1766
Comments (50)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
60
MarchEast 60 points ago +61 / -1

Katlin is showing us the way to argue with these turds if we must.

Next time I have to deal with having to defend my support of Trump, I'm just gonna call the person a pedophile and insist they prove they aren't.

20
muslimporn 20 points ago +21 / -1

I agree that's one way to do it.

This this is another case where I must explain the liberal language. The liberal in this case made an entirely valid argument.

In the liberal vocabulary white supremacy is when a white person comes out on top. For example, Trump is supreme leader of the nation or at least you can somewhat put it that way (though not in the sense of it they mean in DPRK for example).

In our language if we think of white supremacy then it might be that to support someone being in office because they're white. In the liberal language it means supporting a person that is white being in office.

Very subtle but you see the difference. Although both our languages use most of the same words and terms they mean different things in each language.

17
DrCowboyPresident 17 points ago +17 / -0

In the liberal language it means supporting a person that is white being in office.

Close. It's a white that doesn't hate their own people.

2
muslimporn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's a bit more a white that's not completely compliant to them. The rest comes after that. Biden gets a pass being a willing puppet. Some other special exceptions as well such as presently being female allows bipass of the prohibition on whites.

4
Mr_Pink 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, it means the same in both languages but leftists are retarded.

1
LoneStarDangler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sometimes it's good to be able to speak a bit of retard

3
knightofday 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same for sure