3126
Comments (378)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
27
29
ColludingWithAmerica 29 points ago +29 / -0

How do they leave out the entire Middle East’s responsibility in this affair?

No mention if the saudi/muslim involvement. No mention if the people who actually owned the boats. I guess that part of history is too inconvenient for britannica

20
astro_eng 20 points ago +20 / -0

Every source has its biases hence the importance of multiple sources.

8
tombombadil 8 points ago +8 / -0

Britannica is one of those “reputable” sources that college professors love... because they are the ones who write it.

2
Major_Nutt 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do they leave out the entire Middle East’s responsibility in this affair?

Are you serious? Being a haji is a "I can do quite literally WHATEVER I want and get away with it" deal. Sexual emergency? Oh, that's just their culture. Acid attacks? Slutty white woman should cover up in her native country. No class is more protected than muzzies.