My main argument was simply pointing out that believing races are superior is the definition of racism. This isn't debatable.
You took exception because you think it's true that some races are superior, and I'm telling you that's irrelevant to my point.
When you say things like "Blacks are genetically lower-IQ on average than whites" that makes you racist. I'm saying this without judgement and as a simple statement of fact.
And I'm not about to have a debate about nature/nurture.
Saying 100 years of scientific data and analysis has proven that African-Americans have a lower IQ than Ashkenazi Jews, Europeans, Asians, and Latinos doesn't make me a racist, it makes me a data-driven, scientific method subscriber, which I am. You have injected absolutely zero data-driven analysis into this discussion. You have continued to falsely equate my information-driven statement with your little feely feelings with absolutely nothing even remotely resembling substantiated opposition. Your only point, that you keep echolaliaing is that inherent differences between observably different races is "racist". Let me ask you a question. When you take a census, or fill out a employment application, what's one of the consistent questions they ask you across the board?
My main argument was simply pointing out that believing races are superior is the definition of racism. This isn't debatable.
You took exception because you think it's true that some races are superior, and I'm telling you that's irrelevant to my point.
When you say things like "Blacks are genetically lower-IQ on average than whites" that makes you racist. I'm saying this without judgement and as a simple statement of fact.
And I'm not about to have a debate about nature/nurture.
Saying 100 years of scientific data and analysis has proven that African-Americans have a lower IQ than Ashkenazi Jews, Europeans, Asians, and Latinos doesn't make me a racist, it makes me a data-driven, scientific method subscriber, which I am. You have injected absolutely zero data-driven analysis into this discussion. You have continued to falsely equate my information-driven statement with your little feely feelings with absolutely nothing even remotely resembling substantiated opposition. Your only point, that you keep echolaliaing is that inherent differences between observably different races is "racist". Let me ask you a question. When you take a census, or fill out a employment application, what's one of the consistent questions they ask you across the board?
My friend, you replied to me, what makes you think I want to have a scientific discussion about racism on this board?
I really went out of my way to make it clear I wasn't using the term pejoratively and you still managed to take offense and lash out.
I think you're that boog guy.
Have a good night.
u got bodied homie.