Because proving counter-factuals is no longer practically impossible! (So long as the conclusion toes the party line). Just like correlation=causation now and the multivariate nature of life has ceased to exist. Agree with me or you’re a science-denying bigot!!
The latest U trial results showed a slight benefit among people with early COVID-19 symptoms who were older, but there weren't enough people in the study in this age group to be statistically significant, Boulware said.
Frankly, how would you know? One's symptoms might have worsened without the HCQ, but you wouldn't know if you were taking it.
Only way to know is have a large enough population with a control group and see how many land in the hospital.
Is 491 too small?
Would have to ask somebody that knows statistics.
Because proving counter-factuals is no longer practically impossible! (So long as the conclusion toes the party line). Just like correlation=causation now and the multivariate nature of life has ceased to exist. Agree with me or you’re a science-denying bigot!!
The latest U trial results showed a slight benefit among people with early COVID-19 symptoms who were older, but there weren't enough people in the study in this age group to be statistically significant, Boulware said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Who cares? Those aren't the people that need treatment.
can you blame them? this is the act of desperation
CNN has little effect on people with nominal cognition. The best cure is prevention.
But you can take Fauci’s remdesivir and destroy your kidneys and liver. Yay!
This is retarded. Do they not realize that maybe it was the HCQ that prevented them from being hospitalized?
No they're doing this intentionally