They lump the 3 serious security risks with being "associated with a violation of Twitter’s Terms of Service" (not even BEING a violation, but being ASSOCIATED with a violation" of Twitter’s Terms of Service), because they want people to be literally scared of going on to Zerohedge's website to read the article that they do NOT want people to read. It's so purposeful and manipulative!
That's what I found absurd too.
They lump the 3 serious security risks with being "associated with a violation of Twitter’s Terms of Service" (not even BEING a violation, but being ASSOCIATED with a violation" of Twitter’s Terms of Service), because they want people to be literally scared of going on to Zerohedge's website to read the article that they do NOT want people to read. It's so purposeful and manipulative!
Honestly reads like defamation and twatter should be sued.
And of course, they've been ramping this nonsense up this year because of the coming election.