4171
Comments (412)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
42
bangbus 42 points ago +42 / -0

Has anyone threatened to sue? That seems like a breach of their terms and certainly doesn’t sound like it comports with the numerous representations they make when advertising the service.

27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
17
bangbus 17 points ago +17 / -0

Day of the service costs like 35 cents. Sue on behalf a class of the 60 million subscribers. That’s close to $20 million. Take 40% in fees. $8 million. I could tolerate the hate for $8 million.

10
BigFreedomBoner 10 points ago +10 / -0

No - it doesn't work like that. The subscription isn't for a day. It is for a month. Damages are $15.99 per subscriber.

So that's $959,400,000 in damages

When a class is certified, then you can start stacking attorneys fees on top of that.

Oh yeah and wouldn't you know it, the attorneys fees are like $600-1000 an hour. And it is hard work finding all those 60 MM subscribers.

Could be wrong on some details - maybe there is a better class action expert than me on this DOM.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Class action or not, if the service functioned normally the whole month except for one day, why would they owe anyone more than the 1 day cost of service? (35 cents)

Lots of other class action questions come up re: lawyers, plannedemic, and plannedriots.

1
bangbus 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could only sue for the day it didn’t work, not the month. I had assumed it was $10 a month. You don’t get a separate hourly fee on antitrust plaintiffs cases, you just get a cut of the settlement or verdict.

14
BigDaddyMAGA 14 points ago +14 / -0

That's fucking amazing. You couldn't even search for other music? Glad I don't use that shit.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0