I do get your basic point I just think it might be a stretch unless part of the overall "wait it out until Biden or someone else gets in" strategy. but they didn't bribe 400+ members of congress so our companies are benefiting bigly or moreso with us there.
Yeah I mean I don't know why they'd want to push that but money is usually the most apparent reason. Another reason is tying resources to a fixed place.
Another reason could be to make it easier to spark a conflict there. They're more interested in a change of leadership right now, in the US, than they are fixing prices. China is asshoe, but China is smart asshoe. They think further ahead than that, usually. For China, the big jackpot is a Democrat president.
Yeah the u.s. being oversea is vulnerable to chicanery as you said they can very well pay the Taliban and others to potentially create more conflict on and on. The u.s. remaining over seas presents opportunities to create propaganda of a varied nature
Cheaper doesn't mean better
I do get your basic point I just think it might be a stretch unless part of the overall "wait it out until Biden or someone else gets in" strategy. but they didn't bribe 400+ members of congress so our companies are benefiting bigly or moreso with us there.
Yeah I mean I don't know why they'd want to push that but money is usually the most apparent reason. Another reason is tying resources to a fixed place.
Another reason could be to make it easier to spark a conflict there. They're more interested in a change of leadership right now, in the US, than they are fixing prices. China is asshoe, but China is smart asshoe. They think further ahead than that, usually. For China, the big jackpot is a Democrat president.
Yeah the u.s. being oversea is vulnerable to chicanery as you said they can very well pay the Taliban and others to potentially create more conflict on and on. The u.s. remaining over seas presents opportunities to create propaganda of a varied nature