Yup! The founders provided a way to change it if necessary, but liberals can't even convince a simple majority of the country to implement their nonsense, let alone the required numbers for an amendment, so they invented this living document bullshit to justify just doing whatever they want without actual public support.
Although the Supreme Court may hear an appeal on any question of law provided it has jurisdiction, it usually does not hold trials. Instead, the Court’s task is to interpret the meaning of a law, to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied. Lower courts are obligated to follow the precedent set by the Supreme Court when rendering decisions.
Balance is good. Keep both sides honest, ya know (unless its Republicans and Democrats).
Yup! The founders provided a way to change it if necessary, but liberals can't even convince a simple majority of the country to implement their nonsense, let alone the required numbers for an amendment, so they invented this living document bullshit to justify just doing whatever they want without actual public support.
From the Whitehouse.gov website. Here's the link:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/the-judicial-branch/#:~:text=Although%20the%20Supreme%20Court%20may,a%20law%20should%20be%20applied.**
The darkness makes the light shine brighter.
Nice handshake flair.
Not sure why I have that. If you look at my submitted posts I posted the first night or so this site went live.