Pretty much. Could be Christianity, or Buddhism, or anything really, even being addicted to health and fitness, but they’ve got a giant gaping hole in their brains that SJW postmodern nonsense fills to give their lives meaning. If they didn’t have that, they would have nothing.
What would define morality if not for some greater power, whether you call it Buddha or God or you believe in karma and reincarnation? Legitimate question here.
Can you justify any act as being wholly moral or wholly immoral without having to look at it outside of the perspective of humanity? You might say that your morals can be deduced through logic, but not everyone has the same reasoning capabilities as you nor do they have the same views on life as you. Without a higher authority or being, who is to say that your set or code of morals is right or whether someone else's might be correct?
I'm not saying you can't be a moral atheist. Especially in today's day and age you certainly can be. But I think it takes an astounding amount of naivety and ignorance to believe that human beings would eventually come across the firmly established moral code we live with now without religions, both ancient and current, driving the philosophy behind those morals.
Your comment is ignorant, like much of your post history. You have commented before supporting censorship, banning contraceptives, and denouncing individualism (ironic from someone who hates Marxists)
Gee, maybe it’s because I’d rather not have degeneracy and subversive content being allowed to RUIN our society (edit: and, might I add, EVERY SINGLE SOCIETY in some form or another has had censorship of subversive or counter cultural ideas. Rome has the censor and in the first years of our republic we had blasphemy laws), we need to increase the native birth rate and make sure, if you try to have sex out of wedlock, you don’t get to have it “risk” free (nevermind the spiritual and mental wounds it causes), and individualism is basically atomization of society and the so called “Right” (basically classical liberals, not true right wingers) allowing it to be picked off one by one. Even if we accept individualism, please not it only works in homogenous societies. Do we look fucking homogenous to you?
I’m interpreting anything literally meaning anything like a hobby or something they are passionate about or even just purpose. They lack all of them and put their whole being into being woke or an sjw so all they have is just that it is their entire identity. You don’t have to be religious to be a good person. I’m catholic but wouldn’t say non religious or people of other religions have to be catholic.
People who have anorexia are deathly skinny but they believe they are a morbidly obese fat person. It's a disconnect between what they believe and what is reality. Same concept with trans people, except the left have found a way to capitalize on them in the form of money from surgeries and meds and yet another method of destroying society.
I don't think they have found a way to capitalize. Rather, these poor losers are being weaponized as part of the reckless politicization of an entire generation of coddled, pudgy neurotic emotionally-incontinent babies. There's a reason that the LinkedIn page for Google's newest Content Moderator doesn't just say Trans, it always says Genderqueer Furry Trans.
It's Marxist social destruction in its purest form. The Communist International members a hundred years ago would instantly recognize every tactic in play here. In point of fact, it IS Communist International members engaging in these tactics; they've simply diffused farther into our society as part of their Long March. The tiny handful of people who actually feel like their bodies have betrayed them in a gender-focused way typically deserve the same sympathy you would have for someone suffering the aforementioned anorexia, and need lots and lots of therapy (since our understanding of the brain is still so incomplete and there are no easy answers). They're usually trauma victims, as well.
Of course, the faddish "This is in style now" SJW-point virtue-signal "trans" weirdos, they deserve no sympathy at all. Beatings, maybe.
because they lack Jesus so everything is acceptable, hence why we get all this tranny garbage now morphing into them trying to normalize pedos.
Pretty much. Could be Christianity, or Buddhism, or anything really, even being addicted to health and fitness, but they’ve got a giant gaping hole in their brains that SJW postmodern nonsense fills to give their lives meaning. If they didn’t have that, they would have nothing.
No. Just Christianity. Only Christ can save the wicked.
Edit: What’s with all the downvotes?
Don't have to be Christian to have logical and consistent morality. Just can't be a leftie.
What would define morality if not for some greater power, whether you call it Buddha or God or you believe in karma and reincarnation? Legitimate question here.
Can you justify any act as being wholly moral or wholly immoral without having to look at it outside of the perspective of humanity? You might say that your morals can be deduced through logic, but not everyone has the same reasoning capabilities as you nor do they have the same views on life as you. Without a higher authority or being, who is to say that your set or code of morals is right or whether someone else's might be correct?
I'm not saying you can't be a moral atheist. Especially in today's day and age you certainly can be. But I think it takes an astounding amount of naivety and ignorance to believe that human beings would eventually come across the firmly established moral code we live with now without religions, both ancient and current, driving the philosophy behind those morals.
I wouldn't worry about it tbh. With so many users there are bound to be people who disagree or are cuck voting.
You are being downvoted because shills are here. That or .win let way too many redditors on here. I always knew it is a mistake.
Your comment is ignorant, like much of your post history. You have commented before supporting censorship, banning contraceptives, and denouncing individualism (ironic from someone who hates Marxists)
Gee, maybe it’s because I’d rather not have degeneracy and subversive content being allowed to RUIN our society (edit: and, might I add, EVERY SINGLE SOCIETY in some form or another has had censorship of subversive or counter cultural ideas. Rome has the censor and in the first years of our republic we had blasphemy laws), we need to increase the native birth rate and make sure, if you try to have sex out of wedlock, you don’t get to have it “risk” free (nevermind the spiritual and mental wounds it causes), and individualism is basically atomization of society and the so called “Right” (basically classical liberals, not true right wingers) allowing it to be picked off one by one. Even if we accept individualism, please not it only works in homogenous societies. Do we look fucking homogenous to you?
"Your comment is ignorant" only libcucks talk like that...
I’m interpreting anything literally meaning anything like a hobby or something they are passionate about or even just purpose. They lack all of them and put their whole being into being woke or an sjw so all they have is just that it is their entire identity. You don’t have to be religious to be a good person. I’m catholic but wouldn’t say non religious or people of other religions have to be catholic.
or Climate doomsday
Deep down they know they have no sense of meaning. That’s why they try to make everyone else around them as miserable as they are
Inside of a boy
Damn! This is why I love freedom of speech. The jokes are way better.
https://imgur.com/yc8tLH6
So...so spicy it's almost attempted murder 😂😅
Goddamnit 😫
People who have anorexia are deathly skinny but they believe they are a morbidly obese fat person. It's a disconnect between what they believe and what is reality. Same concept with trans people, except the left have found a way to capitalize on them in the form of money from surgeries and meds and yet another method of destroying society.
I don't think they have found a way to capitalize. Rather, these poor losers are being weaponized as part of the reckless politicization of an entire generation of coddled, pudgy neurotic emotionally-incontinent babies. There's a reason that the LinkedIn page for Google's newest Content Moderator doesn't just say Trans, it always says Genderqueer Furry Trans.
It's Marxist social destruction in its purest form. The Communist International members a hundred years ago would instantly recognize every tactic in play here. In point of fact, it IS Communist International members engaging in these tactics; they've simply diffused farther into our society as part of their Long March. The tiny handful of people who actually feel like their bodies have betrayed them in a gender-focused way typically deserve the same sympathy you would have for someone suffering the aforementioned anorexia, and need lots and lots of therapy (since our understanding of the brain is still so incomplete and there are no easy answers). They're usually trauma victims, as well.
Of course, the faddish "This is in style now" SJW-point virtue-signal "trans" weirdos, they deserve no sympathy at all. Beatings, maybe.
Wait till we get to the "killing white kids is sorta ok since we have so many" section
Same way pedos and the clergy are connected
both very likely victims of sexual abuse as a child
Not sure I agree with your diagnosis there. Many gays and trans people suffer abuse as children, in particular sexual abuse. Same with pedos.
Sexual abuse as children can fuck your mind up in many different ways, but it often results in confused or warped sexuality as an adult.
https://newspunch.com/cross-dressing-pedophile-female-prison/
https://newspunch.com/judge-allows-convicted-pedophile-leave-prison-after-becomes-transgender-woman/
Not having overriding principles and being ruled by your baser desires leaves you open to suggestion, submissive.
Nothing against having a strong sex drive, but when it defines you - you are weak.