430
Comments (27)
sorted by:
11
GGJanitor 11 points ago +11 / -0

One does not simply fuck with Michelle Malkin!

Heads will roll

9
knightofday 9 points ago +9 / -0

I’m just over here raging at how Democrat mayors are openly tying cops hands when it comes to protecting citizens from harassment and harm.

I KNOW they want us to read and shoot some of these clowns soo bad, they want their martyrs and these Leftists are too retarded to realize it. But how long are we supposed to keep running away after being assaulted in front of police in cities coast to coast...

The Lefts leadership wants a civil conflict soooooo bad and these useful fucking idiots are completely blind to it. End rant, just frustrated like you all

6
Jabblemonkey1 6 points ago +6 / -0

I am in no way advocating violence......

I wonder what the reaction would be if a Patriot, with lawfully owned firearm, and concealed carry permit, were to shoot a couple of Antifa types in self-defense.

Of course, the fake news would refer to the Antifa criminals as "heroes", but I bet the soi bois would cease their more overt acts of violence against people.

Personally, I think the Antifa types are enemy combatants, out of regular uniform, so according to the Geneva Convention, they can be executed without trial, but I doubt that will happen.....

8
Shalomtoyou [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's probably just a matter of time now.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Jabblemonkey1 4 points ago +4 / -0

The charges were dropped, or so I was told.

4
neverreddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah he was released after charges dropped.

4
TheThreeSeashells 4 points ago +4 / -0

I am in no way advocating violence...

You're correct. You're advocating self-defense.

3
fskfsk 3 points ago +4 / -1

Not worth the risk. Even if it was justified with video evidence, you would be prosecuted.

Also, once your name and photo are plastered all over the Internet, you wouldn't be able to go outside without being assaulted. An angry mob might burn down your home.

I even read there's a term for this "Anarcho-Tyranny". It's when angry mobs of criminals can do whatever they want, but people who defend themselves are prosecuted.

Also remember that the "peaceful protestors" are accomplices. The large mob of "nonviolent" people give cover for the violent people. If the person next to you is throwing fireworks and you're just standing there, you can't claim to be a nonviolent protestor anymore.

1
BetaODork 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only worth the risk if you knew another 1000 patriots are gonna stand with you. This is why the left does everything in mobs. They know right now that we’re all kind of just sitting ducks and though we maybe be fine 1 on 1, that’s not how they’re playing it. The only thing that’s going to stand against this is another opposing group. There needs to be organization. Without that, we will face the problems you mentioned.

1
fskfsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

It still won't work when the police try to shut down your 1000 person group, while leaving the other side alone. Police let the BLM/Antifa mobs do whatever they want, but that isn't the case for organized self-defense groups.

They have all their bases covered. The media will portray your group as terrorists who need to be eliminated.

The BLM/Antifa crowd is REALLY well organized. They have this down to a science.

It also could be that police are always fighting last year's threats. Police were able to handle nonviolent protestors, or nonviolent protestors with a few violent people. Police aren't prepared for organized violent protestors, using nonviolent people for support and a meat shield.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
Marina 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I was going to a BLM Riot I would take some protection with me. I don’t exactly know what but I would spend some time on it.

4
TheThreeSeashells 4 points ago +4 / -0

Knowing Michelle, this isn't going to stop her.

4
crobbies 4 points ago +4 / -0

We should support policing as an institution but keep in mind individual officers can be pieces of shit just like any other person. BLM was stupid to not want just more oversight/accountability, but instead supported "defunding". Civil libertarians of all stripes want government officials or government agents (like cops) to be held accountable.

4
Shalomtoyou [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well I think it's obvious by now that BLM is not about reducing police brutality. That's the excuse for a Marxist push.

It's also obvious that the democrats are in cahoots with Antifa and BLM and ordering the police to not intervene. They can't deny responsibility.

4
Bingobaggins 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why do cops just watch?

2
Shalomtoyou [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because Antifa is the modern KKK and the KKK was often a tool for local politicians.

4
Julius_Severus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Anarcho Tyranny is when rioters are not policed but the people who defend themselves from rioters are

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Managerial_state#Anarchy_and_tyranny

3
thewordwolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine defending the police.

lol

"Oy! You got a loicense for lockdown violation, mate?!"

2
Shalomtoyou [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope she carries the banner high, proud, and forward.

2
Kame_House 2 points ago +2 / -0

The police are there to arrest anyone center or right of center for defending themselves.

2
Shalomtoyou [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

And that's a problem.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Shalomtoyou [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

A lot of us believed the police would not enforce unlawful gun seizure laws.

This is a painful, but important, lesson to learn.

1
Dialectic 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol just keep up that blind Leo support. I’m sure they’ll come save you.

Pfffffffft lmao