I upvoted you but I don't see him passing drug legalization because these drugs do hurt a lot of people. I also don't think he can fire everyone in government and right now nobody can tell the difference between a good .gov employee and the deep state it's that bad. Even if he fired the lot of them, there's no crop of patriots to take over those positions. I'm excited for the second term with tempered expectations. Even if he does some reform it's better than the uniparty response we've had for decades.
I'm guessing half or more of current government jobs could be eliminated overnight with zero impact to daily ops tempo. There's a lot of dead weight, to put it mildly.
use every remaining MOAB we have on cities that are basically run by the cartels. say we're sorry about the civilian casualties and we can make up for it by sending back the 30 million (probably way more) of their citizens that are here illegally.
then make more MOABs and do the same thing to the other countries that are run by the cartels. Blood for the Blood God
"I said, I want to know something before you go," Trump recalled. "How many people will be killed — in this case, Iranians. I said, how many people are going to be killed?"
His military team said it would find out, Trump told Todd, and came back with the answer that approximately 150 people would very likely die.
The president said:
"I thought about it for a second and I said, you know what, they shot down an unmanned drone, plane, whatever you want to call it, and here we are sitting with 150 dead people, that would have taken place probably within a half an hour after I said go ahead.
"And I didn't like it. I didn't think — I didn't think it was proportionate."
I don't think it's in Trump's character to "say sorry for civilian deaths", but this passage also speaks volumes about his level-headedness to proportionately respond to attacks. And cartels are an insidious threat attacking daily.
(This comment shall not be construed as a judgment whether throwing MOABs at cartel-run cities is proportionate.)
I upvoted you but I don't see him passing drug legalization because these drugs do hurt a lot of people. I also don't think he can fire everyone in government and right now nobody can tell the difference between a good .gov employee and the deep state it's that bad. Even if he fired the lot of them, there's no crop of patriots to take over those positions. I'm excited for the second term with tempered expectations. Even if he does some reform it's better than the uniparty response we've had for decades.
I'm guessing half or more of current government jobs could be eliminated overnight with zero impact to daily ops tempo. There's a lot of dead weight, to put it mildly.
who said anything about legalizing drugs?
use every remaining MOAB we have on cities that are basically run by the cartels. say we're sorry about the civilian casualties and we can make up for it by sending back the 30 million (probably way more) of their citizens that are here illegally.
then make more MOABs and do the same thing to the other countries that are run by the cartels. Blood for the Blood God
Recall the Iran strike call-off?
His military team said it would find out, Trump told Todd, and came back with the answer that approximately 150 people would very likely die.
The president said:
"I thought about it for a second and I said, you know what, they shot down an unmanned drone, plane, whatever you want to call it, and here we are sitting with 150 dead people, that would have taken place probably within a half an hour after I said go ahead.
"And I didn't like it. I didn't think — I didn't think it was proportionate."
I don't think it's in Trump's character to "say sorry for civilian deaths", but this passage also speaks volumes about his level-headedness to proportionately respond to attacks. And cartels are an insidious threat attacking daily.
(This comment shall not be construed as a judgment whether throwing MOABs at cartel-run cities is proportionate.)
youre right it may not go far enough