258
Comments (17)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
greginald_mcdicken 3 points ago +3 / -0

Possibly because of vague tweets like this, that don't name the organization or provide a link to any background material.

4
tokenninja [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

People who are interested generally click on the tweet and continue reading.

4
FlaviusOdo 4 points ago +4 / -0

To play devil's advocate; not putting any specific information in the "hook" tweet suggests the person doesn't have any worthwhile information. With how much information is constantly being out out there, you have to prioritize what you invest effort into due to how many dead ends there are. Who's the actor who kept talking about naming names of Hollywood pedos in a documentary and then eventually when he had a screening it didn't work? To my knowledge, the guy still hasn't released any real information and nothing has come of it. Years of nothing. The same as the tick tock stuff, put up or shut up. We're miles past the teasing of information and pedes are getting tired of it.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably referring to the pedo ring Peter Scully sold snuff videos to.