It's an academic publication. How about you stop being retarded and view it. There's really no excuse for your ignorance here... and I don't wear a mask in spite of evidence like this because I have other concerns (effects of excessive CO2 inhalation, effects on general immunity not being exposed to pathogens).
In conclusion, we have measured the filtration efficiencies of various commonly available fabrics for use as cloth masks in filtering particles in the significant (for aerosol-based virus transmission) size range of ∼10 nm to ∼6 μm and have presented filtration efficiency data as a function of aerosol particle size. We find that cotton, natural silk, and chiffon can provide good protection, typically above 50% in the entire 10 nm to 6.0 μm range, provided they have a tight weave. Higher threads per inch cotton with tighter weaves resulted in better filtration efficiencies.
Me: provides evidence
Some retard: tHeReS nO eViDEncE eVr
What is the link? I don't click on links that don't identify themselves easily.
It shows that any random cloth covering will ACTUALLY FILTER virus sized sub micron particles!?
It's an academic publication. How about you stop being retarded and view it. There's really no excuse for your ignorance here... and I don't wear a mask in spite of evidence like this because I have other concerns (effects of excessive CO2 inhalation, effects on general immunity not being exposed to pathogens).
You are saying that publication says that any cloth will filter sub micron sized virus particles?
Please copy and paste that part for me.