4866
Comments (373)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
magalead 11 points ago +13 / -2

Do you have any facts to back up your political assertation? Because Publix has always been based as fuck. They don’t let their associates do anything political, which includes wearing Marxist BLM hats and pins. And they hold the line, unlike that faggot from Chick Fil A.

And you know what? Not allowing anything political is a great thing because I don’t go there to see politics, I go there to get groceries and a fucking chicken tender sub.

The left is always trying to cancel Publix here in Florida, so before you do the same thing, provide some evidence faggot.

4
JacketlessJimJordan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes to the chicken tenders sub. A Publix delicacy.

2
DonaldJYeet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Deserves moar upvotes. Publix chicken tender subs are incredible. Also publix likely limited the purchase so people don't see empty shelves and say "OmG PuBlix is boYcotting GoYa"

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
2
Block_Helen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't get it. There's a run on a certain brand, they're limiting the sale of that brand so that they don't get cleaned out (as fast). Meaning more customers can enjoy based Goya.

Publix is a great company. I really don't think this is being done to suppress sales of Goya at all.

0
magalead 0 points ago +4 / -4

Damn, you’re a fucking illogical idiot. Let me school you on something:

Causation doesn’t imply correlation. Just because they put a sign on GOYA foods, and not the other brands, DOES NOT mean it was politically motivated. Show me the proof that it was politically motivated because maybe they have a large Hispanic population in that area, and want to keep people from hoarding the GOYA so customers who actually use the food can have it, instead of buying it to make what amounts to a political statement? Show me where this is a strictly political statement. You know, proof. The burden is on you because you’re make bold claims without showing any proof.

And of course, if you don’t have a Publix near you, you probably don’t know what the company is about. Oh and yes, of course I have the same info as you, which is why you’re an idiot for jumping to conclusions before having more evidence to back your dumb claims up.

Please get the fuck out of here and go back to sticking your head up your ass. You’re doing the exact same thing the left does... making claims with no factual basis.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
0
magalead 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’m not upset about fucking Publix. I know what kind of company they are and obviously you don’t.

I’m calling you out for spewing concern troll BS, doing exactly what the left does, and all around dumbfuckery while thinking you have a logical argument.

First of all, show me in my comment where I give a concrete answer one way or the other. What I did was suggest that there is a simple explanation for why they are limiting the sale of this brand, i.e., there could be various explanations and you are jumping to a conclusion that may not necessarily be true, and you need to back your shit up with facts. No, it ISN’T obvious that this is a political statement. You took one picture post on Win and made a huge accusation, and you know what? Yeah, I take people who are calling for boycotts of a traditionally conservative company seriously. Publix has continuously stood up to the left and I want them to be around to continue to do so.

So yeah, you’re a concern troll and have been reported as such. How do I know you’re not a lefty coming into our domain and trying to gin up a boycott?

Try again faggot.