According to Twitter: saying “Only females get cervical cancer” is hate speech.
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (95)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Just when you think the height of insanity had been reached, you learn about the imaginary male cervix that upsets corporate truth arbiters when said cervix is logically excluded by a random person on the internet.
Just as elusive as the female prostate.
Are we all going to wake up from this dream or what? I swear to God, things were normal 10 years ago.
Yes. Back when Democrats actually had some form of policy to stand on and debate about.
Look, fat! I'm gonna fundamentally transform this country. C'mon man, if you don't like it, vote for the other Biden! I'm Joe Biden, running for US Senate. Vote Joe 30..3.......3.. Oh I've gone too long.....
No they weren't, 0bama was President!
I feel like these examples have been going on for years now and it’s really getting old. We all know where Twitter, and YouTube, and Facebook and all the rest stand. Get off of it then. Quit complaining about these companies because they clearly won’t change. Unless legal action is finally taken it’s just getting old.
Why do you think this place was made? We’re doing exactly what you just said to do.
But the truth is, places like Twitter, FB, etc are poisoning millions of people’s minds. And they will get progressively worse as time moves forward.
We can only hope that they all get stripped of their Section 230 protections soon enough. And putting a spotlight on examples of them acting as biased publishers will hopefully help make that happen.
I don't think they're poisoning anyone's minds. The "people" there are either radicals, bots supporting them, or foreigners.
Don't forget the loud woke crowd is only 6% of the population.
They might be, but they are responsible for shifting the Overton Window a ridiculous amount to the delusional progressive left over the past decade. We can't ignore that.
Yes and those radicals get their messages amplified in order to create a false sense of that ideology being the norm. Gaslighting and astroturfing make this happen just like you said.
The more people see something as being the norm, the more open they are to going along with it.
Masks, social distancing, and business shutdowns became the “norm” after China virus hit.
Look how many people jumped on that bandwagon and accepted it as their “new normal.”
🤡🌎
We should start an awareness ribbon campaign for "female prostate cancer".
They're getting you on the technicality of these new (fake) gender definitions. The way to get around it is to say "Only genetic females get cervical cancer". This forces them to differentiate sex from gender.
Good point. But also why couldn't they just assume you referenced genetic females if it was unspecified? Please try your technique and let me know how it goes on social media.
It doesn't allow people to interpret your comment the way they want to. You're talking about biological sex.
The root of the problem is they're banning on the fallacy of equivocation, not even bothering to establish if the writer meant "sex" vs new conceptions of "gender". By specifying genetic, you deny them their ability to fuck you over with these technicalities.
Sex and gender are synonyms, don't let anyone tell you otherwise
You and I know that, but you bypass their game by forcing the definition
Once a given definition no longer suits thier purposes they change the definition.
If they are reasonable it should work.
Even if they aren't, you're demonstrating that they're logically bankrupt.
nah, don't play their stupid word games. Just say "only to mentally ill perverts and their enablers. You need help." and leave it at that. "fuck off you sick pervert" also works, if you're pressed for time.
Female means XX.
Male means XY.
There are multiple other chromosomal abnormalities which result in something more or less one or the other (XO Turners, etc.).
They can fuck all they like with pronouns, but these words do mean genetic. Appending "genetic" to what already fully specifies that is asinine and I refuse.
Why don't we force them to append "quasi-" in front of the actual, factual word to indicate to everyone it's their made-up definition?
They neatly bypass this with phrases like "cervix-havers," as in "Cervix-havers can get cervical cancer - after all, men have cervixes, too."
Not when you are a genetic male. No genetic male has a cervix no matter what the position about gender is.
"Genetics are not a factor of maleness."
/yes I know this is an insane argument
//refugee from RightwingLGBT - you haven't even gotten close to the crazy crest regarding sex and gender, trust me
They already do this. That's the problem.
Never seen an example, got one?
Sure. For instance, a man might identify as a woman because although his sex is male, his gender is female. That's their definition.
🤡🌎
Honk mother-fucking honk!
I got a ban for posting a screen shot fbi crime statistics and another time for calling Jill stein a retard
Twatter is allergic to truth
Only guys can get erectile dysfunction. Banned
Party of science everyone...
2 + 2 = 5
Aight. So are they going to shut up about how men don't have a say on abortion because they "cant get pregnant", or are they just flipping when it's convenient?
Search, deep within your heart, and there, shall you find the answer.
Cancer is sexist. Boycott cancer!
I wonder if stating the facts that "only men can get prostate cancer" or "only African Americans get sickle cell anemia" would get you sent to twitter's give us more of your information and let us reeducate you camp.
These people are erasing biological females.
I got suspended for saying "Liberalism is a mental disorder". My account was blocked instantly.
I hit 'appeal' and after one week, nothing.
Then I canceled the appeal and it banned my account altogether for 7 days.
@OP - they will never check your appeal. They don't plan to. They probably have your account flagged as a Trump supporter and your appeal goes in the 'let's see how long these idiots wait' bin. It's a self-imposed ban.
It takes a long time. Some jerk had a friend's non political cookie cutter account banned as spam for "insulting" a celebrity.
Twitter responded to appeal 2 months later agreeing there was no spam.
Don't you like science bro
But it's not true.
Soyboys get cervical cancer too...........
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LukyMYp2noo
Holy shit, 'Pede. Could we have at least got a warning first? WTF?
I don't think there are enough honks in the universe for this one. Lmfao
Truth of any kind is offensive to liberals.
Stating a biological fact of nature is “hateful conduct.”
Lmao I’ve always heard the term “hate facts” but assumed it was to poke fun at stupid leftists.
But by God here it is. These people belong in asylums, not controlling our media, schools, and online forums.
These people are poison to everything they touch. Absolute lunatics living in an alternate reality than the rest of the world.
And every shred of power they have needs to be dismantled and given back to those who are willing to live in objective reality.
I for one enjoy my male cervix. Get FUCKED!
dunno what this means, just want to say this now that im not on reddit. 🤡🌎
Insanity. Funny how the left thinks that a person who wears clothing or hairstyle of another race has committed the cardinal "sin" of "appropriation", yet individuals can appropriate the characteristics and behaviors of another sex and that is just fine. These people are nuts....nuts I tell you.
Fortunately, my Mother, who was a noted OB/GYN, is no longer alive to see this insanity. I can just hear what her response would have been to such anti-science and reality tripe such as this, and it would not have been pleasant. I still remember when she told her "nurse", at the end of her illness, that said "nurse" should have her brain removed, sliced in small sections, sent to a pathologist and studied, as she was so stupid and incompetent.( Note: the nurse WAS a moron, and I fired her the next day. :)
But her harshest condemnation would be for a medical profession that seems all to eager to cower under the ravings of lunatics. This is madness.
I love to point this out when this kind of shit comes up on twit. I congratulate men for finally winning the battle of the sexes by seizing womanhood. It’s true, though.
It’s also true that it’s driven primarily by white men. If it were just Asian men that wanted to be women, or if it were just black men that wanted to be women, this issue would have zero political muscle.
The only reason “Black Lives Matter” has any power now is because it’s what white liberal men are into right now.
Interesting point. It gives me some nefarious ideas.......
those pesky females with real female parts....
they hate us for our freedoms ....
Twitter is a science denier?
Yeah well according to Twitter mentally ill men who wear makeup and dresses and have stapled on "tits" are women so of course that qualifies as hateful you bigot.
It’s considered hate to believe it’s caused by a mental disorder, even if you sincerely think they should be helped.
I thought that vaping was the leading cause of cervical cancer in men?
if so, i suggest they're doing it wrong.
If by vaping you mean having smoke blown up your ass by leftists... then I suppose that is true.
🤣
There are absolutely no differences of any kind between males and femaies.
Also it is the gravest insult to refer to me as male instead of female.
Peak fucking clown world.
I imagine 1,000,000 SJW faggots just said "PEAK clown world? Hold my wife's boyfriend's beer"
don't encourage them.
Wife? These soy turds don’t marry. They’ll get tats, but marriage? That’s just too PERMANENT!
How does denying the mangina even equates hate?! Next denying Allah will be an offense?
The party of science, people.
Well shit y'all, I guess this lady-pede can get prostate cancer then. /s
Every time you post on Twitter, you commit a homosexual act. Reading POTUS is fine though.
Anyway, this trans 'debate' is just nonsense argument between Retard A, and Retard B. Who is right? Usually neither of them. Don't cut of your dick fellas.
Don’t go hating on the mentally ill.
Bigger question is why the fuck you still using twitter?
"only females are female" = ban
"it's okay to be white" = ban
"2+2 ALWAYS = 4, regardless of culture." = ban
"evil exists" = ban
"it is wrong to murder babies" = ban
how much additional evidence do we need to condemn this evil, and how much force will be required to divorce ourselves from it?
I fear the answer.
More hate speech: only men can get their balls waxed
Up is down, left is right, war is peace.
So, somebody somewhere is mad that they're not going to get cervical cancer someday. Notice the poster didn't say only real females. It trickles down from a major thing, to little things. Soon there won't be anythings left, then what?
I wonder if only cervixes can only get cervical cancer would trigger the same result.
Maybe say Only people who have a cervix can get cervical cancer.
Biology is hate speech. 🤡🌎
Not sure how that's a hateful conduct.
Anyway- https://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Michael-Douglas-cancer-linked-to-oral-sex-4576087.php
They are the party of anti-science, anti-enlightenment, and anti-reason. You know, in layman's terms, BAT SHIT CRAZY!!
Damn....the patriarchy takes another one away from women.
I got banned for saying traitors should be executed