"The roll call vote on the Crow/Cheney amendment to prevent Trump’s withdrawal plan from Afghanistan is now available. Of the 11 members voting “no,” eight were Republicans (Mo Brooks, Bradley Burne, Austin Scott, Scott DesJarlais, Ralph Abraham, Trent Kelly, Matt Gaetz, Jim Banks) and three were Democrats (Tulsi Gabbard, Anthony Brown, Ro Khanna)."
The house GOP did not vote unanimously, it wasn't even unanimous among house democrats.
I love you Mods but there needs to be some sort of vetting or review process put in place to combat disinformation. It’s getting pretty bad around here with that shit.
He’s not the only one. A lot of things are being stickied here without properly checking the facts. Especially knee jerk reaction shit. I know it must be a bitch to have to dissect every post but we need to nip disinformation in the bud and call them out.
For sure. And I get it, Mods have lives and it would be silly of me to think they can catch everything. I’ve just been noticing more inflammatory things stickied or posted that may not be the whole truth. But, it’s the nature of what we’re dealing with.
Anaconda's a piece of shit. He promotes that Loose Change documentary from like 20 years ago, full of faulty science and bullshit conspiracy theory stuff about how Bush did 9/11. No mention of Brennan being the fucking snake that let them into the U.S.
He's "prolific" (and I use the term generously and with no indications of quality) to the point where you scan a post, and then do a double take because, wait, that can't be right, what I just read was stupid. Then you see: it's Anaconda, and it's like, oh yea, right, moving on.
He was running against John Kerry. Thank God he won. John's a snake in the pocket of Iran. I believe in the Uniparty, but I'd rather have it flavored conservative than traitor.
Our resident snake causes problems to be sure, but this isn't one of them: 11 no votes out of 360? Not exactly "unanimous," but the difference is immaterial.
Fake headline:
"The roll call vote on the Crow/Cheney amendment to prevent Trump’s withdrawal plan from Afghanistan is now available. Of the 11 members voting “no,” eight were Republicans (Mo Brooks, Bradley Burne, Austin Scott, Scott DesJarlais, Ralph Abraham, Trent Kelly, Matt Gaetz, Jim Banks) and three were Democrats (Tulsi Gabbard, Anthony Brown, Ro Khanna)."
The house GOP did not vote unanimously, it wasn't even unanimous among house democrats.
Parent does this over and over and over again. Fake headlines, trolling pictures accompanying stories. He's a massive disinfo poster.
I love you Mods but there needs to be some sort of vetting or review process put in place to combat disinformation. It’s getting pretty bad around here with that shit.
Parent got a sticky yesterday. He doesn't always post disinfo, but I've been noticing it daily from him lately.
He’s not the only one. A lot of things are being stickied here without properly checking the facts. Especially knee jerk reaction shit. I know it must be a bitch to have to dissect every post but we need to nip disinformation in the bud and call them out.
Anaconda is a disinformation and disruptive twat. No idea why that obvious troll has been allowed to remain in this site.
I've had to report a couple times already
No. That’s the same thing that brought us to .win. Disinformation is relative and I’d rather decide for myself and not have a mod do it for me.
I'd rather we function like a real society: everybody knows who the idiot is and keep an eye on him instead of out right banning him.
For sure. And I get it, Mods have lives and it would be silly of me to think they can catch everything. I’ve just been noticing more inflammatory things stickied or posted that may not be the whole truth. But, it’s the nature of what we’re dealing with.
11 no votes our of 360 House seats? I think our resident snake can be forgiven for falsely labeling this "unanimous;" it's not a material difference.
11 no votes out of 360 seats in the House? C'mon, that's damn close to unanimous
User tags would be a nice stop-gap at least.
Seems like y'all just vetted it. Please don't bring censorship here.
It’s not censorship to check facts. If something is incorrect, it’s incorrect. I don’t care who posts it.
Anaconda's a piece of shit. He promotes that Loose Change documentary from like 20 years ago, full of faulty science and bullshit conspiracy theory stuff about how Bush did 9/11. No mention of Brennan being the fucking snake that let them into the U.S.
I've already had a fight with him this week.
I’ve had a few run ins with that fag
I clicked deport on his dumb ass. Hopefully the mods are gods.
He's "prolific" (and I use the term generously and with no indications of quality) to the point where you scan a post, and then do a double take because, wait, that can't be right, what I just read was stupid. Then you see: it's Anaconda, and it's like, oh yea, right, moving on.
He was running against John Kerry. Thank God he won. John's a snake in the pocket of Iran. I believe in the Uniparty, but I'd rather have it flavored conservative than traitor.
For the lulz, obviously
Gotta be. That's the only answer that makes sense.
Fuck anaconda. I hate that guy
Our resident snake causes problems to be sure, but this isn't one of them: 11 no votes out of 360? Not exactly "unanimous," but the difference is immaterial.
The very simple insertion of the word "almost" before unanimous would make the point accurately. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.
All part of his pattern.
True enough. So we've fact checked. 11 Congress critters voted with some sense.
I hope DJT vetoes this anyway. I don't see how it's even legal to make this a law. Congress has not declared war, which is within its power.
Remember folks. These are the same Dems that campaigned against Republicans using being against the Iraq/Afghanistan wars as a platform.
People who voted yes are still names that people like here, which is bad.
So what was Matt Gaetz's reason? (I guess we'll hear it eventually.)
The same reason he voted to restrict Trump's ability to defend the US from attacks by Iran. He is a treasonous snake.