He's right though?

-12
p8riot -12 points ago +9 / -21

Try again. That's not an argument.

2
deleted 2 points ago +11 / -9
4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
-4
p8riot -4 points ago +11 / -15

Lol but you have time to make insults and say absolutely nothing.

Freedom of speech is protection from the law. Not protection "from consequences"

10
ADAM_SCHITT 10 points ago +11 / -1

Other people have freedom to not associate with you if they don't like what you say.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
MakeAmericaLegendary 3 points ago +4 / -1

From anyone. Our Bill of Rights only guarantees us these freedoms as they relate to the government. if a business restricts speech, you do not have freedom of speech under that business.

6
hit_backspace 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hurt feelings isn't illegal and it should never be. No government on Earth should be allowed to regulate speech in any way.

5
Modus_Pwninz 5 points ago +5 / -0

"What's legal is what I'm comfortable with being legal. What is legal is what I like, nothing more!"

Rights are rights. 1A especially was made so that unpopular and even hurtful speech would be allowed.

2A protects all rights, and BY GAWD would you look at that, it's damn near 2A o' clock.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
107
deleted 107 points ago +109 / -2
84
Thefirstgay 84 points ago +87 / -3

I personally don't get the attraction to the Confederate flag but no shit it should be allowed. Your faggot flags are allowed and they offend the shit out of me with the idiocy.

Nobody has the freedom from being offended.

Stay the fuck home forever and ever if you can't survive being "offended" by everything.

47
Sweitzenhammer 47 points ago +49 / -2

This^. I find the closed black BLM fist flag offensive, but so what? You have the same freedoms I do, so go ahead and fly it. I can choose not to look.

39
deleted 39 points ago +39 / -0
3
RenaissanceOfHope 3 points ago +12 / -9

u/CovfefeAndDoughnuts

The rainbow flags let LGBTQ Christians figure out where to go to church; and those opposed to it know where to avoid.

As someone in the first category, I want a church to be straightforward about their beliefs on it either way. If they disagree, I respect their honesty, leave them alone and go somewhere else.

What really makes us angry is when a church is not transparent, we invest our time and hearts, and then realize that they’re not affirming. If they clearly state that they’re not affirming from the start, I don’t care.

That’s why I use Church Clarity.

So if you don’t want a rainbow flag church, just look at the Non-Affirming churches on the Church Clarity database.

14
obamagsm 14 points ago +15 / -1

Affirming what? That they accept homosexuality as a lifestyle that's not sinful?

2
RenaissanceOfHope 2 points ago +7 / -5

Yeah, that’s what affirming would be.

I think that many wonderful Christians fall on both sides of the debate.

I also hate cancel culture, and although I’m affirming, CFA is my favorite restaurant and they do a ton of good in this world.

11
obamagsm 11 points ago +12 / -1

So biblically speaking, from what scriptures would a church justify that kind of doctrine?

Is it possible to have alcoholic, lying, gossiping, slandering, murdering, adulterer/ sexually immoral affirming churches?

Or should a church not affirm sin but teach the saving power of the gospel? You were once dead to sin but made alive in Christ? That you should die to your old sinful ways and live anew in Christ? We will all struggle with sin that's why we need a savior and his merciful grace. We all know that no one can obey the law perfectly but a church should not affirm and accept sinful behavior if someone claims to be a follower of Christ.

I am not advocating that someone who lives a LGBTQ lifestyle can not be saved. I am also not suggesting that they would not struggle with that sin the rest of their life. Jesus can save anyone. All who call on the name of the Lord will be saved. But we should display the fruits of our faith. Read the book of Roman's it has amazing doctrine about our sinful nature.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
4
RenaissanceOfHope 4 points ago +6 / -2

I agree. Most LGBTQ affirming churches have a case of Trump Derangement Syndrome which is sad.

I avoid mixing politics & faith but I would have to hide that portion of me in churches with TDS...

11
Afrikaner_Vrystaat 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's really telling that they choose to wage a war against the confederate flag and not the communist flag or black flag of islam flown by ISIS which is also flown on every other mosque in existence.

5
BetoForPrez 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol. Dangerously based.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
America_No_1 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm with this guy

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
Chopblock 6 points ago +6 / -0

Try calling it “assault speech”, you maggot-rearing red-snotted commie dick-guzzlers, nobody gives a damn about your “hate”.

99
BunnyPicnic 99 points ago +101 / -2

If you can burn the American flag, you should be able to fly any flag. Even the Nazi flag. None of us may like that, but it's true freedom.

18
NormaJeanRocks 18 points ago +19 / -1

Kayleigh should say exactly this next time they ask her about it. Perfect

15
K-Harbour 15 points ago +15 / -0

Kayleigh could also remark about the Antifa flag.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
9
p8riot 9 points ago +18 / -9

In terms of government intervention yes. You have the right to fly any flag you want. But if you fly a nazi flag proudly, that doesn't guarantee you to respect or kindness from your neighbors. Or any kind of job security, constitutionally speaking.

10
Chopblock 10 points ago +10 / -0

Under existing labor laws there are penalties for discrimination based on non-work related political speech, in some instances

5
p8riot 5 points ago +6 / -1

I suppose if the boss couldn't explicitly state "it's because of all the swastikas on your desk" they'd have to come up with an excuse

6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
5
BunnyPicnic 5 points ago +5 / -0

Of course, in the private sector. But civil rights shouldn't matter in the private sector, only in government jobs. If I don't want to hire you because you're gay, that should be my choice as the employer.

Everyone should listen to Milton Friedman. The private sector would filter all of these things out.

-2
EpicPede -2 points ago +4 / -6

weird that you are getting downvoted. I cant quite figure out why.

5
p8riot 5 points ago +8 / -3

My suspicion is it's partly ignorance, but also shills who have infiltrated here and nudging this community in a certain direction.

4
Pax11B 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was really hoping/waiting for her to say something like that.

1
brizo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Instead of Nazi they should say communist. Because communism is much worse

59
Gabriel_Dante 59 points ago +60 / -1

Left wants to be able to burn the American flag all they want, but wants the President to ban the confederate flag?

Can't have it both ways. Free speech sometimes means speech you don't want to hear.

26
SDhiker 26 points ago +26 / -0

If it's socially acceptable for a bunch of toe sucking, thong wearing dudes with tits and ball gags to parade down main street while waving dildos (televised of course) then it's socially acceptable to hang the stars and bars above my garage work bench or at a Nascar race.

Also, fuck Nascar.

15
Julius_Severus 15 points ago +15 / -0

Attacks on Confederate monuments are a Trojan Horse for attacks on the Founding Fathers and America

If Confederates were evil for being slave owning separatists then the Founding Fathers were evil for being slave owning separatists. If the Founding Fathers are evil then the nation they founded must be evil.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
desync_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Almost like they want to get rid of every flag that isn't red and yellow.

1
DeafMute 1 point ago +1 / -0

Leftists don't believe in free speech. They don't think people can be trusted to do the right thing, so the state has to do it for them.

50
BananaWizard 50 points ago +50 / -0

People have never read the constitution.

47
gamexa 47 points ago +47 / -0

But enough about the Supreme Court.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
7
nutup_orshutup 7 points ago +7 / -0

True

7
BetoForPrez 7 points ago +7 / -0

Kek

11
DapperDan 11 points ago +11 / -0

They have but that is just a "book" that they want to burn.

39
Patriot76 39 points ago +39 / -0

Just because you hate certain speech doesn’t make it hate speech. Freedom of speech is not finite.

-7
p8riot -7 points ago +7 / -14

But it is finite, the courts say so. Freedom of speech does not extend to inciting violence.

14
Chopblock 14 points ago +14 / -0

Saying “black lives matter” has incited more violence than any other phrase this year. A related sentiment even incited a civil war!

2
p8riot 2 points ago +5 / -3

People getting triggered by a phrase is different than the burden of proof according to the SCOTUS which is "clear and present danger"

5
Chopblock 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s not the speech that is finite. It is the action of violence that is illegal, or the threat of violence (“threat” not being used in a lexiconical manner of expression, but in an actionable manner of impending danger).

And the legal test requires that it be immediate, realistic, and specific — “On its face and in the circumstances in which it is made is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to the person threatened, as to convey a gravity of purpose and imminent prospect of execution.”

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/534/1020/339062/

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
0
p8riot 0 points ago +3 / -3

Everything you said it's true. I was just qualifying the incorrect statement that "freedom of speech is not finite". That is legally false as set by Schenck v. United States

3
raybiker73 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are correct. Man, it's been decades since I had college Con Law, but as I recall, Schenck boiled down to "advocacy versus action." The prof simplified it by telling us basically it's fine to say, "This city should be burned to the ground," but not so fine to say, "C'mon, let's go burn this city to the ground." A fine line sometimes, but a line nonetheless.

1
ladypatriot_games 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right. You can have a shirt that says “fuck the draft” but you can’t say “fire” in a crowded theater. I’m wondering how this translates to our time now. Unfortunately it seems like on the left you can say almost anything.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
32
NADSAQ 32 points ago +33 / -1

Free Speech isn’t for saying nice things, faggots.

8
Oback_Barama 8 points ago +8 / -0

You either believe in Freedom of Speech or legislating against Hate Speech, no middle ground.

6
123breadman 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kek, you think liberals are logical.

They would say something along the lines of "I support freedom of speech, except for being racist"

-and everyone clapped.

30
thuggishruggishtrump 30 points ago +32 / -2

As a black man I work my ass off, smoke good weed and play video games, last thing I'm going to get triggered over is a damn Confederate flag. I didn't even know people still held on to Confederate flags that's how much of a fuck I give.

People need to get their priorities straight and get triggered over more important things like top government officials having sex with children.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
Julius_Severus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Aren't you worried that statues of General Lee are going to come to life and murder you?

They do that, right?

2
thuggishruggishtrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

You reminded me of a cartoon there was an episode where two giant statues of former presidents were fighting in the middle of the city.

Forgot who and what show it was, might have been Dexter's Laboratory.

5
Oback_Barama 5 points ago +5 / -0

The kiddie diddlers in the government AND the media would rather have the unwashed masses debating about racist pancake mix and flags instead of their sexcapades thank you very much.

2
EpicPede 2 points ago +6 / -4

dude weed lmao

1
Duderufuckinkidding 1 point ago +1 / -0

LooK At ThE UnCLe ToM

^faggot leftists

MAGA on, bro.

29
tinkesquire 29 points ago +29 / -0

I agree with Trump on this issue I wished more pedes would jump on this train. Just because you don't live in the south you should join us or the next canceled flag will be yours.

17
Joeret 17 points ago +19 / -2

I’ve always been on the side of free speech for the simple reason is it allows others to see exactly who people are.

The virtuous and the depraved alike.

20
deleted 20 points ago +21 / -1
11
Julius_Severus 11 points ago +11 / -0

Ultimately I respect the martial spirit of the American Southerner. It's an important part of American history and culture. I can condemn human sacrifice while still respecting the warrior spirit of the Aztecs. The same is true of slavery and Confederate soldiers.

18
10gauge 18 points ago +18 / -0

Fact. Your feelings do not matter.

16
StaryHickory 16 points ago +16 / -0

Exactly, and it does not mean "racism" and "slavery" to those that love that flag. It's insane what people are trying to do with it.

12
Magister_Caeli 12 points ago +12 / -0

Oh man, this is gonna piss off some lefties

4
Joeret 4 points ago +5 / -1

All I can think is, “Poor Kayleigh.”

8
JimmyNelson [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

The press beating will continue until I say you have had enough. - Kayleigh

1
Ella101 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did he actually say it?

9
sustainable_saltmine 9 points ago +9 / -0

if flag burning is free speech (I will never accept it is) then someone displaying a Confederate flag is too

8
ocdpepe 8 points ago +8 / -0

I can't believe this even has to be said. Full tilt clown world. HONK HONK bitches

6
axrevolutionai 6 points ago +7 / -1

I agree with him. I do not support the Confederate flag. The Confederate south lost. It will not rise again, neither will slavery

But if your ancestors fought and died for the Confederacy, if the Confederacy is intrinsically tied to your state's history, you should be able to display or fly it freely as long as it is always beneath the one true flag worth dying for

6
MichaelDenny 6 points ago +6 / -0

I got a rebel flag. It’s got a giant marijuana leaf on it. I bought it from a black guy in Oklahoma, he owns a rebel flag store.
Fuck I love this timeline.

6
DevinNunesisahero 6 points ago +6 / -0

Please help to spread this information, I am bad at making threads (I copied my text from /pol/, bear with the capslock lol)

ABSOLUTE HAPPENING ABSOLUTE HAPPENING UN HAS DEPLOYED 10,000 DIGITAL FIRST RESPONDERS TO COMBAT "FAKE NEWS" THEY'RE ALL SHILLING THE COVID FEAR PORN AND BLM UN IS SHILLING BLM UN IS FLOODING US WITH CHINESE PROPAGANDA, SHILLING BLM AND TRYING TO ABOLISH POLICE AND MILITARY UN HAS DECLARED WAR ON THE US

Tucker (3:40): https://video.foxnews.com/v/6169011747001?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips

https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/05/1064622

ANNIHILATE THE UN! THIS IS WAR!!

2
SquidThrowFaux 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is who is behind it and managing the "truth" for volunteer shills.

https://archive.fo/pgVPk

and

https://archive.fo/aaVRr

2
DevinNunesisahero 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you!

5
DRKMSTR 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wow.

So basically republicans are now the anti-censorship party?

That's a very liberal value.

5
Diotima 5 points ago +6 / -1

Anyone who has studied the civil war knows it was never fought over slavery, Lincoln wasnt some saint he was a brutal war general, and the north offered the south a constitutional amendment to secure slavery nationwide which they didnt take (Corwin amendment). We've been fed a lie about the civil war... the north were never the good guys. They offered abolishment of slavery due to the writing on the wall saying it was politically advantageous. Dems controlled the presidency at the time.

I support the display of the Concederate Flag and I say this as a mixed race American with a Hispanic mother.

2
tufftoffee 2 points ago +2 / -0

The civil war has to be the most misunderstood war in our history.

5
deleted 5 points ago +8 / -3
2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
Econobombshell -1 points ago +1 / -2

If you want to draw the line at burning the nation's flag, you are on safe ground. Treason is not protected speech. Burning the US flag is closer to treason than art.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +5 / -8
-9
EpicPede -9 points ago +3 / -12

Based and True

-6
EpicPede -6 points ago +1 / -7

hopefully

5
Basedkyeng 5 points ago +5 / -0

The irony is the Confederate flag is the democrat flag.

5
Meatbank84 5 points ago +5 / -0

I dont even like the confederate flag. But free speech is free speech

4
Dallasguy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Durr.

I don't give a shit about the stupid rebel flag, but I damn sure won't try to take it from people who do, or ask them to justify why they do.

4
Bishop 4 points ago +4 / -0

Coming from a Southern elderpede, one who grew up watching Dukes of Hazzard, and all the reruns. The Stars and Bars was turned away from meaning anything that had to do with slavery and more about being a Southern Rebel... Some one who ran the General Lee (a car) off jumps and running from the law. People knew the history but all around me counted the flag toward being a Rebel and Southern Pride is all. Also remember back then all the States were considered their own country. The Confederates were fighting for their State/Country. The Federal Government was NOT as strong as it is today.

2
tufftoffee 2 points ago +2 / -0

States might as well be countries even still.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
BernieBro2point0 1 point ago +1 / -0

But please remember, the decision to include it on the General and the idea to include it in Lynyrd Skynyrd's image were marketing decisions from executives within the companies. Who controls the media companies? Just some food for thought

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
theRealdakkath 4 points ago +4 / -0

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

FUCK YOU SHILLS

Dont believe me? Then ask this black lady what she thinks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6PXEtrHPPQ

Or ask a black man: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHqa2uFw2Vc

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
raybiker73 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, but stop trying to inject facts into a leftist argument, they won't stand for it! LOL

4
Lawless 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is, you may not like it, but its freedom of speech.

Its sad cause i grew up with the meaning of that flag as being a rebel and nothing more. Leave it to democrats to make it racist again. So tired of their shit

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
20MagnusKonrad20 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump has gigantic gilded balls.

4
lanre 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hate crimes aren't real crimes. Either it was a crime or it wasn't. Cleaning up graffiti isn't a crime in my book.

4
MLGS 4 points ago +4 / -0

Every single person who flies a Confederate flag loves America far more than everybody howling and shrieking about how the Confederate flag is racist.

4
fingerofkek 4 points ago +4 / -0

I had to turn off Scott Adams today because he basically said there is freedom of speech except for your opinions on the confederate flag and then started rambling about how trump is throwing the election.

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago +1 / -0

He can be such a pain sometimes.

I don't listen to him anymore.

4
Taiwan_numbah_one 4 points ago +4 / -0

I disagree with what you say, but I will fight to the death your right to say it

Is what we should return to

freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences

is the most Orwellian shit ever

2
Southern_Belle 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are both true.

However, I grew up with the former.

Even as a kid, barely a teenager, we used to say that to each other: I disagree with what you say (or are about to say) but I defend to the death your right to say it. Or a variation of that.

1
Taiwan_numbah_one 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remember when Westboro Baptist Church were popular doing their thing and the general response was "well its freedom of speech". Nobody was trying to cancel any of them.

3
ThomasJefferson1776 3 points ago +5 / -2

Confederate soldiers are de facto US vets. They should be respected just the same as any other US soldier, by denying them the respect, you are denying every other soldier respect.

It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with the Confederacy.

2
tufftoffee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you. I think confederate soldiers should be in the garden of heroes so they have a place where they are safe. I fear it won't happen though.

3
Skywise 3 points ago +4 / -1

Okay - time for payback.

Somebody needs to get permission paint a confederate flag on DC on the SAME STREET that gave permission to paint Black Lives Matter.

It HAS to be allowed and if it's painted over - it's a hate crime.

Make them own their own rules!

3
Muh_Wailing_MXbabies 3 points ago +3 / -0

those comments on the OAN site give me good feels

3
Ed_Ward 3 points ago +3 / -0

If free speech protects burning American flags, then it must protect flying a Confederate flag.

3
Win4Don 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm from the Deep South. Seen the rebel flag my whole life, never owned one, probably never will. The only people you see flying the flag are usually young boys on the back of a truck or boat, or maybe an ol' timer in his yard usually beside the American flag. Never saw it as racist. When I see one I just think of the Old South and no not the racist, Jim Crowe, KKK South, just the old South with antebellum homes, magnolia trees, sweet tea, and down home cooking. When people say heritage, to me that's what they're talking about. Most people fly it for nostalgia or maybe to show they're rebellious side, not for hate. I love Lynyrd Skynyrd and when I watch old concert footage and they drop the rebel flag, I'm like Hell yeah. They were some good ol' boys from the South rocking and raising Hell. If you were offended by a rebel flag then you probably wasn't the kinda of folks that should be at a Skynyrd concert. They were rebels so they flew the rebel flag, that's who they were, not racists, just rebels.

3
masshole3 3 points ago +3 / -0

I never thought my Freedom Boner would get THIS large.

3
Media_Brews_Hate 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course it is, and "Offensive speech" is the only kind that requires absolute protection. There's no reason to declare freedom of in-offensive speech.

3
SJBHamilton 3 points ago +3 / -0

In the movie "Hunt for the Unicorn Killer", Holly Maddux's father hung a Nazi flag in the Maddux family living room. He had fought in World War 2, and felt proud to have been part of the liberation of Europe from Fascism. Ira Einhorn pretended to be butthurt about it (being of Jewish heritage) and told all his friends that Holly's father was a Fascist.

When I see the confederate flag I think about the issues that ripped this country apart and yes, I think about the emancipation of slaves. I would not want its display to be banned.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
UncleTrumpsBand 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeeeeeeeeeee Haw! Dixie is heritage not hate

3
intolerantofstupid 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seems like it shouldn't require an explanation, and yet, these are the time we're all living in.

3
jennyfrutex 3 points ago +3 / -0

"THE CONFEDERATE FLAG IS RAYCISS," screamed the skinny white 19-year-old in black waving the hammer and sickle.

3
Hunterscrackbaby 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol

twatter is going to fucking lose it.

3
Flipbarryfromreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy shit. This man has balls! You love to see it. 4 more years! He tripled down!!!!

2
AGNT-BLANK 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is 100% correct, however it is going to look real bad.