You're choosing to take offense. You're choosing to read between the lines. I literally, explicitly pointed out that agnostic theism is a valid and logical position.

Yes, gnostic atheists - inasmuch as those who declare complete lack and impossibility of divinity - are stupid. I am insulting them, because they are willfully ignorant and refuse to acknowledge any possibility of being incorrect. It's not that they reject the data given to them and find it insufficient (agnostic theist), nor that they don't bother looking at the data because they don't care about the subject (agnostic atheist); they willfully choose to look at what info exists, interpret it to fit their hypothesis, and attempt to terminate the experiment without allowing any more data. Or perhaps more accurately, without accepting that their data collection is woefully inadequate for the scope of their study.

I'm going to stand by that. If you wanna protect them, feel free. But considering you seem to very clearly be of like mind, I'm kinda confused why you seem ready to die on a hill for them. It's ironic that it's usually gnostics who are hell-bent on shitting on agnostics, but for some reason you're trying to demean me, another agnostic, for... What, agreeing with you that it is physically impossible to be gnostic on an existentialist question?