4786
Comments (692)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
Deadangles 4 points ago +4 / -0

Anyone who's ever played an instrument or a sport has been told that talent is not enough.

Hard work, practice AND talent is what makes greatness.

A talented person who never practices won't be great. And a person who has 0 talent and works hard might be mediocre but not great. A person of average talent and above average work ethic will probably be great. An extremely talented person with below-average work ethic will probably be good

2
OrangeManMeh 2 points ago +2 / -0

THIS.

This exactly.

This applies to literally everything in life. You're lucky if you're talented. You're lucky if you have a high work ethic. And if you're really, really lucky, you have both.

-3
aparition42 -3 points ago +2 / -5

Define talent without using ephemeral concepts.

6
Deadangles 6 points ago +6 / -0

One's natural ability and potential

0
aparition42 0 points ago +2 / -2

Both of those are ephemeral concepts. There is no way to objectively quantify either in an empirical way.

5
Deadangles 5 points ago +5 / -0

Okay if you want to argue people do not have innate talent or ability i duno what to tell you.

Two kids can put in the same practice hours and have identical practice regimens but they're probably not going to have the same caliber of skill. Anyone who's played an instrument recognizes this