3402
() 🐂 Bullshit 💩
posted ago by KingMoonRacer ago by KingMoonRacer +3402 / -0
Comments (413)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
39
ElGuapo 39 points ago +41 / -2

I love you Mods but there needs to be some sort of vetting or review process put in place to combat disinformation. It’s getting pretty bad around here with that shit.

28
nmipede 28 points ago +29 / -1

Parent got a sticky yesterday. He doesn't always post disinfo, but I've been noticing it daily from him lately.

34
ElGuapo 34 points ago +36 / -2

He’s not the only one. A lot of things are being stickied here without properly checking the facts. Especially knee jerk reaction shit. I know it must be a bitch to have to dissect every post but we need to nip disinformation in the bud and call them out.

4
Mynamesprivate 4 points ago +6 / -2

At the same time, his or her heart could be in the right place, since some of the stuff was stickied and was not disinfo'd. Its on the reader to verify if this is true or not. Plus, theres so much disinfo right now that it may be more "post this, fact check later" to some dudes.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

360 seats in the House. 11 no votes is immaterial.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
27
I_Love_45-70_Gov 27 points ago +31 / -4

Anaconda is a disinformation and disruptive twat. No idea why that obvious troll has been allowed to remain in this site.

3
Salt-N-Pepe 3 points ago +5 / -2

We came here to get away from socks shills and libs like Angela but someone up there gets the lotion on the skin

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
9
DickTick 9 points ago +12 / -3

I've had to report a couple times already

1
FredWinston2.0 1 point ago +3 / -2

No. That’s the same thing that brought us to .win. Disinformation is relative and I’d rather decide for myself and not have a mod do it for me.

1
nmipede 1 point ago +3 / -2

Define "relative disinformation".

Spez: that's exactly the answer I expected. Thanks for playing.

1
FredWinston2.0 1 point ago +1 / -0

And I’m back. I didn’t say “relative disinformation. I said disinformation is relative. Meaning what is disinformation to you may not be to other. Why would you want someone else to decide for you? That’s fucking crazy. You don’t agree?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
txladyvoter 1 point ago +2 / -1

It depends.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
deleted 17 points ago +19 / -2
6
OnlyAmerica 6 points ago +10 / -4

I'd rather we function like a real society: everybody knows who the idiot is and keep an eye on him instead of out right banning him.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
OnlyAmerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why we deport soyboys.

4
ElGuapo 4 points ago +6 / -2

For sure. And I get it, Mods have lives and it would be silly of me to think they can catch everything. I’ve just been noticing more inflammatory things stickied or posted that may not be the whole truth. But, it’s the nature of what we’re dealing with.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +3 / -2

11 no votes our of 360 House seats? I think our resident snake can be forgiven for falsely labeling this "unanimous;" it's not a material difference.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +4 / -2

11 no votes out of 360 seats in the House? C'mon, that's damn close to unanimous

1
jive-ass-turkey 1 point ago +3 / -2

User tags would be a nice stop-gap at least.

-5
Tywappity -5 points ago +10 / -15

Seems like y'all just vetted it. Please don't bring censorship here.

11
ElGuapo 11 points ago +14 / -3

It’s not censorship to check facts. If something is incorrect, it’s incorrect. I don’t care who posts it.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2