And yet- they are still selling slaves in Africa, and middle east.
Epstein bought children from around the world, he is not the only one. Epstein was a slave trader, but he dealt in children and young women.
[20 years ago?] on an American Airline, there was a 9 year old girl from India in first class alone crying, because she just was just sold to an Arab as a sex slave. The flight crew were able to save that child-as far as I know.
Well, they tried to keep their slavery in the first one...claimed rights to protect their enslaving mentality. When they lost, they were pissed...promised to rise again.
Not a civil war, but Germany basically started WWII because they were offended by WWI.
Allies enforced war guilt on Germany and demanded reparations, much like how these Cultural Marxists are now enforcing guilt on white people and demanding reparations.
Not a civil war, but Germany basically started WWII because they were offended by WWI.
The Soviet Union had invaded and conquered and committed lots of genocides against ethnic Europeans starting from the early 1920s. They had from very early on, 1919, stated that they intended to conquer Europe through military warfare. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Soviet_War :
As early as late 1919 the leader of Russia's new Bolshevik Government, Vladimir Lenin, inspired by the Red Army's civil-war victories over White Russian anti-Communist forces and their Western allies, began to see the future of the revolution with greater optimism. The Bolsheviks proclaimed the need for the dictatorship of the proletariat, and agitated for a worldwide Communist community. They had an avowed intent to link the revolution in Russia with an expected revolution in Germany and to assist other Communist movements in Western Europe; Poland was the geographical bridge that the Red Army would have to cross to provide direct physical support in the West.[20][dead link][25][26][27]
And Germany had trouble re-arming due to the restrictions of the treaties it was under, making it more difficult for it to defend itself. With the Soviet Union conquering more and more of Europe, and committed lots of genocides throughout their whole existence including on the conquered countries and territories, Germans were 100% justified in fearing the Soviet Union.
So... "[...] Germany basically started WWII because they were offended by WWI." is an incredibly weird thing to claim when the Soviet Union were conquering more and more and more of Europe and committing lots of genocides throughout that time.
One of the most conflicting accounts I read in Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago was a Russian general who went rogue due to opposing the rise of the Communists in the Soviet Union. He made an alliance with the Nazis, hoping the German government would help him fight a counter revolution against the Soviets.
I'm Jewish myself, so naturally I recoil from anyone who allies with the Nazis. Yet I couldn't help but appreciate the pickle these Russian generals were in, trying to find allies against the Soviets. (After reading hundreds of other pages of Solzhenitsyn's testimony)
And ultimately they were betrayed by Churchill and the allies at the conclusion of the war, who promised protection but handed them over to Stalin.
The population pushing this is so small in comparison. They have the media on their side and are twisting the arms of corporate giants, but they are small.
The war would be over as soon as it started. When white people who are "allies" realize what this kind of garbage means to them PERSONALLY, you'd see it dry up.
Right now it's all theoretical and word salads flying back and forth on social media, but situations like these where city employees are being sat down and told this means literally THEY WILL GET LESS THAN THEY DESERVE are crucial.
Remember the video where the guy walked around college campus putting socialism in the lens of their GPA and they all objected strenuously: "BUT I WORKED FOR THAT GPA!!!1"
Well put. I believe it's a sliver of the American people pushing this shit. MSM are just putting a giant magnifying glass on a drop of water and trying to sell us a pool.
ive long stood by the idea that social media is a problem of illegal trust/monopoly and needs to be abolished.
The reason is, centralized services used by everyone who act not as public squares with reasonable privacy expectations and little/no moderation outside of law enforcement, replaced many such third party services and apps which performed the same services arguably better -- just in a less profitable way.
think about discord for example, vs IRC. its basically an updated IRC for all intents and purposes but runs on a for-profit model controlled by a single company. IRC on the otherhand, couldve easily been updated open source -- and anyone with an ISP that allows it or business class internet can just run their own server freely.
i can still setup a new IRC server right now, for free (outside of hardware computer cost and ISP service/bandwidth) I could even rent a virtual server and do it. but i cant host a discord.
i cant connect to facebook's chat without its permission -- and even if i did they still profit and i lose control of the data transfer (although if possible to get an API you could make something that sends gpg encrypted text to facebook so they cant break it and then just translate on the fly but average users arent gonna deal with keys even if i wrote automated software for that)
either way, its displaced several other existing services largely to the detriment of the internet. it takes ideas that truly were once considered free about the internet away in order to make a profitable business model out of it by controlling access to server software and then herding most average users into using their software.
once that happens, you have a MS windows-like effect. everyone else is using it so in many cases, even if you dont want to and happily use other things and like them far more, you get forced into using it too. supporting the business you hate just because you need its services which have no alternative.
you cant get several chat program accounts from people anymore. no, its facebook, discord, the centrally owned services.
I lament the internet today and wish for the old internet of my youth back. where everyone was an 'edge lord' and we were all nerds, and you normies didnt know how to flip a switch on an electronic box. when things were the wild west, with no law enforcement OR social enforcement, everything chaotic and free.
sure it had problems -- some of which still endure to this day.
but reddit, facebook, discord, eating away at all services and essentially creating monopoly replacements for what can EASILY be free and open source software? ridic.
I could program you that as a free project. pro bono. just take IRC, update it to handle voice streams and graphics in a modernized application. boom. done. you could easily use the ageing backend of IRC and itd still be solid as a rock -- or you could create a new one if you really wanted.
not only that but several companies could compete if there was any value in it.
big problem with tech industry today is them wanting to profit from things which arent worth money. basically ANY user SAAS outside of literal business contracts for like high end hardware is garbage and anti-consumer. charging for variables stored in the computer you already own. trying to turn software into a 'pay-as-you-run' rather than 'pay-then-you-own'.
I hate to be a dick about it, and i am sour grapes on this subject. but 99% of modern tech business practices need to be straight up made illegal and highly punishable offenses. some of which include enticing minors to gamble though legal loopholes (a five year old can infinitely gamble for non-existant objects -- which is actually WORSE than gambling for money!!!!!!! I could literally offer a child a service, as a game, where he gets to see a picture 4% of the time for $5 and thats legal, but if he gets 5 cents, it becomes a crime!!!!!
this shit has destroyed video games, online culture, and literally helped to establish some kind of technocratic control system. its evil now. sure from the perspective of investors, its great! making money off things that you previously had to just give away. but its really not great at large -- and only enables a few virtual monopolies to make money without any form of competition or regulations to protect users.
You can buy a game and in a week it can be taken offline with no refund. there is no protection, no guarantee to the consumer at all. the only guarantee is you will be milked dry, your info will be stolen and used for profit, and that you'll probably keep paying them forever but things will never improve -- the more you pay, the more effort they put into doubling down.
and since they are monopolies they always double down. so really its tripling down. they never concede. this has been happening since the 70s when the unix code was pulled from universities and its gotten insane, and i didnt even get into the legitamate patent issues which actually make GNU not communism at all.
the big driving force behind copyleft isnt leftism directly even though stallman is himself an insane leftist who eats his toenails and says deranged things. the actual political motivation is the fact that, basically math equations and things that arent even copyable -- like the idea of a type of photo sorting for example -- are being copyrighted every day. and not only that, old, ancient 100 year old things are kept alive by people called 'patent trolls' who do not work at all, but instead buy up old IP just to file frivolous lawsuits knowing they can win 4/10 for profit.
suing people over things created decades or even 100 years ago is their entire business. So as a software developer your always walking on nails that you'll get sued over literally lies and slander. you can come up with something individually off the top of your head using entirely original algorithms and still get sued. because you sorted images a certain way in your application over networking. because you PERFORMED A FUCKING GENERIC FUNCTION ANYONE COULD INDEPENDENTLY COME UP WITH EASILY WHO KNOWS HOW.
so yes, tech needs to be brought down 10 pegs. the boom has to end and start going bust where investors get the hell out for dear life as the market crashes and refreshes. it needs to be started by implementing both revisions limiting patent ownership of algorithmic ideas to less years with finite renewals, and economic regulations preventing most profitable business tactics invented since the development of high speed internet and more prominently cell phones.
what i refer to is -- data collection practices, microtransaction regulations, guarantees to the user that your service, if being sold as a service, will be online for at least X months after purchase or a full refund issued. in many cases, if server software can easily be provided without infringing on corporate secrets, it should be to enable users of software to use the software past its use-by date if possible, and other restrictions.
this would immediately strangle the market and most of the newer investors would literally run for their lives to other industries. you might find a lot of the older developers who still have money but quit 20 years ago come and buy back their old companies and restore them to greatness with fresh new IPs, renewals of old classics, and more that the current tech industry refuses to provide users because "not enough profit margin anymore child gambling is legal now lol we are in the slot machine biz"
You have to have hope that at some point, hopefully soon, liberal leaning white suburbanites (thinking of your stereotypical shrill wife, neutered husband professional combo) will realize this is heading towards a zero-sum economy, with the spoils delivered on racial lines; one in which their own children are at increasing risk of losing out on opportunities due to the color of their skin. These people seem utterly addicted to the moral superiority that comes with sharing liberal, "anti-racist" ideas, but you would hope they can put their children's well being before that.
They won’t. Look at Mollie Tibbetts’ parents. Daughter was killed by an illegal alien and they spent their press conference talking about diversity and tacos.
Get ready for the "white people tax" if Dems get control. It be some sort of reparations bill that will simply transfer wealth from the middle class to leftist elites and globalists which they will use to destroy us. They would love nothing more than another tax to put the final nail in the coffin for the middle class, then they will finally have their dream of only elites and peasants.
Already happening here in Illinois basically. Profits from the new weed sales (that are taxed beyond belief) go directly to poor black communities they claim.
No its not exactly the same thing but this is how its beginning, next they'll start using money from other things for reparations if they dont just straight up get 'reparation money'.
I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I'm fucking retarded but I don't care, I'm beautiful. I'm having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me "Apache" and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can't accept me you're a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding.
They are trying to force civil war 2
Imagine a country starting a second civil war because they were offended by the first.
Well they're still pissed about the outcome of the first one.
Crazy that they’re actually outraged at the emancipation of slaves
Their slaves.
So addicted to power, they got the 13th amendment written to continue to allow slavery. Just state owners vs private.
Would have made Marx gush - the left nationalized slavery.
And yet- they are still selling slaves in Africa, and middle east.
Epstein bought children from around the world, he is not the only one. Epstein was a slave trader, but he dealt in children and young women.
[20 years ago?] on an American Airline, there was a 9 year old girl from India in first class alone crying, because she just was just sold to an Arab as a sex slave. The flight crew were able to save that child-as far as I know.
These Dems aren’t the Dems of the 1860s. 1860s Dems were in favor of state’s rights, property rights, and cruelty stood by the american worker.
What are they gonna do after losing the second one? Get triggered and start a third one to lose?
Well, they tried to keep their slavery in the first one...claimed rights to protect their enslaving mentality. When they lost, they were pissed...promised to rise again.
Well, they have.
Your username is awesome
Not a civil war, but Germany basically started WWII because they were offended by WWI.
Allies enforced war guilt on Germany and demanded reparations, much like how these Cultural Marxists are now enforcing guilt on white people and demanding reparations.
The Soviet Union had invaded and conquered and committed lots of genocides against ethnic Europeans starting from the early 1920s. They had from very early on, 1919, stated that they intended to conquer Europe through military warfare. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Soviet_War :
And Germany had trouble re-arming due to the restrictions of the treaties it was under, making it more difficult for it to defend itself. With the Soviet Union conquering more and more of Europe, and committed lots of genocides throughout their whole existence including on the conquered countries and territories, Germans were 100% justified in fearing the Soviet Union.
So... "[...] Germany basically started WWII because they were offended by WWI." is an incredibly weird thing to claim when the Soviet Union were conquering more and more and more of Europe and committing lots of genocides throughout that time.
Thanks for giving this info to people. Way too many people just know the shibboleths taught in schools and not the whole truth.
Nevermind that the Soviets invaded Poland along with Germany, but the Soviets got GIVEN Poland at the end of the war. Whose side were we on?
One of the most conflicting accounts I read in Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago was a Russian general who went rogue due to opposing the rise of the Communists in the Soviet Union. He made an alliance with the Nazis, hoping the German government would help him fight a counter revolution against the Soviets.
I'm Jewish myself, so naturally I recoil from anyone who allies with the Nazis. Yet I couldn't help but appreciate the pickle these Russian generals were in, trying to find allies against the Soviets. (After reading hundreds of other pages of Solzhenitsyn's testimony)
And ultimately they were betrayed by Churchill and the allies at the conclusion of the war, who promised protection but handed them over to Stalin.
Bolshevism
stale and gay take. study history or shush
😂😂 Nailed it
Only in Communism.
The population pushing this is so small in comparison. They have the media on their side and are twisting the arms of corporate giants, but they are small.
The war would be over as soon as it started. When white people who are "allies" realize what this kind of garbage means to them PERSONALLY, you'd see it dry up.
Right now it's all theoretical and word salads flying back and forth on social media, but situations like these where city employees are being sat down and told this means literally THEY WILL GET LESS THAN THEY DESERVE are crucial.
Remember the video where the guy walked around college campus putting socialism in the lens of their GPA and they all objected strenuously: "BUT I WORKED FOR THAT GPA!!!1"
You think those white Antifa fags can be reasoned with? They're too far gone.
What makes you think their aren’t Latino or Black pedes. You statement is repugnant.
It won't come to that. Even most Democrats will see how the idea of making white people a lesser race is perfectly twisted in knots
bro are you paying attention at all? it already has come to that
This should be stickied. Done! Took about 3 minutes
Well put. I believe it's a sliver of the American people pushing this shit. MSM are just putting a giant magnifying glass on a drop of water and trying to sell us a pool.
“American” people
Infiltrators
More like “hello fellow white people” amirite
I agree. I am beginning to ponder my life without internet because it's the only place I see this insanity.
I'd gladly give up internet if it meant everybody worldwide had to
ive long stood by the idea that social media is a problem of illegal trust/monopoly and needs to be abolished.
The reason is, centralized services used by everyone who act not as public squares with reasonable privacy expectations and little/no moderation outside of law enforcement, replaced many such third party services and apps which performed the same services arguably better -- just in a less profitable way.
think about discord for example, vs IRC. its basically an updated IRC for all intents and purposes but runs on a for-profit model controlled by a single company. IRC on the otherhand, couldve easily been updated open source -- and anyone with an ISP that allows it or business class internet can just run their own server freely.
i can still setup a new IRC server right now, for free (outside of hardware computer cost and ISP service/bandwidth) I could even rent a virtual server and do it. but i cant host a discord.
i cant connect to facebook's chat without its permission -- and even if i did they still profit and i lose control of the data transfer (although if possible to get an API you could make something that sends gpg encrypted text to facebook so they cant break it and then just translate on the fly but average users arent gonna deal with keys even if i wrote automated software for that)
either way, its displaced several other existing services largely to the detriment of the internet. it takes ideas that truly were once considered free about the internet away in order to make a profitable business model out of it by controlling access to server software and then herding most average users into using their software.
once that happens, you have a MS windows-like effect. everyone else is using it so in many cases, even if you dont want to and happily use other things and like them far more, you get forced into using it too. supporting the business you hate just because you need its services which have no alternative.
you cant get several chat program accounts from people anymore. no, its facebook, discord, the centrally owned services.
I lament the internet today and wish for the old internet of my youth back. where everyone was an 'edge lord' and we were all nerds, and you normies didnt know how to flip a switch on an electronic box. when things were the wild west, with no law enforcement OR social enforcement, everything chaotic and free.
sure it had problems -- some of which still endure to this day.
but reddit, facebook, discord, eating away at all services and essentially creating monopoly replacements for what can EASILY be free and open source software? ridic.
I could program you that as a free project. pro bono. just take IRC, update it to handle voice streams and graphics in a modernized application. boom. done. you could easily use the ageing backend of IRC and itd still be solid as a rock -- or you could create a new one if you really wanted.
not only that but several companies could compete if there was any value in it.
big problem with tech industry today is them wanting to profit from things which arent worth money. basically ANY user SAAS outside of literal business contracts for like high end hardware is garbage and anti-consumer. charging for variables stored in the computer you already own. trying to turn software into a 'pay-as-you-run' rather than 'pay-then-you-own'.
I hate to be a dick about it, and i am sour grapes on this subject. but 99% of modern tech business practices need to be straight up made illegal and highly punishable offenses. some of which include enticing minors to gamble though legal loopholes (a five year old can infinitely gamble for non-existant objects -- which is actually WORSE than gambling for money!!!!!!! I could literally offer a child a service, as a game, where he gets to see a picture 4% of the time for $5 and thats legal, but if he gets 5 cents, it becomes a crime!!!!!
this shit has destroyed video games, online culture, and literally helped to establish some kind of technocratic control system. its evil now. sure from the perspective of investors, its great! making money off things that you previously had to just give away. but its really not great at large -- and only enables a few virtual monopolies to make money without any form of competition or regulations to protect users.
You can buy a game and in a week it can be taken offline with no refund. there is no protection, no guarantee to the consumer at all. the only guarantee is you will be milked dry, your info will be stolen and used for profit, and that you'll probably keep paying them forever but things will never improve -- the more you pay, the more effort they put into doubling down.
and since they are monopolies they always double down. so really its tripling down. they never concede. this has been happening since the 70s when the unix code was pulled from universities and its gotten insane, and i didnt even get into the legitamate patent issues which actually make GNU not communism at all.
the big driving force behind copyleft isnt leftism directly even though stallman is himself an insane leftist who eats his toenails and says deranged things. the actual political motivation is the fact that, basically math equations and things that arent even copyable -- like the idea of a type of photo sorting for example -- are being copyrighted every day. and not only that, old, ancient 100 year old things are kept alive by people called 'patent trolls' who do not work at all, but instead buy up old IP just to file frivolous lawsuits knowing they can win 4/10 for profit.
suing people over things created decades or even 100 years ago is their entire business. So as a software developer your always walking on nails that you'll get sued over literally lies and slander. you can come up with something individually off the top of your head using entirely original algorithms and still get sued. because you sorted images a certain way in your application over networking. because you PERFORMED A FUCKING GENERIC FUNCTION ANYONE COULD INDEPENDENTLY COME UP WITH EASILY WHO KNOWS HOW.
so yes, tech needs to be brought down 10 pegs. the boom has to end and start going bust where investors get the hell out for dear life as the market crashes and refreshes. it needs to be started by implementing both revisions limiting patent ownership of algorithmic ideas to less years with finite renewals, and economic regulations preventing most profitable business tactics invented since the development of high speed internet and more prominently cell phones.
what i refer to is -- data collection practices, microtransaction regulations, guarantees to the user that your service, if being sold as a service, will be online for at least X months after purchase or a full refund issued. in many cases, if server software can easily be provided without infringing on corporate secrets, it should be to enable users of software to use the software past its use-by date if possible, and other restrictions.
this would immediately strangle the market and most of the newer investors would literally run for their lives to other industries. you might find a lot of the older developers who still have money but quit 20 years ago come and buy back their old companies and restore them to greatness with fresh new IPs, renewals of old classics, and more that the current tech industry refuses to provide users because "not enough profit margin anymore child gambling is legal now lol we are in the slot machine biz"
But it has to be a shooting war for that to occur. And I don't think conservatives have it in us. Particularly with no leadership.
Remember that about 40,000 Bolsheviks took over a country with a population of 150,000,000 merely because they were motivated. These people are too.
You have to have hope that at some point, hopefully soon, liberal leaning white suburbanites (thinking of your stereotypical shrill wife, neutered husband professional combo) will realize this is heading towards a zero-sum economy, with the spoils delivered on racial lines; one in which their own children are at increasing risk of losing out on opportunities due to the color of their skin. These people seem utterly addicted to the moral superiority that comes with sharing liberal, "anti-racist" ideas, but you would hope they can put their children's well being before that.
They won’t. Look at Mollie Tibbetts’ parents. Daughter was killed by an illegal alien and they spent their press conference talking about diversity and tacos.
The left have always been the racists and they still are. They see a person's race. We see a person's actions and his political philosophy
There were no dark skinned people in Russia
They gon' get it.
Fuck around and find out.
Get ready for the "white people tax" if Dems get control. It be some sort of reparations bill that will simply transfer wealth from the middle class to leftist elites and globalists which they will use to destroy us. They would love nothing more than another tax to put the final nail in the coffin for the middle class, then they will finally have their dream of only elites and peasants.
Already happening here in Illinois basically. Profits from the new weed sales (that are taxed beyond belief) go directly to poor black communities they claim.
No its not exactly the same thing but this is how its beginning, next they'll start using money from other things for reparations if they dont just straight up get 'reparation money'.
https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2019/11/27/evanston-recreational-cannabis-reparations-african-american-residents/
Everybody should just declare they identify as black and be done with it!😀
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-sexually-identify-as-an-attack-helicopter