3924
Comments (243)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
30
AlphaNathan 30 points ago +30 / -0

If it weren't for the media, no one would really care about catching the pinko pox anyway.

I'll tell you one thing, I'll take the virus in a shot glass before I'm getting a vaccine for it.

24
davidmode 24 points ago +24 / -0

isnt it funny?

we have to shut everything down and wait until theres a vaccine that people wont take anyways

clownworld

13
CommieCucker 13 points ago +13 / -0

A vaccine for one of the viruses that causes the common cold. We must wait for THE CURE FOR THE COMMON COLD before we reopen...

4
Kweebecker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Remember, Coronavirus antibodies generally only last for a couple months (kind of why we don't already have a vaccine on-hand), so that vaccine's gonna need be some future tech science shit.

2
djmarcone 2 points ago +2 / -0

which it won't be, it will be a rushed POS trash injection that "creates antibodies" in the few suckers they tested it on, then they roll it out - untested for long term efficacy OR side effects - and it becomes a political football that the scared people can go and get.

To create a safe and effective vaccine takes YEARS and in many cases is simply not possible.

7
deplorable-d00d 7 points ago +7 / -0

Are you kidding? In CA, there will lines miles long to get the injection.

3
djmarcone 3 points ago +3 / -0

what percentage of those sheep will have SERIOUS side effects? Anyone want to take some bets?

I will say .... 35% will have serious side effects, 50% will have side effects of some sort including ... symptoms of a coronavirus. I will even go so far as to say more than 1% will die.

Because it is going to be a half assed vaccine. Rushed because of all the hype.

1
davidmode 1 point ago +1 / -0

oh yea, i know what you mean... i meant it in the sense that, they cant force people to take the vaccine and there would be many people that wouldnt take it... so, waiting for the vaccine is retarded.