676
Comments (33)
sorted by:
30
conservativefrank 30 points ago +31 / -1

We supposedly have 5-4 now, yet it's really not. It should be 9-0 Conservatives who follow the Constitution.

It's at least really 5-4 against us right now, if not 7-2.

17
redpillthenormies [S] 17 points ago +18 / -1

This is so true. Why are there even liberals on the Supreme Court? It literally means people who are not following the Constitution.

0
lowkeylocarb 0 points ago +3 / -3

Balance is good. Keep both sides honest, ya know (unless its Republicans and Democrats).

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
7
d909 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yup! The founders provided a way to change it if necessary, but liberals can't even convince a simple majority of the country to implement their nonsense, let alone the required numbers for an amendment, so they invented this living document bullshit to justify just doing whatever they want without actual public support.

0
lowkeylocarb 0 points ago +1 / -1

I dont see why

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
lowkeylocarb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Although the Supreme Court may hear an appeal on any question of law provided it has jurisdiction, it usually does not hold trials. Instead, the Court’s task is to interpret the meaning of a law, to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied. Lower courts are obligated to follow the precedent set by the Supreme Court when rendering decisions.

From the Whitehouse.gov website. Here's the link:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/the-judicial-branch/#:~:text=Although%20the%20Supreme%20Court%20may,a%20law%20should%20be%20applied.**

1
deleted 1 point ago +5 / -4
1
lowkeylocarb 1 point ago +1 / -0

The darkness makes the light shine brighter.

0
JudgeWhoAllowsStuff 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nice handshake flair.

1
lowkeylocarb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure why I have that. If you look at my submitted posts I posted the first night or so this site went live.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
2
Trumpfan1 2 points ago +4 / -2

Roberts has been siding with the libs on the court for years and Gorsuch (Gorsucks) is proving to be a deep state plant. Also, RBG won’t be retiring OR DYING if President Trump wins again. So, what we need are a series of fatal car 🚘 accidents (Roberts, RBG, Breyer, Gorsucks) and Trump needs to pick judges the left truly despises.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
1
anon572759 1 point ago +1 / -0

Speaking of, what's everyone outlook on the wise diabetic overweight Latina making it through Trumps second term?

8
FactsOverFeelings 8 points ago +8 / -0

You mean we could actually get a 5-4. Roberts is Kagan except not as good at softball.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Eternal_Vigilance 5 points ago +5 / -0

My money is on the wise Latina going first. She is really unhealthy. Supreme Court picks are such a crap shoot. Lifetime appointments and answering to no one

4
Reborned20 4 points ago +4 / -0

Keep Reminding Human Beings of their responsibilities and things will go fine. But Don't stop Reminding them. Read your Constitution !

If you sit home waiting for someone else to: Help your neighborhood, Report those "extra" mail in ballots, Stand guard at your church or business, vote in the general or special elections, identify the safe houses, then you will expect to wake up a Communist.

Freedom is not automatic, Freedom is not self fulfilling, There must be time, money, thought, and yes, blood spent for Freedom.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Patriot4evr 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dead babies (abortion) and no babies (lgbtq) have done so much for America 🧐

2
JuicyfearsMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think he means 2 more justices will be coming in the next 4 years..rbg and alito is rumored to be wanting to retire as well

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
Choppermagic 2 points ago +2 / -0

6-3. ROberts is blackmailed

2
ShrikeDeCil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now add the idea of invalidating Obama's Presidency entirely.

1
lowkeylocarb 1 point ago +1 / -0

If he's convicted of treason (he won't be -_-), does that invalidate his presidency?

3
ShrikeDeCil 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have no idea, but the House controls initiation of Impeaching. "This person was nominated by a traitor" or so would be a good start on impeaching a SCJ - since we've decided it's all politics, all the time, no reason why not.

Impeach Roberts first (for whatever blackmail seems to be in there somewhere) and the press would be enjoying it too much to realize "Hey, wait a second here, why are they doing this?"

2
Independenceforever 2 points ago +2 / -0

The supreme court is full of traitors and Clarence Thomas.

And they think they are somehow superior than the other 2 branches of government and can legislate from the bench.

I have zero confidence in Kavanaugh and Gorsuck. The Kavanaugh sideshow was just a circus show to give us a false victory while Blasey witch did her best peter strzok satanism spell imitation on the nation.

I hope I'm wrong! Listen to them write - their words give them away so easily.

Mr. Thomas gets my salute and respect.

2
Hillary4Prison2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Young Dems I know are the opposite of black-pilled. They mostly hate Biden but are aware of the stakes and bitterly remember all too well election night 2016.

It’s discouraging a bit to face their resolution but it’s definitely important to try and convince even a third party vote! They are all too aware that making such a change is almost like voting for 4 more years though so if anyone has some advice/insight into what works best I’m all ears!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Yucky 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. For every never trump neocon cuck, they are basically admitting they don't care about the supreme court for a generation.