I don’t know. This actually seems more racist against black people because it is essentially saying these are traits that white people have different from black people. I’m truly can’t believe someone thinks most of that stuff is bad.
If you take out the rugged individualism and swap English and Christianity, these same principles can be applied to Asians, Indians and even Nigerian Americans. These fucking idiots can see the formula for success but are too mentally challenged to actually follow it. It’s like an obese asshole complaining how they eat shit junk food but never lose weight
It's all excellent. However spicy food is ok. Especially if made by GOYA. And maybe children don't need their own rooms. Plenty of successful immigrant children did not each have their own rooms. They knew to not talk to someone who is studying in the same room.
As for judging men by their personal qualities and abilities, and not their physical beauty, that is better. The Calvin Klein thing about how men have to be pretty has been a disaster.
Normalized over time? I think you mean THIS IS WHAT BUILT AMERICA. This has not "become standard practice", THIS IS THE FORMULA ON HOW TO BE SUCCESSFUL. It doesn't matter wtf your skin color is, follow this chart and your life will be better than anyone of any race who goes against it.
Why would a museum of one specific culture have displays about other cultures? It makes about as much sense as seeing a treatise on Hinduism or the history of settlements around the Euphrates river at an Amish cultural centre.
Unless there is some trolly meta-commentary in play that there isn't enough African culture or history worth talking about, not enough to fill the building?
The points made under Rugged Individualism, Emphasis on Scientific Method, Protestant Work Ethic, many of the points under "Status, Power, & Authority", having a Future Orientation, Time, Justice, and Communication.
So, seeing as how this article is about the problems with "Whiteness", am... am I a White Supremacist?
I continued reading, here's what is wrong with "Whiteness", according to the Article:
Internalization of Whiteness and White Dominant Culture
Racism is perpetuated by deeming whiteness as superior and other racial and ethnic groups as inferior. The prevalence of white dominant culture and racism leads to an internalized racial superiority for those who adhere to it. This internalized dominance "describes the experience and attitudes of those who are members of the dominant, privileged, or powerful identity groups. Members of the [dominant] group accept their group's socially superior status as normal and deserved." [as defined by CARED: Calgary Anti-Racism Education(link is external)]
So, I am a racist with a since of internalized racial superiority and internalized dominance. Extending beyond that:
White nationalism is a concept born out of white supremacy. A key difference is a focus on nationhood. White nationalists in the United States advocate for a country that is only for the white race due to feelings of entitlement and racial superiority. They also believe that the diversity of people in the United States will lead to the destruction of whiteness and white culture - hence, the correlation to white supremacist ideology.
So, if i believe in those concepts and those ideologies, i'm a white supremacist?
Need to work on your understanding of some basics.
“White nationalism” is born out of wanting to be left alone and based on some of the most fundamental human rights: self-determination and freedom of association. Black nationalists seek exactly the same. Actually, in-group preference is universal, out-group preference or indifference is maladaptive from an evolutionary standpoint.
How can you be a supremacist in a homogeneous society? Are Japanese “supremacists”? White nationalists per definition therefore cannot be supremacists—a fact. Supremacism, intentional or not, only enters the occasion in mixed societies when one group dominates. Domination arises naturally in a meritocracy when one group is more productive than the other.
Personally, I identify more as a Christain and an American than I do a white person. I don't really have a strong identity in my tribal group. Both of those identifiers are based on creeds that welcome people of all ethnicities.
I find that the social darwinism tendencies in the first card, that 'if you didn't meet your goals, you didn't work hard enough' mentality is more common on the liberal/tribal side than it is on the right/moral side. We obviously value hard work but we believe in loving your neighbor and helping your community. those points often get lost in the discussions because we value our freedom and don't like to be coerced into giving.
That's the main item in the graphic that I don't agree with, maybe that and the wealth=worth + your job is you idea, which again I see more as a left wing tribal idea. In certain parts of the country the introductory question is 'what do you do' and in others the first question is 'where are you from', the whatdoyoudo-ers are blue states and the whereareyoufrom-ers tend to be red.
Apart from the wealth/job fixation most of this looks like positive universal traits that anyone is welcome to adopt without making one 'white' Liberty, work ethic, Godliness, rationality, clarity, family, beauty, punctuality, none of this is specific to white people. This ethnic separatism we're seeing so much more of these days is sad and unamerican. We live under the same laws, fight in the same armies, do business together, worship the same God, live in the same neighborhoods, speak the same language, intermarry, share in each others arts and history, by any other metric aside from melanin count we function as one people group.
This looks like a list of traits for a successful and happy life.
Right. This looks more like a parody. Wonder if this has been confirmed....
The linked tweet has its source, but i'll link it here as well.
Scroll down, it is near the bottom
https://nmaahc.si.edu/learn/talking-about-race/topics/whiteness
So what are the signs of “blackness?”
I’m assuming the opposite, so things like broken families, laziness, victim complex, lack of manners, etc?
That's is the Democrat prescription for their "voting stock"
Being white sounds nice
Hey, it's OK to be White.
Racist, anti-White propaganda is being disseminated at taxpayer expense.
I don’t know. This actually seems more racist against black people because it is essentially saying these are traits that white people have different from black people. I’m truly can’t believe someone thinks most of that stuff is bad.
I saw a quote hanging on a college students wall: "Productivity is not a virtue."
If you take out the rugged individualism and swap English and Christianity, these same principles can be applied to Asians, Indians and even Nigerian Americans. These fucking idiots can see the formula for success but are too mentally challenged to actually follow it. It’s like an obese asshole complaining how they eat shit junk food but never lose weight
It's all excellent. However spicy food is ok. Especially if made by GOYA. And maybe children don't need their own rooms. Plenty of successful immigrant children did not each have their own rooms. They knew to not talk to someone who is studying in the same room.
As for judging men by their personal qualities and abilities, and not their physical beauty, that is better. The Calvin Klein thing about how men have to be pretty has been a disaster.
Food..."bland is best"...Europeans have literally used the might of empires, trading away colonies and cities, for better access to more spices.
Normalized over time? I think you mean THIS IS WHAT BUILT AMERICA. This has not "become standard practice", THIS IS THE FORMULA ON HOW TO BE SUCCESSFUL. It doesn't matter wtf your skin color is, follow this chart and your life will be better than anyone of any race who goes against it.
Now do black culture...
"Time is a commodity" is a groundbreaking white idea pedes.
Black fragility, and for real this just looks like shit black people are jealous of
Why would a museum of one specific culture have displays about other cultures? It makes about as much sense as seeing a treatise on Hinduism or the history of settlements around the Euphrates river at an Amish cultural centre.
Unless there is some trolly meta-commentary in play that there isn't enough African culture or history worth talking about, not enough to fill the building?
So, looking through this, i agree strongly with
The points made under Rugged Individualism, Emphasis on Scientific Method, Protestant Work Ethic, many of the points under "Status, Power, & Authority", having a Future Orientation, Time, Justice, and Communication.
So, seeing as how this article is about the problems with "Whiteness", am... am I a White Supremacist?
I continued reading, here's what is wrong with "Whiteness", according to the Article:
Internalization of Whiteness and White Dominant Culture
Racism is perpetuated by deeming whiteness as superior and other racial and ethnic groups as inferior. The prevalence of white dominant culture and racism leads to an internalized racial superiority for those who adhere to it. This internalized dominance "describes the experience and attitudes of those who are members of the dominant, privileged, or powerful identity groups. Members of the [dominant] group accept their group's socially superior status as normal and deserved." [as defined by CARED: Calgary Anti-Racism Education(link is external)]
So, I am a racist with a since of internalized racial superiority and internalized dominance. Extending beyond that:
White nationalism is a concept born out of white supremacy. A key difference is a focus on nationhood. White nationalists in the United States advocate for a country that is only for the white race due to feelings of entitlement and racial superiority. They also believe that the diversity of people in the United States will lead to the destruction of whiteness and white culture - hence, the correlation to white supremacist ideology.
So, if i believe in those concepts and those ideologies, i'm a white supremacist?
Need to work on your understanding of some basics.
“White nationalism” is born out of wanting to be left alone and based on some of the most fundamental human rights: self-determination and freedom of association. Black nationalists seek exactly the same. Actually, in-group preference is universal, out-group preference or indifference is maladaptive from an evolutionary standpoint.
How can you be a supremacist in a homogeneous society? Are Japanese “supremacists”? White nationalists per definition therefore cannot be supremacists—a fact. Supremacism, intentional or not, only enters the occasion in mixed societies when one group dominates. Domination arises naturally in a meritocracy when one group is more productive than the other.
Personally, I identify more as a Christain and an American than I do a white person. I don't really have a strong identity in my tribal group. Both of those identifiers are based on creeds that welcome people of all ethnicities.
I find that the social darwinism tendencies in the first card, that 'if you didn't meet your goals, you didn't work hard enough' mentality is more common on the liberal/tribal side than it is on the right/moral side. We obviously value hard work but we believe in loving your neighbor and helping your community. those points often get lost in the discussions because we value our freedom and don't like to be coerced into giving.
That's the main item in the graphic that I don't agree with, maybe that and the wealth=worth + your job is you idea, which again I see more as a left wing tribal idea. In certain parts of the country the introductory question is 'what do you do' and in others the first question is 'where are you from', the whatdoyoudo-ers are blue states and the whereareyoufrom-ers tend to be red.
Apart from the wealth/job fixation most of this looks like positive universal traits that anyone is welcome to adopt without making one 'white' Liberty, work ethic, Godliness, rationality, clarity, family, beauty, punctuality, none of this is specific to white people. This ethnic separatism we're seeing so much more of these days is sad and unamerican. We live under the same laws, fight in the same armies, do business together, worship the same God, live in the same neighborhoods, speak the same language, intermarry, share in each others arts and history, by any other metric aside from melanin count we function as one people group.