710
Comments (23)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
10
CountryState_of_Mind [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

I thought that was odd and surprising also. There is no common ground with communists.

7
Anti_Immigration 7 points ago +8 / -1

More cucking to people that hate them, hate the country, and hate everything it stands for.

People need to wake the fuck up and realize these people are not operating in good faith and hate your fucking guts.

8
CountryState_of_Mind [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

I agree, 100%. BLM is just Soros' desperate attempt to divide our Country. People do need to wake up.

6
Pederrr 6 points ago +6 / -0

Some people support BLM through misguided views fed to them by the media. I know apolitical types who think BLM is just about cops killing a bunch of black folks, they're simply completely uninformed.

3
Jaqen 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is a good strategy from a diplomatic relations standpoint.

Having an ambassador from their side officially invited to the table shows that you respect them enough to at least go through the motions and pleasantries.

It also makes them look incredibly bad and or cowardly if they decline the offer.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Jaqen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m aware of that. But you haven’t really addressed my point.

Having an ambassador of your enemy at the meeting table is a part of diplomacy. You sit down and figure out exactly what it is you’re fighting for. Maybe even agree to not fight, and come to a mutually beneficial agreement. Or completely disagree, walk away from the table, and go to war the next day.

In any case the point stands that it is not at all weird to invite an ambassador from the other side to chat. Given how insane their movement is, allowing them some air time can only help expose their lunacy to a wider audience.

TL:DR - know thine enemy.