1809
She Probably Disappeared Right After This Photo Was Taken (media.patriots.win) ⚠ NSFCucks ⚠
posted ago by BowelSharpton ago by BowelSharpton +1809 / -0
50 comments
50 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (50)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ -2 ▼
– Elecon -2 points ago +4 / -6

The left's argument here is both need to wear a mask for it to be effective. Literal analogy they used involved urinating.

If person A tries and urinates on person B, but person A is wearing pants, it's contained.

However if person B tries and urinates on person A, and person B isn't wearing pants, person's B urine will contaminate person A because it's not contained by pants.

So both person's A and B need to wear pants(masks).

Yeah...

Edit: lol at all the downvotes. It's not my argument, it's what the left says to this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– NoahGav 6 points ago +7 / -1

So? They will pee in their pants instead? That sounds about right for liberals.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ILearnedToCode 2 points ago +2 / -0

So dont pee on people, its not hard

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Elecon 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's their argument to the statement in the picture. That the urine are droplets and pants are the mask. Needless to say, that the fact they touch their masks and other surfaces and touch their faces after just makes the whole mask thing pointless.

permalink parent save report block reply