Allow me to rephrase that. Technically it could happen, but it wouldn't mean anything or accomplish anything beyond a stalling tactic. What I'm really saying is that I can't imagine a scenario where this makes any difference whatsoever beyond dragging this out for a few more months.
I've said that since the first stalling tactic he's tried. If the DOJ declines to further prosecute the case and dismisses charges (with prejudice I believe is the term), Sullivan can't sentence him just because he still wants to. I don't know of any precedence for this kind of ruling. There's such a thing as jury nullification but I've never heard of prosecutorial re-assertion by a judge or actually in this case by an amicus attorney. I don't think that's a thing.
They want a review of this case to drag it out and perhaps find some kernel of dirt on somebody that they can turn into a media blitz. That's all this is. Flynn's not back in hot water nor is he going to jail.
Allow me to rephrase that. Technically it could happen, but it wouldn't mean anything or accomplish anything beyond a stalling tactic. What I'm really saying is that I can't imagine a scenario where this makes any difference whatsoever beyond dragging this out for a few more months.
I've said that since the first stalling tactic he's tried. If the DOJ declines to further prosecute the case and dismisses charges (with prejudice I believe is the term), Sullivan can't sentence him just because he still wants to. I don't know of any precedence for this kind of ruling. There's such a thing as jury nullification but I've never heard of prosecutorial re-assertion by a judge or actually in this case by an amicus attorney. I don't think that's a thing.
They want a review of this case to drag it out and perhaps find some kernel of dirt on somebody that they can turn into a media blitz. That's all this is. Flynn's not back in hot water nor is he going to jail.