83
Comments (23)
sorted by:
13
Womp_womp 13 points ago +13 / -0

why is it the left can protest to get people arrested, but the right cannot get someone arrested who is clearly guilty?

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
Oathkeepr 9 points ago +9 / -0

when and where?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
Oathkeepr 5 points ago +5 / -0

You definitely are not the only one

Your time to shine will come.

I predict Nov 10th, but the left could continue to act prematurely if they cant gain control the narrative

Stay vigilant

4
MsQleo [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

They wont even have called the election ln the 10th from all the mail in counting

1
NormaJeanRocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trying to imagine the month of November now, its going to be a fucking nightmare mess, anyway you look at it.

2
KeepTheFaith 2 points ago +2 / -0

What are you protesting?

1
NormaJeanRocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

ACTION/JUSTICE/ARRESTS!

1
KeepTheFaith 1 point ago +1 / -0

with what evidence?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
KeepTheFaith 1 point ago +1 / -0

Protesting Durham delaying the investigation until after the election would be a pretty good protest.

OK, do you know the facts? Or are you just throwing ans tantrum? This is a guy who took down the CIA and the MOB. I trust him over you.

6
RlzJohnnyM 6 points ago +6 / -0

What the fuck are you posting?

3
9moreyears 3 points ago +3 / -0

2012 guidelines

1
MsQleo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

That are still in place. This is the same reason Lynch and Clmey used to say they didnt want to discuss the clinton “matter” during an election year, its against policy to charge someone where it will appear partisan. Sessions also used the same excuse

6
UndercoverSpez 6 points ago +6 / -0

Barr said that Durham waant looking into anyone running for election so this shouldnt be an issue. He did say that awhile ago though.

3
MsQleo [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the same reason Lynch and Clmey used to say they didnt want to discuss the clinton “matter” during an election year, its against policy to charge someone where it will appear partisan.

6
Trumper007 6 points ago +6 / -0

LOL what the fuck does that memo have to do with this. That is why Barr said Biden wasn't currently under investigation.

3
MsQleo [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

But they should be, but they hind behind this “policy”

2
aNationOfConquerors 2 points ago +3 / -1

Maybe this is why Barr said no to Obama and Biden during that interview.

Ideally he meant not now, but didn't want to comment on an ongoing case, but I doubt it.

2
Schiffblower 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have no hope but when asked almost that exact question, Barr did reply, “neither of the candidates are under investigation”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
thelastlast 1 point ago +1 / -0

PLEASE stop waiting.

although..I guess that means it begins. sigh. well fuck it, interesting times at least.