I'm going to repost this since I didn't get an answer yet. The safest place for any child to be is living with two married biological parents.
It is probably illegal to study the connection between homosexuals and child abuse, or at least it will certainly get you fired and end your career.
But consider these facts: the vast majority of child sexual predators are males. And almost a third of child sexual abuse victims are boys. Less than 1% of men are homosexuals.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077559509342125
This study in the Netherlands shows that adoptive parents are less likely to abuse children than step parents. In fact the risk of abuse is elevated for stepparents but not for adoptive families. I think that gay people would be more likely to be adoptive parents than step parents.
Thanks for posting your info though. I would like to see more studies just like you.
So now we went from sexual abuse to "maltreatment"?
This study in the Netherlands shows that adoptive parents are less likely to abuse children than step parents.
Also, I can only read the abstract and not the study itself. But that is NOT what th abstract says.
It says adoptive parents were less likely to committ "maltreatment" (however that might be defined) compared to what the researchers "expected".
Now we do not know what the researchers expected. We do not know if "maltreatment" was higher in the adoptive group than in biological parent group.
We do not know if they controlled for family wealth. We know very little.
And there is no good reason for this vagueness in the abstract other than to confuse.
This sounds like politically correct distortion of data if anything
It’s difficult to find studies about sexual abuse specifically in adoptive families. Adoptive families are much different from a live in partner or step parent. I assume abuse falls under maltreatment.
Good news my friend. I have now looked at th study. The authors say they didn't want to look at sexual abuse in the study. So they did not look at th association between adoption and sexual abuse.
They also did not look at family wealth. Or "SES" as they put it.
This pretty much invalidates the conclusions of the study since we know that adoption is difficult and expensive and adoptive parents on average are wealthier that non adoptive parents.
We also know that low family wealth predicts "maltreatment" of children.
The vast majority of child sexual predators are not males, just as the vast majority of rapists are not males. The numbers are about even, but the data is suppressed by both feminists and chest beating traditionalists. Survey data of male sex offenders shows that almost all of them were abused by someone of the opposite sex.
The vast majority of child sexual predators are not males, just as the vast majority of rapists are not males. The numbers are about even, but the data is suppressed by both feminists and chest beating traditionalists
This is a lie.
There is no evidence to support your conspiracy theories.
Vast majority of rapists are men without a doubt. Even if we were to believe female rape is underreported, it is still proven beyond a doubt that men are vastly overrepresented.
This is by the way what victims of child sexual abuse report too. Their abusers were overwhelmingly male.
when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011).
Mary Koss, famous for promoting the 1 in 5 rape myth, was a CDC consultant and recorded in an interview stating it would be "inappropriate" to categorize a male forced into sex with a woman as rape.
In terms of other data, there is reporting DOJ data on victims of grooming/abuse in juvenile detention, with the overwhelming majority of cases being male prisoners and female staff. There's also a general article on the topic for reference.
There are financial and political incentives to erase male victims of rape, in particular those who's abuser is a woman. What you think is true is, at least in part, a lie to enable the demonization of men and the protection of female abusers because it would be inconvenient for the public narrative.
I'm going to repost this since I didn't get an answer yet. The safest place for any child to be is living with two married biological parents.
It is probably illegal to study the connection between homosexuals and child abuse, or at least it will certainly get you fired and end your career.
But consider these facts: the vast majority of child sexual predators are males. And almost a third of child sexual abuse victims are boys. Less than 1% of men are homosexuals.
So you do the math yourself
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1077559509342125 This study in the Netherlands shows that adoptive parents are less likely to abuse children than step parents. In fact the risk of abuse is elevated for stepparents but not for adoptive families. I think that gay people would be more likely to be adoptive parents than step parents.
Thanks for posting your info though. I would like to see more studies just like you.
So now we went from sexual abuse to "maltreatment"?
Also, I can only read the abstract and not the study itself. But that is NOT what th abstract says. It says adoptive parents were less likely to committ "maltreatment" (however that might be defined) compared to what the researchers "expected". Now we do not know what the researchers expected. We do not know if "maltreatment" was higher in the adoptive group than in biological parent group. We do not know if they controlled for family wealth. We know very little. And there is no good reason for this vagueness in the abstract other than to confuse. This sounds like politically correct distortion of data if anything
It’s difficult to find studies about sexual abuse specifically in adoptive families. Adoptive families are much different from a live in partner or step parent. I assume abuse falls under maltreatment.
Good news my friend. I have now looked at th study. The authors say they didn't want to look at sexual abuse in the study. So they did not look at th association between adoption and sexual abuse.
They also did not look at family wealth. Or "SES" as they put it.
This pretty much invalidates the conclusions of the study since we know that adoption is difficult and expensive and adoptive parents on average are wealthier that non adoptive parents. We also know that low family wealth predicts "maltreatment" of children.
And why do you think it's hard to find studies like that?
Because no one thought of studying it?
Or because of political interests preventing such studies?
The vast majority of child sexual predators are not males, just as the vast majority of rapists are not males. The numbers are about even, but the data is suppressed by both feminists and chest beating traditionalists. Survey data of male sex offenders shows that almost all of them were abused by someone of the opposite sex.
This is a lie.
There is no evidence to support your conspiracy theories.
Vast majority of rapists are men without a doubt. Even if we were to believe female rape is underreported, it is still proven beyond a doubt that men are vastly overrepresented.
This is by the way what victims of child sexual abuse report too. Their abusers were overwhelmingly male.
There were several articles on the CDC's National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NIPSVS): https://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/
Mary Koss, famous for promoting the 1 in 5 rape myth, was a CDC consultant and recorded in an interview stating it would be "inappropriate" to categorize a male forced into sex with a woman as rape.
In terms of other data, there is reporting DOJ data on victims of grooming/abuse in juvenile detention, with the overwhelming majority of cases being male prisoners and female staff. There's also a general article on the topic for reference.
There are financial and political incentives to erase male victims of rape, in particular those who's abuser is a woman. What you think is true is, at least in part, a lie to enable the demonization of men and the protection of female abusers because it would be inconvenient for the public narrative.