1928
Comments (32)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
41
leing15 41 points ago +41 / -0

That's what I found absurd too.

They lump the 3 serious security risks with being "associated with a violation of Twitter’s Terms of Service" (not even BEING a violation, but being ASSOCIATED with a violation" of Twitter’s Terms of Service), because they want people to be literally scared of going on to Zerohedge's website to read the article that they do NOT want people to read. It's so purposeful and manipulative!

9
Lord_Kek 9 points ago +9 / -0

Honestly reads like defamation and twatter should be sued.

5
d909 5 points ago +5 / -0

And of course, they've been ramping this nonsense up this year because of the coming election.