3891
Comments (798)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
SecondProtectsFirst 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s different because being disabled is considered a protected class and you can’t use that as a reason to deny service.

That was what the whole point of the gay wedding cake case was. The couple was going from bakery to bakery trying to get someone to deny them service so they could sue and establish case law for homosexuality being a protected class.

5
Bearsgrrr 5 points ago +5 / -0

They can't wear a mask because of a disability. So in effect they are denying entry because of a disability. They have to build expensive restrooms, etc to accommodate a disability. They can Damon sure let you shop because of a disability.

-2
SecondProtectsFirst -2 points ago +1 / -3

I totally agree, but claiming you have a disability just to get your way when you’re not actually disabled is some entitled leftist “my dog is a service animal” level shit. We shouldn’t take advantage of that rule because people with actual disabilities deserve not to be hassled when entitled jackasses ruin it for them.

1
Bearsgrrr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bullshit . It's using their rules against them . We need to start fighting back.