I'm sure you know pedophilia unfortunately affects many children in families with "one man and one woman traditionally married."
But statistics are very clear. Non biological parents are much more likely to sexually abuse children.
But sure, worry about gay degeneracy.
One third of children who are sexually abused are boys. The vast majority of them are abused by men.
Yet homosexual men only make up about 1% of the population.
Dn't say non bio parents are more likely to abuse as though it's an argument against gay parents. Pull the data for gay parents instead of lumping in step parents, adoptive parents, foster care, or whatever else is in that broad term which includes any orientation.
But statistics are very clear. Non biological parents are much more likely to sexually abuse children.
One third of children who are sexually abused are boys. The vast majority of them are abused by men. Yet homosexual men only make up about 1% of the population.
Why should we not worry about these facts?
Non biological doesn't mean the same thing as gay.
I never said it did.
Let's argue the facts and actual arguments instead of creating strawman arguments.
Dn't say non bio parents are more likely to abuse as though it's an argument against gay parents. Pull the data for gay parents instead of lumping in step parents, adoptive parents, foster care, or whatever else is in that broad term which includes any orientation.