4093
Comments (344)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
38
RedditIs4Retards 38 points ago +39 / -1

Death rate is probably lower.

15
debacle 15 points ago +15 / -0

The rate of deaths to positive tests is like 0.004, and based on what we know about testing it's assumed that we're catching less than 33% of all positives, so the assumption is the true death rate is (at worst) about 0.0016. The flu death rate is 0.001.

If you assume that either COVID deaths are being trumped up (probably true) or that we're catching fewer than 33% of all positives (also probably true), the true death rate is likely lower.

33
Pats5x 33 points ago +33 / -0

The guy in CO who drank himself to death, ended up a .55 BAC and was listed as a wuhan flu death did it for me....this whole fucking thing is a political tool...sure, some people get sick and die from it....well, people get sick and die from the flu...open up the fucking country

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
9
Barbs 9 points ago +9 / -0

The only places requiring masks here in Northern California are national chains with a strong management structure, like Costco. I can go in Home Depot without a mask and nobody cares, but Costco won’t let you through the door.

Mask compliance appears to be roughly 50-60% where I live, indoors, but barely anybody is wearing them outside. They pull them off as soon as they exit the establishment.

8
SirPokeSmottington 8 points ago +8 / -0

And what do you do when your tiny little rural town issues mandatory mask mandates? When you are getting denied essential services for not complying?

  1. Tell them you have a medical issue

  2. Tell them nothing else

  3. If they deny you service, sue them for medical discrimination

  4. Profit

2
lococholo 2 points ago +3 / -1

Move.

1
krog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have a link to anything on this? I'd love to have this example.

SPEZ:

I found it here if anybody else wants to read on it.

0
Paek 0 points ago +1 / -1

But this is always true, we do that with influenza as well

13
Shakakka99 13 points ago +13 / -0

It'll be impossible to know, now that they've moved the goalposts and changed what they're counting as "covid cases" these days. Going by their previous description, it might be slightly higher than the flu. But going by their "had prior contact with a covid patient and exhibiting a symptom" bullshit? The data is tainted.

8
Randomite 8 points ago +8 / -0

And how to filter out 'multiple positives' by the same patient. Are those counted as multiple cases? I think the numbers have gotten so messed up at this point, and the WH can't release any lack of confidence in these numbers because of losing face to the nation. When the tell-all books come out from Fauci and the other testing team members in a couple of years, this is going to reveal a complete CF behind the scenes with these numbers. We were woefully unprepared for a pandemic. Surprise!

8
MehNahMehNah 8 points ago +8 / -0

Co-morbities throw the death count off

5
SirPokeSmottington 5 points ago +5 / -0

Co-morbities throw the death count off

Such as being OVER the average age of death for humans.