The Civil Rights act was enacted specifically to demean Whites, Males, Christians and Heterosexuals. That is because if the Constitution was followed correctly, no special rights were required to guarantee equal protection for all those who are generally law abiding. So in a sense, they simple were looking for a way to uplift criminals and ne'er do wells in society at the expense of the civil. That isn't to say all civility is based on protected characteristics, though.
Well you might think "everyone must be treated equally" means "everyone must be treated equally", but thankfully our wonderful courts have repeatedly ruled that it actually means "everyone must be treated equally*" where the * is a caveat that I'd you're white, you can be discriminated against in all manner of ways.
Thankfully the greatest judicial minds our nation has produced have been able to determine that two wrongs make a right, and have correctly and properly been able to interpret the plain English uses in our Constitution for us. I don't know what we'd do without their help.
The Supreme Court has ruled that discrimination against whites is legal, because it is correcting for past injustices against blacks (2 wrongs = 1 right).
However, over the years they seem to be taking the opinion that less extreme measures need to be taken now that 50 plus years have passed since the civil rights movement. So they have ruled that quota systems are not legal, and in Gratz v Bollinger ruled that awarding points towards admission based on race is also not legal.
They should've ruled that the civil rights act was unconstitutional from the start, despite it ostensibly being well-intentioned.
University of Michigan was taken to court to stop affirmative action in admissions. The court said you can't have quotas, but all he other BS like weighting is perfectly fine. Affirmative action lives on and it's useless trying to take it to court again.
Question everything. The way progressives work, they manufacture a minor problem, eg. No gay cakes, then turn it into a massive theft of rights for everyone else.
I had a very liberal teacher in high school that did a good job redpilling me back in the day because she basically hated on America all the time. Read Machiavelli, or just treat all governments and politicians as psychopaths whose only pursuit is more power. Then everything makes a lot more sense, and you realize that every well-intentioned thing (Civil Rights Act, PATRIOT Act, etc.) is actually a scheme concocted to increase someone's power, and it's never for the stated reasons or for some touchy feely B.S. reasons.
Not necessarily, sometimes it's just a manner of trying to get to their wealth.
I'd argue that 2nd degree is more of a hate crime, it's a crime of passion (anger, jealousy, etc.)
I have always had a problem with "Hate Laws". Murder in the 1st degree, is murder in the 1st degree. Assault is assault. I'm going to assume that the person hated the other person by committing these crimes.
But what hate crime laws really set up was the beginning of the "oppressed" versus "victim" narrative. It was also a way for the Globalists to force mass migration down the throats of native populations and criminalize any push back to it as "hate".
Hate crime laws seem like a form of double jeopardy. When someone commits a crime the motivations should be considered when sentencing (if found guilty). What hate crime laws do is not only federalize the crime but also create a second, separate burden against the accused. And, of course, hate crime laws have historically been a one-way street meant to only hurt accused white males and help everyone else. Even if the application of hate crime laws was "fair" I'd still be against them because they're redundant.
Liberals are like children of a certain age: 1) old enough to know right from wrong, that what they are doing is stupid and unacceptable, 2) but not old enough to reason with.
The answer: turn them over your knee and bust their ass.
Make these assholes in local government personally responsible for the damage they caused by withholding police.
Make them write out big checks. Punishment is the only way they get the message.
Because "Diversity" is a compelling state interest that supersedes the equal protection clause. It's right there in the Constitution along with the right to abortion and absolute judicial supremacy over laws.
Fuck Sandra Day O'Connor. And Fuck us for not recognizing the Supreme Court and the Judicial Branch for what it is. A bunch of fucking lawyers pretending to arrive at conclusions based on evidence. When in fact they seek evidence only after they made their conclusions.
This is absolutely correct. I work as a Criminal Defense lawyer and some of these aspects are bleeding into other areas of the law. For example, in my State, speedy trial rights have been tolled due to "exceptional circumstances". However, our local government authorized a protest of 2000 people. We can permit a 2000 person protest but it's too dangerous to hold a 12 person jury trial? I will be presenting this argument on a few cases in the fall.
That's where your corporate HR department comes in. They can keep you from mentioning this fact in public, or exercising your rights if you want to keep feeding your family.
Since when does the Constitution matter to either party. Just ONE example, the 02nd Amendment, they have passed 'laws' that restrict it the famous '06 ways to Sunday'. If you think that is good, recall Roger Stone can never own a firearm now.
I'd just be happy if this country actually went back to following the constitution at all. It's like every day it becomes more and more a suggestion rather than the law of the land.
It was successfully applied to the Selective Service/Draft. The SS registration system was ruled unconstitutional as it discriminated against men under 14th Amendment. So there's that.
Intention should NEVER have been brought in to criminal criteria, under law. This genie was released when murder required malice... Hate crime is nonsense, because crime is crime; but SINCE it is law -- it must be enforced bilaterally omnilaterally.
When can we file suit against the systemic racism and lack of diversity in pro sports, they should represent/reflect the multicultural patchwork of the country. 3 blacks 3 Asians, 3 Whites, 3 Hispanics on the field per football team, etc.... muh diversity!
I just never understood hate crimes in general. Like is there Love crimes?
Like do racist BLM think a white person would shoot them and kill them out of love? Like "ohhh your soo oppressed by the MAN huh? here take this 9mm bullet and go to sleep, shhhh".
The whole protected class bullshit just needs to end.
Yes. It does
It'll end the moment the DoJ starts enforcing the law equally.
Absolutely unacceptable that we still have a two tiered justice system
The Civil Rights act was enacted specifically to demean Whites, Males, Christians and Heterosexuals. That is because if the Constitution was followed correctly, no special rights were required to guarantee equal protection for all those who are generally law abiding. So in a sense, they simple were looking for a way to uplift criminals and ne'er do wells in society at the expense of the civil. That isn't to say all civility is based on protected characteristics, though.
Well you might think "everyone must be treated equally" means "everyone must be treated equally", but thankfully our wonderful courts have repeatedly ruled that it actually means "everyone must be treated equally*" where the * is a caveat that I'd you're white, you can be discriminated against in all manner of ways.
Thankfully the greatest judicial minds our nation has produced have been able to determine that two wrongs make a right, and have correctly and properly been able to interpret the plain English uses in our Constitution for us. I don't know what we'd do without their help.
And they haven't done it because the woke judiciary would allow it. Need a true conservative majority.
The "conservatives" justices are too busy expanding the list of protected groups.
They seem to blatantly side against us all the time. Our whole government is completely fucked.
I think Gorsuch just has a set of very rigid beliefs about small government, and that gets used by the liberal justices to form a majority.
Then again, expanding protected classes is anything but small government.
Gratz v. Bollinger
The Supreme Court has ruled that discrimination against whites is legal, because it is correcting for past injustices against blacks (2 wrongs = 1 right).
However, over the years they seem to be taking the opinion that less extreme measures need to be taken now that 50 plus years have passed since the civil rights movement. So they have ruled that quota systems are not legal, and in Gratz v Bollinger ruled that awarding points towards admission based on race is also not legal.
They should've ruled that the civil rights act was unconstitutional from the start, despite it ostensibly being well-intentioned.
University of Michigan was taken to court to stop affirmative action in admissions. The court said you can't have quotas, but all he other BS like weighting is perfectly fine. Affirmative action lives on and it's useless trying to take it to court again.
I can’t believe I never really thought about it or questioned it that deeply when actually it’s super fucked up.
Question everything. The way progressives work, they manufacture a minor problem, eg. No gay cakes, then turn it into a massive theft of rights for everyone else.
I had a very liberal teacher in high school that did a good job redpilling me back in the day because she basically hated on America all the time. Read Machiavelli, or just treat all governments and politicians as psychopaths whose only pursuit is more power. Then everything makes a lot more sense, and you realize that every well-intentioned thing (Civil Rights Act, PATRIOT Act, etc.) is actually a scheme concocted to increase someone's power, and it's never for the stated reasons or for some touchy feely B.S. reasons.
YEP! White people are a minority in California.
Only 62% whites in the country. Thats down from like 87% when i was a kid. And blacks have gone down too. Hmm i wonder what the rest are?
Completely unconstitutional. Suspension of logic to boot!
How is first-degree murder of ANYBODY not a hate crime?
If you murder somebody, you hate them.
??? How do we put up with this???
Not necessarily, sometimes it's just a manner of trying to get to their wealth. I'd argue that 2nd degree is more of a hate crime, it's a crime of passion (anger, jealousy, etc.)
I have always had a problem with "Hate Laws". Murder in the 1st degree, is murder in the 1st degree. Assault is assault. I'm going to assume that the person hated the other person by committing these crimes.
But what hate crime laws really set up was the beginning of the "oppressed" versus "victim" narrative. It was also a way for the Globalists to force mass migration down the throats of native populations and criminalize any push back to it as "hate".
14 amendment is Racist!
Edit- Thanks for the gold, stranger!
Edit2- Since this is the highest of voted comment in the thread I just want a hijack it to raise Social awareness about racists.
Edit3- Racists are literally discriminating against our pedophiles and other POCs (Link to indoctrination ‘news’ story)
—- Reddit 2020
That was a rollercoaster
Hate crime laws seem like a form of double jeopardy. When someone commits a crime the motivations should be considered when sentencing (if found guilty). What hate crime laws do is not only federalize the crime but also create a second, separate burden against the accused. And, of course, hate crime laws have historically been a one-way street meant to only hurt accused white males and help everyone else. Even if the application of hate crime laws was "fair" I'd still be against them because they're redundant.
Hate crime laws are literally hate crimes
Liberals are like children of a certain age: 1) old enough to know right from wrong, that what they are doing is stupid and unacceptable, 2) but not old enough to reason with.
The answer: turn them over your knee and bust their ass.
Make these assholes in local government personally responsible for the damage they caused by withholding police.
Make them write out big checks. Punishment is the only way they get the message.
When a child knows THEY will be personally responsible …. The shenanigans stop
Y.E.S.
Y.E.S. it is.
Because "Diversity" is a compelling state interest that supersedes the equal protection clause. It's right there in the Constitution along with the right to abortion and absolute judicial supremacy over laws.
Fuck Sandra Day O'Connor. And Fuck us for not recognizing the Supreme Court and the Judicial Branch for what it is. A bunch of fucking lawyers pretending to arrive at conclusions based on evidence. When in fact they seek evidence only after they made their conclusions.
This is absolutely correct. I work as a Criminal Defense lawyer and some of these aspects are bleeding into other areas of the law. For example, in my State, speedy trial rights have been tolled due to "exceptional circumstances". However, our local government authorized a protest of 2000 people. We can permit a 2000 person protest but it's too dangerous to hold a 12 person jury trial? I will be presenting this argument on a few cases in the fall.
Keep up the great work. And thank you for defending the people and the Constitution!!!
It looks like white people are slowly but surely becoming identarians. Uh oh world. Looks like were reaching the final stage of identity politics.
Oy Vey! Shut it down.
Questions are for haters there goy
Im actually convinced this was the goal all along. The bankers profit of the major violent conflicts that arise from this by financing both sides.
That's where your corporate HR department comes in. They can keep you from mentioning this fact in public, or exercising your rights if you want to keep feeding your family.
But I dont protest bro! I got a job and a family to feed!
Crimes are crimes. If you assault someone for being gay, rich, poor, drunk, or just annoying at a particular moment, it’s the same crime.
Well it’s a living breathing document and commies like killing living (though not yet breathing) things
"That's where you're wrong, bucko! It's only unconstitutional when I say it is." - Hawaii judge.
The fact that such a beautiful state is home to such corrupt judges is a real tragedy.
Hawaii sucks anyway. Let the Japanese have it.
Lol. So true.
Can you believe this is even a question? Idiocracy in real life
Since when does the Constitution matter to either party. Just ONE example, the 02nd Amendment, they have passed 'laws' that restrict it the famous '06 ways to Sunday'. If you think that is good, recall Roger Stone can never own a firearm now.
I'd just be happy if this country actually went back to following the constitution at all. It's like every day it becomes more and more a suggestion rather than the law of the land.
well that doesnt stop the law from being applied. a bunch of shit is unconstitutional right now and apparently that doesnt change anything
This obsession with racial equality is destroying the military, law enforcement, political appointments and education.
Let's get Justice Roberts to take this up. Oh, wait.
Hate crime laws are a violation of the 1st Amendment and criminalize constitutionally protected speech.
You're laboring under the impression that the 14th Amendment applies equally to everyone. Dispel that notion.
Sorry, I'm becoming bitter. You are right, in principle.
It was successfully applied to the Selective Service/Draft. The SS registration system was ruled unconstitutional as it discriminated against men under 14th Amendment. So there's that.
Intention should NEVER have been brought in to criminal criteria, under law. This genie was released when murder required malice... Hate crime is nonsense, because crime is crime; but SINCE it is law -- it must be enforced
bilaterallyomnilaterally.SINCE… exactly!!!
Yes, but you will have to prove that there is selective prosecution and that would take a lot of time and energy
Makes sense.
We'll see, according to our wonderful Supreme Court, unequal treatment under the law is constitutional because two wrongs make a right.
See their past rulings on affirmative action as an example.
Yep
When can we file suit against the systemic racism and lack of diversity in pro sports, they should represent/reflect the multicultural patchwork of the country. 3 blacks 3 Asians, 3 Whites, 3 Hispanics on the field per football team, etc.... muh diversity!
I just never understood hate crimes in general. Like is there Love crimes?
Like do racist BLM think a white person would shoot them and kill them out of love? Like "ohhh your soo oppressed by the MAN huh? here take this 9mm bullet and go to sleep, shhhh".
Honestly this anti-white bullshit is an extension of the Democrat diversity politics.
How cute, this guy over here thinks laws still matter... Equal application is a myth.
only a RAYSIS would make this claim!!!!
👍👍👍
Be careful what you ask for, the Democrats had no problem repealing California's civil rights laws.
The Leftist dream for America !!!