4753
Biden on the 2nd amendment (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Specter ago by Specter +4753 / -0
Comments (582)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
24
spezisacuckold 24 points ago +26 / -2

I mean, objectively... seeing how many states have actually been not just talking about gun control but have in fact been ENACTING gun control (Virginia, COVID-19 excuses etc)... It's not exactly 'set back decades'. It's been advanced.

Couple that with Trump's unfortunately wishy-washy stance on the 2A ---> like how he unconstitutionally banned bump stocks.

Maybe more people are anti-gun control now, but gun control has still seen politicians ACT on it, while no 2A rights have been ACTED on and restored. Hell, even the Supreme Court punted a bunch of 2A cases back to the lower courts, effectively enforcing more gun control.

15
Jerker1015 15 points ago +15 / -0

The Scotus punting is a blessing. We would have of lost with that turncoat 5-4 and they knew it. We need another Scotus pick or 2 in Trump's second term. Then rule on all the gun stuff

3
BaldEagles 3 points ago +3 / -0

The fact that there has to be a strategy such as this for the highest court to make a ruling is pretty sad.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
Deaduponaviral 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tack on import bans. It’s all garbage. I want my com block aks, I want my veprs gd it.

3
EtTuRINO 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a shame that the NRA is often as loud about gun rights as the ACLU is about freedom of speech nowadays.

3
krzyzowiec 3 points ago +3 / -0

Noise suppressors are a health issue. No one should risk their hearing just to shoot.

2
EtTuRINO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Problem is people totally buy into the idea that it makes it near silent, as seen in movies.

Gun laws are made mostly by the uninformed or those with bad intentions.

Think it was California that banned barrel shrouds a few years ago. And if you ever hear any of these legislators talk about the bills they supposedly wrote or sponsored it's so laughable.

2
christianknight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those red flag laws are like a sniper pointed at each gun owners head 24/7.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 5 points ago +5 / -0

We can take heart knowing that self-defense is a Natural Right as ordained by Nature's God, and that those who choose to defy it, are fighting a war they will always lose.

6
WinstonSmith1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

"...and that those who choose to defy it, are fighting a war they will always lose."

Eventually, maybe, but there are around 100 million dead from the 20th century that might question the assertion.

2
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 2 points ago +3 / -1

Chalk up one more win.

If energy can never be destroyed, do you think we're going to go somewhere else when we die? heh

3
WinstonSmith1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Love your user name; it triggers all the right people:)

2
EtTuRINO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not only 100 million dead but many more still allowing or pushing such practices to go on, plus the Chinese regime has yet to fall.

0
Meddlesom 0 points ago +2 / -2

Bump stocks aren't protected by the constitution though... it's an accessory, banning them doesn't infringe on our rights to own firearms.

2
christianknight 2 points ago +2 / -0

SHALL

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Show me in the constitution where it says we have the right to own bump stocks? Explain how banning bump stocks infringes on our right to bear arms. Don't fucking meme your way out of it.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

The state already banned full autos using the same language. You sound lile a liberal.