yes, because skin color is a stupid thing to form allegiances on. It's as stupid as forming alliances on hair color or eye color. That being said, unfortunately, because skin color is an obsession in our society (Obama acted stupidly), we have to notice it. That doesn't mean that we have to accept the racial narrative given to us by the Democrat media and academia. Frankly, if someone thinks white have to band together due to the racial polarization, I have just one question for them....how did that work out for the blacks? They've been unified in their support for Democratic candidates since 1964 and despite all this racial solidarity, it got them 70%+ rate of children being born into broken homes, the highest black on black murder rates, poverty, ignorance and violence. Why would you think racial solidarity would work out better for whites?
It believed that something like a constitution could make this work, but reality is proving that to be wrong and that racial grievances over previous power imbalances are a far most powerful motivating force than a piece of paper
That's where you and I disagree. I think that "piece of paper" is a lot stronger than you think.
I remember back in the day, people said a Marriage Certificate was "just a piece of paper". They were wrong then and those who say such things now, are wrong too.
Which brings me back to my first point...do you want to end up like the demographics that treat binding foundations of law and culture "just like a piece of paper"? If you do, then just go ahead and pretend that skin color means more than culture. If you want a stable marriage and to participate in civilization, don't treat stupid things like they have weight and substance and don't treat important frameworks of culture as if they are worth no more than the material they're written upon. You want to live a thuggy, impoverished life full of failure, you just go right ahead and treat the intangible valueable things as if they have no value and treat the insignificant as if it had magical power.
Being white is a skin color. If you're asking about culture, that is Western Civilization. Then the first place to look is Christianity, specifically, the Roman Catholic Church because Civilization is downstream from Religion. Secularly speaking, it means philosophy and science that was started by the ancient Greeks.
These things are open to all mankind, not just Europeans and their descendants. Just like our Declaration of Independence and Constitution apply to every American citizen, Western Civilization can apply to every human being. In fact, Western Civilization can even adapt to every other culture in the world and has done so, as long as its Christian and its philosophy seeks the good+true+beautiful.
You reek of disingenuous subversion. Leave this place if you are just here to argue outside of good faith. Everyone knows being white is more than skin color.
yes, because skin color is a stupid thing to form allegiances on. It's as stupid as forming alliances on hair color or eye color. That being said, unfortunately, because skin color is an obsession in our society (Obama acted stupidly), we have to notice it. That doesn't mean that we have to accept the racial narrative given to us by the Democrat media and academia. Frankly, if someone thinks white have to band together due to the racial polarization, I have just one question for them....how did that work out for the blacks? They've been unified in their support for Democratic candidates since 1964 and despite all this racial solidarity, it got them 70%+ rate of children being born into broken homes, the highest black on black murder rates, poverty, ignorance and violence. Why would you think racial solidarity would work out better for whites?
Would you mistake Candace Owens?
for a dumb grifter? yes
That's where you and I disagree. I think that "piece of paper" is a lot stronger than you think.
I remember back in the day, people said a Marriage Certificate was "just a piece of paper". They were wrong then and those who say such things now, are wrong too.
Which brings me back to my first point...do you want to end up like the demographics that treat binding foundations of law and culture "just like a piece of paper"? If you do, then just go ahead and pretend that skin color means more than culture. If you want a stable marriage and to participate in civilization, don't treat stupid things like they have weight and substance and don't treat important frameworks of culture as if they are worth no more than the material they're written upon. You want to live a thuggy, impoverished life full of failure, you just go right ahead and treat the intangible valueable things as if they have no value and treat the insignificant as if it had magical power.
Being white is a skin color. If you're asking about culture, that is Western Civilization. Then the first place to look is Christianity, specifically, the Roman Catholic Church because Civilization is downstream from Religion. Secularly speaking, it means philosophy and science that was started by the ancient Greeks.
These things are open to all mankind, not just Europeans and their descendants. Just like our Declaration of Independence and Constitution apply to every American citizen, Western Civilization can apply to every human being. In fact, Western Civilization can even adapt to every other culture in the world and has done so, as long as its Christian and its philosophy seeks the good+true+beautiful.
You reek of disingenuous subversion. Leave this place if you are just here to argue outside of good faith. Everyone knows being white is more than skin color.