It wouldn’t be a “roll of the dice”. No gamble at all. You do realize if there was a civil war 2.0 it would be over quicker than Grenada? We’d walk over them dems
The United Nations have a pretty bad hardon for Trump right now. The libtards are so fucked in the head they might import Iraqi's, Afghanistani's, Somali's, Libyan, South African or any other crackpot soldiers of fortune the left could find. They obviously have absolutely no respect for the country so they'd be just as content to burn it to the ground rather than give up the fight. The undercover Veritas videos should give you a taste of how insane these assholes really are.
The United Nations is a completely garbage and useless organization. Go see the nations on their human rights board and have yourself a good laugh at the irony.
Yea, and despite what a lot think, it's not like we don't have allies. They have their problems too, all countries do. But there is zero chance 90% of our allies wouldn't jump in and help us. At the very least, help protect our borders and seas while we duke it out. Our own military would likely be active in doing just that while civil problems occur. It's likely not gonna be a singular event anyway, but a series of regional events set over several weeks or months.
I'm not so sure our allies would jump in -- Maybe some of the better nations. But the UK? Germany? Hell, most of NATO? Definitely not. Not on our side, anyway.
We need only to look at Syria to see what side our allies would take.
There's a 0% chance any ally would help out in a civil war vs China situation. Remember - "civil war" will easily be their excuse to not do anything + the whole "well, 1 side is every -ist word in existence!" But China wouldn't bother getting involved in a civil war anyways. Directly I mean. No need. They'll continue doing what they've been doing for 20 years now which is continuing to grab a hold of Africa, Asia, and Europe.
The world is currently held at peace by a philosophy of mutually assured destruction. Every nuclear state is afraid to attack another nuclear state because of the retaliatory strike. If the U.S., and therefore her nuclear capabilities, is compromised or otherwise significantly weakened, I have little doubt we would be attacked by opportunistic nations looking to take advantage of the situation.
It's not the cucks giving orders that would participate. It's the real human soldiers who would. I'd be surprised to see any less than 75% or orders to suppress or fire on American citizens be ignored or disobeyed outright.
It wouldn’t be a “roll of the dice”. No gamble at all. You do realize if there was a civil war 2.0 it would be over quicker than Grenada? We’d walk over them dems
Our country would be attacked by other countries.
It's misguided, naive and unrealistic to think that it would just be a left vs right civil war.
Would we win? Most likely. But at significant cost; our country would be desolated in a lot of places for sure.
The left has no problem asking foreign powers for help to quell people they disagree with.
The United Nations have a pretty bad hardon for Trump right now. The libtards are so fucked in the head they might import Iraqi's, Afghanistani's, Somali's, Libyan, South African or any other crackpot soldiers of fortune the left could find. They obviously have absolutely no respect for the country so they'd be just as content to burn it to the ground rather than give up the fight. The undercover Veritas videos should give you a taste of how insane these assholes really are.
The United Nations is a completely garbage and useless organization. Go see the nations on their human rights board and have yourself a good laugh at the irony.
Yea, and despite what a lot think, it's not like we don't have allies. They have their problems too, all countries do. But there is zero chance 90% of our allies wouldn't jump in and help us. At the very least, help protect our borders and seas while we duke it out. Our own military would likely be active in doing just that while civil problems occur. It's likely not gonna be a singular event anyway, but a series of regional events set over several weeks or months.
I'm not so sure our allies would jump in -- Maybe some of the better nations. But the UK? Germany? Hell, most of NATO? Definitely not. Not on our side, anyway.
We need only to look at Syria to see what side our allies would take.
There's a 0% chance any ally would help out in a civil war vs China situation. Remember - "civil war" will easily be their excuse to not do anything + the whole "well, 1 side is every -ist word in existence!" But China wouldn't bother getting involved in a civil war anyways. Directly I mean. No need. They'll continue doing what they've been doing for 20 years now which is continuing to grab a hold of Africa, Asia, and Europe.
The world is currently held at peace by a philosophy of mutually assured destruction. Every nuclear state is afraid to attack another nuclear state because of the retaliatory strike. If the U.S., and therefore her nuclear capabilities, is compromised or otherwise significantly weakened, I have little doubt we would be attacked by opportunistic nations looking to take advantage of the situation.
I agree that we would. The downside would be that the dems would call for foreign intervention. They'd probably try inviting Chyna to join in.
It depends what the US military does too. And with all the cucks in high positions who knows anymore.
It's not the cucks giving orders that would participate. It's the real human soldiers who would. I'd be surprised to see any less than 75% or orders to suppress or fire on American citizens be ignored or disobeyed outright.
The problem is that globalists would take the opportunity to ally with them.