Early on, Reddit was censoring his name and we had to spell it like $€th or something related to seem unrelated. There is a Mandela effect also! It was always : His name IS Seth Rich meaning he will always be with us, but since his popularity The phrase changed to: His name Was Seth Rich.
People don't realise that psyops are multi-layered. You shift the theory or belief to one that still seems to be for them and against you and then still oppose that which can actually help it stick.
What people might not consider is this:
There are many people who might have had stuff to leak from what is the most corrupt party in the USA.
Seth didn't leak the emails, someone else got them out.
Seth however had access to some other data.
The NSA caught Seth talking to wikileaks. Though they may not have had the content of the transmissions only the knowledge of the two being in contact.
They informally unmasked him and tipped off the dem campaign about the potential mole.
At this point it's not clear what the dems planned. To make an example of him, stop him in his tracks or to setup what would look like a standard robbery to get his laptop to run their own forensics which may have gone wrong (Seth got one in a headlock, the other then shot Seth in the back to release his accomplice), etc.
I strongly suspect that there's the potential for there to be a whole lot more to Seth Rich plus the deep state than meets the eye. Most likely anyone in the dem campaign in communication with wikileaks was unmasked and shared with the dems / dem campaign.
Think about for example with Flynn...
You've not just got the DNC email leaker there but any potential leaker. DNC would have been spying on its own campaign first and for most to root out moles.
Seth Rich and the DNC emails may be small potatoes and if it wasn't that but something else we may be missing something much bigger.
Democrats are turning America into Russia at the rate they kill and jail political opponents.
Glad to see someone mention psyops. That’s a word that’s not in the ordinary American’s mind even though it directly affects their perspective & beliefs about certain things. It’s crazy. Everyone knows Epstein didn’t kill himself. But we don’t call that “lie” a psyop. When you use the word psyop, people are generally conditioned to condescendingly snicker and ask where your tinfoil hat is. But the irony of it is, they react that way specifically because of the psyops you tried telling them about it. Amazing how blind people can be sometimes.
I think people who snarl at the term psyops are complete and utter retards. If you've ever just worked in marketing or journalism even briefly or in a small part of the services industry so much comes down to basically doing psyops.
Even living our lives we're bombarded by it blatantly from marketing. We all know every ad is trying to get us to do something. It's also trying to impact us psychologically to achieve that.
If it's in the private sector and everywhere all around us then why not the public sector? If it's operating out in the open then why not behind closed doors?
I call it criminalising the opposition. Just banning them, making opposition illegal. Outlawing it. Etc.
Psyops are indeed multi-layered. For example, the NSA has not shown itself to be on the side of the corruption that has ensnared the CIA and FBI.
When Snowden did his “the NSA is bad” project, got tons of publicity, and survived in a way that makes Julian Assange envious, it became clear he was CIA infiltrating the NSA.
It was the head of the NSA that alerted President Trump to the White House being wired to the gills, whereupon GEOTUS went to Mar a Lago until the refurbish was complete.
We are in a war between the NSA/DIA and the CIA/FBI for the fate of the future of the world.
It's possible the NSA might not be the right agency in this case. Though it's supposed to be I assume as it's meant to be more able to do domestic? FBI is domestic but not meant to have those broad spying powers. If it's internal and not the NSA (though maybe sourced through even if innocent)...
Early on, Reddit was censoring his name and we had to spell it like $€th or something related to seem unrelated. There is a Mandela effect also! It was always : His name IS Seth Rich meaning he will always be with us, but since his popularity The phrase changed to: His name Was Seth Rich.
People don't realise that psyops are multi-layered. You shift the theory or belief to one that still seems to be for them and against you and then still oppose that which can actually help it stick.
What people might not consider is this:
I strongly suspect that there's the potential for there to be a whole lot more to Seth Rich plus the deep state than meets the eye. Most likely anyone in the dem campaign in communication with wikileaks was unmasked and shared with the dems / dem campaign.
Think about for example with Flynn...
You've not just got the DNC email leaker there but any potential leaker. DNC would have been spying on its own campaign first and for most to root out moles.
Seth Rich and the DNC emails may be small potatoes and if it wasn't that but something else we may be missing something much bigger.
^ ^ this is quality ^ ^
Democrats are turning America into Russia at the rate they kill and jail political opponents.
Glad to see someone mention psyops. That’s a word that’s not in the ordinary American’s mind even though it directly affects their perspective & beliefs about certain things. It’s crazy. Everyone knows Epstein didn’t kill himself. But we don’t call that “lie” a psyop. When you use the word psyop, people are generally conditioned to condescendingly snicker and ask where your tinfoil hat is. But the irony of it is, they react that way specifically because of the psyops you tried telling them about it. Amazing how blind people can be sometimes.
I think people who snarl at the term psyops are complete and utter retards. If you've ever just worked in marketing or journalism even briefly or in a small part of the services industry so much comes down to basically doing psyops.
Even living our lives we're bombarded by it blatantly from marketing. We all know every ad is trying to get us to do something. It's also trying to impact us psychologically to achieve that.
If it's in the private sector and everywhere all around us then why not the public sector? If it's operating out in the open then why not behind closed doors?
I call it criminalising the opposition. Just banning them, making opposition illegal. Outlawing it. Etc.
Psyops are indeed multi-layered. For example, the NSA has not shown itself to be on the side of the corruption that has ensnared the CIA and FBI.
When Snowden did his “the NSA is bad” project, got tons of publicity, and survived in a way that makes Julian Assange envious, it became clear he was CIA infiltrating the NSA.
It was the head of the NSA that alerted President Trump to the White House being wired to the gills, whereupon GEOTUS went to Mar a Lago until the refurbish was complete.
We are in a war between the NSA/DIA and the CIA/FBI for the fate of the future of the world.
It's possible the NSA might not be the right agency in this case. Though it's supposed to be I assume as it's meant to be more able to do domestic? FBI is domestic but not meant to have those broad spying powers. If it's internal and not the NSA (though maybe sourced through even if innocent)...