Attacking Unions is the wrong approach. A Union is a tool, it can be used for good or bad. Literally EVERY advance for the working man was made by Unions. Nothing else has helped fight extreme wealth disparity. Rich CEOs actually can afford to give raises.
Indoctrination starts with administration. All they ever do is cause all the problems and take all the pay. Firing shitheads needs to happen; not just teachers but cops, DC swamp, you name it.
Schools are not private sector; there are no CEOs. Public sector unions are vile, and if you don't like the pay as a public servant, leave for the private sector. Join a union there if you want to.
The distinction between Unions being legal in one vs the other is artificial. One could make the case that a Union of public servants could have some limits put on them, and that has happened. You could argue that more are needed, and that's evidently true. But banishing Unions altogether for public servants, while pretending that doesn't serve to dismantle Unions in the private sector is laughably naive.
A job is still a job. A working stiff is still a working stiff. Upper management still gets ridiculously more money for doing ridiculously less. Nothing has ever tackled that problem as effectively as a Union. That hasn't been effective for many decades, which doesn't mean Unions should be destroyed. It means the problem should be fixed.
The problem is that the hard left union leadership uses its money to elect and lobby for leftist politics. The rise of administrators is downstream from leftist edu-politics. Public sector unions are inimical to democracy and should not exist.
Attacking Unions is the wrong approach. A Union is a tool, it can be used for good or bad. Literally EVERY advance for the working man was made by Unions. Nothing else has helped fight extreme wealth disparity. Rich CEOs actually can afford to give raises.
Indoctrination starts with administration. All they ever do is cause all the problems and take all the pay. Firing shitheads needs to happen; not just teachers but cops, DC swamp, you name it.
Schools are not private sector; there are no CEOs. Public sector unions are vile, and if you don't like the pay as a public servant, leave for the private sector. Join a union there if you want to.
This is an artificial distinction. It's merely an attempt to remove Unions entirely. There are better solutions.
The distinction between private sector and government is artificial? Did you wander out of r/socialism?
The distinction between Unions being legal in one vs the other is artificial. One could make the case that a Union of public servants could have some limits put on them, and that has happened. You could argue that more are needed, and that's evidently true. But banishing Unions altogether for public servants, while pretending that doesn't serve to dismantle Unions in the private sector is laughably naive.
A job is still a job. A working stiff is still a working stiff. Upper management still gets ridiculously more money for doing ridiculously less. Nothing has ever tackled that problem as effectively as a Union. That hasn't been effective for many decades, which doesn't mean Unions should be destroyed. It means the problem should be fixed.
The problem is that the hard left union leadership uses its money to elect and lobby for leftist politics. The rise of administrators is downstream from leftist edu-politics. Public sector unions are inimical to democracy and should not exist.