Or is this one of those gravity vs. the strong/weak nuclear force basic contradictions of our scientific theories? (Yeah two of the basic forces in the universe don't harmonize. At all. So "dark matter" and "string theory" and we don't even know anything about how the universe actually works... but yeah, "muh science.")
Am I supposed to pretend these contradictions don't exist?
Anybody demanding vaccines, social distancing, or masks are ADMITTING THEY CAN'T ADAPT OR SURVIVE and are begging to be culled based on the principles of "adaptation of species" and "survival of the fittest". These injection practices contradict the very principle of supposedly "scientific" theories that the strong can and will adapt. Wouldn't vaccines interrupt that natural and necessary process of selection?
I CAN'T KEEP UP WITH ALL THE MENTAL CALISTHENICS HERE GUYS. How does anybody support the idea of vaccine theory? It's the most absurd, stupid thing I've ever heard, but you'd think it was some kind of holy, state-sponsored, Babylonian religion. It contradicts both religion and modern science I was told to abandon religion for. CHILDREN CANNOT CONSENT TO PENETRATION/INJECTION, NOR CAN THEY BE PROPERLY ADVISED OF THE RISKS. It's pure illogical evil. Oh yeah and taxpayers have to pay for injuries. That's right. You pay for it when your child can't focus or smile for 15 years.
None of it makes sense!
Adaptation through natural selection requires the death or sterilization of the poorly adapted. What Sweden did - not locking down - is what natural selection really boils down to. The people that can be killed by the virus will be.
A vaccine provides a weakened version of the virus on which the body's immune system can train. Training the immune system with this allows the immune system to clear a virus without it doing too much damage to tissue.
If you don't want to get a vaccine - don't.
Counterpoint: The brain is an adaptation to survive. The brain comes up with the vaccine. Scientific creation beats viruses, and scientific creation only occurs because of an adaptation.
Your argument reminds me of human exceptionalism where people say that humans are special. Either they're especially ruinous to the planet, or they are especially gifted by a creator to use up all the resources of the planet, etc.
In either case, human exceptionalism says that humans are rather unnatural beings.
Like pollution. Is it unnatural? The crude oil is naturally created. The human is naturally created. The brain that transforms the oil into a working fuel is naturally created.
Did you know
https://static.secure.website/wscfus/9167827/uploads/Hansen_52_million_2C_7_8C.png
Right now we're much cooler and far more climate stable than we were in the Pleistocene era.
Looking at that graph, how many times have the polar ice caps melted in the current historical era? Every peak in temp along that graph for the last 50,000 years basically tells us where the polar caps melted.
This is normal.
Humans are normal.
Gas pollution into atmosphere is normal.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't worry about our pollution and other issues. It dosen't mean we shouldn't try to moderate ourselves. It does mean that, like so many other issues, people use HUMAN EXCEPTIONALISM to claim why human are the root of all evil/all good.
In the extreme, the environuts think it'd be a good idea to ACTIVELY CULL the human population. Like Greta Thunberg on autistic steroids.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/29/a-brief-history-of-climate-panic-and-crisis-both-warming-and-cooling/
Fear = Funding.
Maybe this equation tells us how BLM is getting its motility.
Second point: Vaccines are an adaptation to the environment, gained from the brain, the previous adaptation. What species have to do by random chance and mutation, science has allowed humans to do by thinking and testing. After all, testing is basically "simulated death" in order to avoid real death.
However, maybe indiscriminate vaccine distribution is what gives rise to DYSGENICS. If you allow the weakest to survive and breed, you end up with more weakness, until your entire species is totally dependent on science to survive, and any break in this technological armor causes a massive die off event.