First they came for the Milos, but I was not a deliberately provocative flamboyant homosexual with a lack of self control, and so I said nothing. Then they came for the Alexs and I said nothing, for he is a bit of a space wizard, and I didn't really care if the frogs were gay or not. Then they came for the Weinstiens, but I said nothing, for I would not go to a nutty left wing college if you paid me. Then they came for the Ruebens and Petersons but still I said nothing, because I was afraid of crazy trans activists, and those nut cases are not my problem.
And then they came for the moderate centrists, and I began to realize that If I don't grow a pair, they will be coming for me.
Yep, Milo was the canary in the coal mine. The way conservatives let him be destroyed was fkn shameful.
It was before I took my red pill, but yeah, in hindsight he was. I've been loudly standing up against this shit since the JP train arrived. Lost a few "friends" - but no loss really, anyone who call me a reeeecist in public like they did can get bent anyway :P
We are winning I tell you, gotta keep point at the commies and saying to the normies "man, what are those people doing do you think?".
I never liked Milo, and I still don't like him.
I think homosexuality is wrong, disgusting, and a marxist plot to destroy our society.
I will NEVER celebrate it.
If you are a flamboyant homosexual, then you are my enemy. I don't care what you do in your bedroom, but you are NOT spreading your sexual perversions to my kids.
You don’t have to like him in order to defend his right to free speech. If you only stand up for the free speech of people who say things you like, you’re doing it wrong and deserve to reap what you sow.
Spreading immorality is not protected speech, and it never was. Not so long ago it was illegal to mail gay porn.
I find your dumbass restrictions on free speech immoral, therefore you have to shut up.
It's the speech laws we had since day 1 of this country's founding.
A morally depraved society is incapable of handling freedom. You end up with what we have today.
Get rid of all the immoral crap on the airwaves, censor people based on morality, and you'll see a return of standards and accountability.
For instance, no, you do NOT have a right to publish pornography. Nor can you publish anti-american statements.
I know it sounds ridiculous because you have been brainwashed to believe that absolute freedom to do whatever you want is a good idea, but even a modicum of thinking will expose the error of this.
We MUST ensure that the next generation and all subsequent generations be raised with a very high level of morality and ethics. We cannot survive unless they are. And we cannot do it alone.
We are in the state we are in, where I have to basically keep my kids away from ALL American culture, because it is ALL morally repugnant.
Or is that what you want? Radicalized sects growing up independent of each other because they are afraid to go out into the public square and see homosexual men raping each other?
I’m not disagreeing with you about what’s moral or immoral, just about whether government should be the arbiter of that or the individual should be. OBVIOUSLY the answer is that it should be the individual, because if “morality” is compelled by law it no longer has any moral value.
And again - if you don’t support the free speech of ppl who say things you dislike, you’re doing it wrong.
Nope.
Build a whorehouse in my neighborhood i will burn it to the ground.
States and cities and counties can abd should ban all public displays of morak degeneracy.
I don't have to approve of someone's lifestyle in order to agree with them on other things.
(You get it!)
But we do need common standards for what is and is not acceptable behavior in public.
For sure, cultural norms (so being polite) take the friction outta everday life for everyone. What we need to be mindful of is that the left weaponises this against us - I am reluctant to socially isolate anyone in today's climate. They seek to pick us off one by one.
So, the path I have chosen is similar to Voltaire - I may think you are a space wizard or flat earther or whatever, but you absolutely have the right to speak, and if that speech finds an audience, well good luck to you. I accept that Milo is a difficult case, but that's what makes him useful to talk about.
It's time we realized Voltaire is an idiot.
We must control what happens in public.
That sounds more like a left wing authoritarian than I am comfortable with.
Any argument or ideology that can survive only via compulsion or suppression isn't a good idea. I'll take my chances with the freedom to argue my values thanks.
I have a fb thread going this minute with a bunch of friends and am redpilling the crap out of them of that massively racist "whiteness" poster going round.
Bad ideas get pwned eventually.
Go back 200 years. What do you think would have happened if you tried to talk about sexual relations in public?
Our society is so corrupt that we do not even know what is rights anymore.
Milo glows in the dark, if you catch my drift.
He works for the CIA/FBI.